The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 6 Cyl (V6) Applications
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-01-2009, 12:12 AM   #11
jthorn9
CSMG Moderator
 
jthorn9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Vehicle: 1995 Mustang GT, 2000 Mustang
Location: Slidell, Louisiana
Posts: 12,802
Default

The M-90 s/c is not a direct bolt on and requires a lot of fabrication to make it fit on a 94-98 single port V6. Only thing T-Bird 3.8L and the Mustang 3.8L have in common is the block itself.

If you want to supercharge your car I suggest ditching the single port design all together. You'll spend a little more cash taking this route, but you'll make much more power.

Go to a junk yard and get a 99-04 motor (or just the heads up, but it's easier to swap a motor than do an engine build in come instances).

Then go to ebay and buy an M-112 S/C kit.

Then go to supersix motorsports and buy the adaptor plate and do some research to piece together the other necessary pieces.

Next upgrade your pulley on the S/C to make more boost (M-11s makes 8 psi, but I'd up it to the 10 or 11 PSI pulley).

The 99+ motor makes 40 more hp than what you have now.

The S/C will add approx 9-12 rwhp per PSI of boost.

If you port the lower intake, and heads (lets say you don't pull the block and do an engine build), and do a mild cam swap, you could add another 30-40 rwhp ontop of what you have already.

A regular Vortech S/C for the 94-98 Mustang V6 will most likely not even push you above 200 rwhp which is why I said go with the split port setup
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
Trinity 99 Mustang SVT Cobra
Selena 95 Mustang SVO GT-40 1.5L 11PSI Kenne Bell Supercharger
jthorn9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 12:39 AM   #12
crysalis_01
2nd Gear Member
1996 Ford Mustang
 
crysalis_01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: 1996 Ford Mustang
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 320
Default

are you sure it's EVERYTHING. click the link in my sig to see if ALL of this is there. I'll gladly do some negotiation on the price, i'm willing to do some dealing.
__________________
'96 Mustang-3.8L V6 ([ASP 24%UDP]-[CAI]-[MPP 4.10's]-[FRPP T-lok]-[TransGo Shift Kit]-[Windstar split-port swap w/p&p lower])
Complete M90 for sale http://mustangforums.com/forum/sn95-...er-set-up.html


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs.Stang View Post
lol My ass is always clean before sex! lol I just don't like things entering it. I do like to have a nice smack every now and then...well, a lot really.
crysalis_01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 09:57 AM   #13
NYstang
MF Staff Snitch
1966 Chevrolet SS
 
NYstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: 02 Mustang
Location: Scotia, NY
Posts: 4,925
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jthorn9 View Post
The M-90 s/c is not a direct bolt on and requires a lot of fabrication to make it fit on a 94-98 single port V6. Only thing T-Bird 3.8L and the Mustang 3.8L have in common is the block itself.

If you want to supercharge your car I suggest ditching the single port design all together. You'll spend a little more cash taking this route, but you'll make much more power.

Go to a junk yard and get a 99-04 motor (or just the heads up, but it's easier to swap a motor than do an engine build in come instances).

Then go to ebay and buy an M-112 S/C kit.

Then go to supersix motorsports and buy the adaptor plate and do some research to piece together the other necessary pieces.

Next upgrade your pulley on the S/C to make more boost (M-11s makes 8 psi, but I'd up it to the 10 or 11 PSI pulley).

The 99+ motor makes 40 more hp than what you have now.

The S/C will add approx 9-12 rwhp per PSI of boost.

If you port the lower intake, and heads (lets say you don't pull the block and do an engine build), and do a mild cam swap, you could add another 30-40 rwhp ontop of what you have already.

A regular Vortech S/C for the 94-98 Mustang V6 will most likely not even push you above 200 rwhp which is why I said go with the split port setup
The M112 actually makes 12+psi with stock pulleys. those with 25%UDPs are still pushing 7-8psi. Rico was somewhere around 13psi when he had stockers on.
__________________

MustangForums official Randall
NYstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 04:50 PM   #14
jthorn9
CSMG Moderator
 
jthorn9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Vehicle: 1995 Mustang GT, 2000 Mustang
Location: Slidell, Louisiana
Posts: 12,802
Default

You sure about that NY, I was just in a stock Terminator a few weeks ago, and the stock boost gauge in a Termi only goes to 10 PSI, the stock unit boost at 8-10 psi (stays closer to 8).
__________________
Trinity 99 Mustang SVT Cobra
Selena 95 Mustang SVO GT-40 1.5L 11PSI Kenne Bell Supercharger
jthorn9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 04:53 PM   #15
NYstang
MF Staff Snitch
1966 Chevrolet SS
 
NYstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: 02 Mustang
Location: Scotia, NY
Posts: 4,925
Default

100%. for god knows why, puts out different numbers when matched to the 6. Im sure nathan or lilroush can tell you, but i cant.
__________________

MustangForums official Randall
NYstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 05:06 PM   #16
jthorn9
CSMG Moderator
 
jthorn9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Vehicle: 1995 Mustang GT, 2000 Mustang
Location: Slidell, Louisiana
Posts: 12,802
Default

I think I might know why. It's probably one of two factors, A.) either the crank pulley is slightly larger on a six than a Cobra, or B.) the air compresses better making more boost on the smaller engine (kind of like why a 347L stroker motor doesn't boost as high as a stock 302 does running exactly the same set up otherwise).
__________________
Trinity 99 Mustang SVT Cobra
Selena 95 Mustang SVO GT-40 1.5L 11PSI Kenne Bell Supercharger

Last edited by jthorn9; 09-01-2009 at 05:08 PM.
jthorn9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 05:23 PM   #17
RyansQuick6
Reverse Gear Member
2001 Ford Mustang
 
RyansQuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Vehicle: 02 V6 with some stuff
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 6,400
Default

It's a few factors. V6 crank pulley is larger than the cobra s/c lower. If the s/c is spinning at the same speed on both cars, then the amount of air being forced in the engine will be the same. The same volume of air and the same velocity, in a smaller space will great greater pressure.

I'm pullied to run around 8.5-9psi, but the ported lower and long tubes put that around 7.5psi.
__________________

Friggin OTards
Quote:
I learned an important lesson in the art of debate. Present your argument clearly, arm yourself with cutting wit and of course, bob and weave!
RyansQuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1998, air, automatic, car, charge, cold, intake, miles, mustang, port, sn95, split, super, supercharge, supercharging, v6, whatyou

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company