View Single Post
Old 01-09-2009, 09:44 AM   #23
amoosenamedhank
5th Gear Member
 
amoosenamedhank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Vehicle: 1996 GT
Location: MN
Posts: 3,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boostanggt View Post
This is why I think you should have to pass a test before you are aloud to post on here. There is no restriction to the motor whatsoever with a turbo besides a tiny bit of back pressure. A roots style supercharger builds boost instantly. Piston speed goes from cruising to red line ridiculously fast. Whereas a turbo will gradually build boost and progressively increase piston speed. It's a wasted energy turned into power. Why do you think superchargers make less power lb. for lb. Also go turn a supercharger and then a turbo, whether journal or bb, then make your call.
I guess I'm not sure why you would assume I'm referring to a roots style supercharger, how many of us are buying aftermarket roots style supercharger systems? Beyond that, you took the most extreme setup simply to embellish your point.

Centrifugal superchargers are very fixed, they work off of a very linear power curve and build boost progressively.

Of course a turbo is more efficient but I don't recall that being the argument. In my experience I've seen many more, well tuned, turbo cars take out engines then there supercharged counterparts. At least a 3:1 ratio.
__________________
amoosenamedhank is offline   Reply With Quote