MustangForums.com - View Single Post

kalli · 07-02-2009, 08:35 AM

free and useless

1. according to this thing with all details (headflow etc) and a specific cam from em my engine makes 400+ horses. desktop dyno is more realistic with 340ish

2. the cam selection (best fit) is selected on engine ci and compression and weight. nothing else.
so even if you change the heads etc it will change the predicted HP, but the cam will remain the same, even if you re-run it.
it doens't take into consideration any gearing and driveline either.

utter crap, but colorful ..

EDIT: MATT, i saw your private message, but i have no idea how lolng it was there. forum doesn't notify. sorry.
I'm in Dublin, but I can see if I get to it when home next week

07-02-2009, 08:35 AM	#3
kalli 5th Gear Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Vehicle: 1964, Ford, Mustang Location: Cork, Ireland Posts: 4,096	free and useless 1. according to this thing with all details (headflow etc) and a specific cam from em my engine makes 400+ horses. desktop dyno is more realistic with 340ish 2. the cam selection (best fit) is selected on engine ci and compression and weight. nothing else. so even if you change the heads etc it will change the predicted HP, but the cam will remain the same, even if you re-run it. it doens't take into consideration any gearing and driveline either. utter crap, but colorful .. EDIT: MATT, i saw your private message, but i have no idea how lolng it was there. forum doesn't notify. sorry. I'm in Dublin, but I can see if I get to it when home next week __________________ 1964 1/2 302ci, Edelbrock RPM heads and cam, 650 speed demon, Long Tube headers and Flowmaster 40s Quick Performance Racing 9" rear, Moser axles, 3.5:1 trac-loc from FRPP and T5 transmission. CSRP disc brakes front and FRPP discs back. http://www.gascc.ie Last edited by kalli; 07-02-2009 at 08:42 AM.