The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 6 Cyl (V6) Applications
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-09-2009, 11:58 AM   #11
bgnn32
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Vehicle: 1997, Ford, Mustang V6
Location: MA
Posts: 313
Default

Do it. well worth the $400
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
bgnn32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 12:34 PM   #12
Xemeth
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Vehicle: 2002 GT
Location: CT
Posts: 4,609
Send a message via AIM to Xemeth
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fearthisinc View Post
Honestly I have no idea lol.. I started this project thinking ahh i jsut want to beat a GT.. Then i was like you know what.. I dont want any competition lol.. If everything goes as planned I will be doing the turbo.. Prior to the turbo if I am not mistaken I should have in the area of 365hp.. that is going based on taking manufacturer hp numbers for all the mods and taking the lowest numbers they provide.. So it came out around 365hp.. plus i have a 75 shot of nitrous going in so that will boost me to around 440... my entire goal for this setup is to get above 500 which with the turbo wont be a problem since the engine will be built to handle the power.. i could probably even go higher to to over 600hp but i am thinking i will be happy with just the nitrous for a while lol.. the most hp i have ever driven as far as cars go was my 2003 CTS which had like 240 or 260 in a heavy cadillac... i mean my truck has 345 but thats a truck.. so this should be fun...
Uhh, no way buddy. You're not making 365rwhp on an NA v6 built for a turbo. Just not happening.
__________________



2002 GT, H/C/I 4v.
Xemeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 01:37 PM   #13
Zach333
3rd Gear Member
 
Zach333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Vehicle: 2001 Sixer
Location: OREGON
Posts: 922
Default

yeah i agree with Xemeth.
you gotta get it dyno'd and stuff.... just adding up numbers like that is not a very good estimation at all ha

Not to rain on ur parade... definitely sounds like your gonna have a sick car at the end of it.... Good luck!
__________________

WTB: GT Side Scoops (any color) & Nitrous
Zach333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 01:53 PM   #14
brent4
3rd Gear Member
 
brent4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 02 Sixxer
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 695
Default

400 isn't bad do it. With your build your going to end up with a sick ride and make people jealous along the way...........
__________________


PERFORMANCE MODS:
Mac Long Tube Headers, Mac O/R H pipe, Flow 40's, SPEC Stage 2 clutch
VISUAL MODS:
01 Cobra Front w/mach 1 chin spoiler, 10th Anniversary 17" Cobra Rims, eibach lowering kit, 6k hid headlights
TO COME:
Built rear end, GT rear bumper, Saleen wing, Bilstein shock & struts, front coil-over kit, mm 4 bolt c/c plates
brent4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 02:37 PM   #15
ayrton02
4th Gear Member
 
ayrton02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 2002 Ford Mustang
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 1,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zach333 View Post
yeah i agree with Xemeth.
you gotta get it dyno'd and stuff.... just adding up numbers like that is not a very good estimation at all ha

Not to rain on ur parade... definitely sounds like your gonna have a sick car at the end of it.... Good luck!
It's called ricer math... lol.

j/k man... I'd say 240ishrwhp n/a with a fully built 4.3 w/low compression. That's being generous.
__________________

2002 3.8 V6 Mustang - MAC Longtubes, MAC o/r H-pipe,
Flowmaster Super 40s, BBK cai, SCT X-Cal 3, Eibach Pro-Kit,
Maximum Motorsports C/C plates, GT rear sway bar, front/rear
Mach 1 brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by simpsonfan13 View Post
LS1>scramjet
the new scramjet is not the new gto

Last edited by ayrton02; 06-09-2009 at 03:24 PM.
ayrton02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 06:42 PM   #16
fearthisinc
2nd Gear Member
2003 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Vehicle: 2003 Mustang Convertible
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ayrton02 View Post
It's called ricer math... lol.

j/k man... I'd say 240ishrwhp n/a with a fully built 4.3 w/low compression. That's being generous.
Like I said.. I was just going based on what the manfucturers say their product gives then subtract a few and calculate that way.. for example if they say an intake gives 10-15 i add in 7hp... I dont know about 240hp with all the mods.. i am definately going to do a before and after dyno but if i recall SSM correctly the numbers they give are dyno proven so the power pak they say gives 90hp and the shortblock they claim 30-40hp... then figure in:

- ASP Underdrive Pulley
- Exhaust
- MAC Long Tube Headers
- Throttle Body
- Intake Spacer
- Custom Tune

But all in good time.. once I get the dyno done we will see what kind of numbers i am looking at.. also i dont recall saying its was going to be 365rwhp...
fearthisinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 09:39 PM   #17
l_shizzle_l
5th Gear Member
2000 Ford Mustang
 
l_shizzle_l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 2000 v6
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
Posts: 2,384
Send a message via AIM to l_shizzle_l
Default

It's def. worth the upgrade, I got one just so I could put 4.3 badges on my car lol. What compression ratio are you going with? check this out for real estimation of RWHP numbers http://www.v6power.net/dyno/na.php
__________________
XX Under Construction XX
No longer a 232
l_shizzle_l is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 10:43 PM   #18
gif4445
3rd Gear Member
 
gif4445's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Vehicle: 2003 GT
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 895
Default

Hey, if it makes 240ish rwhp, you got a GT beat.....then put on the turbo
__________________
gif4445 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2009, 06:02 PM   #19
fearthisinc
2nd Gear Member
2003 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Vehicle: 2003 Mustang Convertible
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 327
Default

any where do you get 240? I just was talking with SSM and their 4.3l "long rod" stroker which is basically what I am getting is rated at 280-390 naturally aspirated depending on the tune.. thats not including any other mods.. so not sure where you got 240 from.. unless i am missing something..
fearthisinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2009, 06:07 PM   #20
Fink
4th Gear Member
1999 Ford Mustang
 
Fink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Vehicle: 1999 Ford Mustang
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,558
Default

But is it 280-290 rwhp?
__________________

Mods:
MAC LT's & O/R H, ROUSH Side Exhaust, GT Rear Sway, SCT X3, Auburn LSD w/ 3.27's
Waiting:
Cobra Brake Kit Front and Rear, KYB GR-2 Shocks/Struts (waiting on C/C plates)

Quote:
Originally Posted by brian1570 View Post
now RS is gonna come in here and start sh!tting on his keyboard again.
Fink is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
43, 96, pulley, putting, underdrive, worth

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company