Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion Did you see that Mustang?! Have you heard Ford's next move? Come inside.

V8 or Turbo 6.. what is the future?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 11:25 AM
  #1  
Frantz's Avatar
Frantz
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 186
From: Pennsylvania
Default V8 or Turbo 6.. what is the future?

I know we're all expecting the 5.0 for '11 but what is the word on the street for the Ecoboost? Ford has publicly stated they will have an ecoboost in every model within the next few years and I've heard talk that the GT will have a turbo 6 rather than a v8. I would cry on this day, but perhaps the "market" is ready for this move. A v8 would likely still be in shelby's, which aren't TOO much more.
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #2  
gburke1's Avatar
gburke1
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 536
From: Overland Park, Kansas
Default

I doubt Ecoboost will replace the V8... definitely not til the new MPG requirements are in effect.
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 04:39 PM
  #3  
kdf101's Avatar
kdf101
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 38
From:
Default

I really don't care what engine is in it, as long as it is fast.
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 05:37 PM
  #4  
83gtragtop's Avatar
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,897
From: DTLA, CA
Default

Both.
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 05:57 PM
  #5  
KITT's Avatar
KITT
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 136
From: Indiana
Default

yup it will be both. the v-8 will be an option..........an expensive option........ id say this will happen around 2020
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 03:44 PM
  #6  
replica's Avatar
replica
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,085
From: WA / TX
Default

Turbo cars generally require 91 octane. Also a turbo V6 isn't going to be much better than a V8 on MPG. The recent review of the SHO was showing some V8-like gas mileage.
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 05:04 PM
  #7  
THEBLACKSTANG's Avatar
THEBLACKSTANG
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,009
From: Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by replica
Turbo cars generally require 91 octane. Also a turbo V6 isn't going to be much better than a V8 on MPG. The recent review of the SHO was showing some V8-like gas mileage.
The 2010 Taurus Sho does take 91 octane but it gets much better gas mileage than a v8 17mpg city and 25mpg highway. Unless you purposely drive slow you won't get that in a v8. Its pretty close to what I get in my v6. Reviews almost always have a low [B]observed[B] fuel economy because that includes performance testing, not just everyday driving.
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 07:59 PM
  #8  
mustangcat's Avatar
mustangcat
Deputy CatDog - To Purr'tect and Explode
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,900
From: NM
Default

Originally Posted by THEBLACKSTANG
The 2010 Taurus Sho does take 91 octane but it gets much better gas mileage than a v8 17mpg city and 25mpg highway. Unless you purposely drive slow you won't get that in a v8. Its pretty close to what I get in my v6. Reviews almost always have a low [b]observed[b] fuel economy because that includes performance testing, not just everyday driving.
...Hmm?

The ratings are based EPA city/highway driving, no performance driving involved. City driving, stop and go traffic....Highway driving...Cruising at 70. No WOT turns, etc. No performance.
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 08:44 PM
  #9  
ring3r's Avatar
ring3r
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 50
From: South Dakota
Default

Originally Posted by mustangcat
...Hmm?

The ratings are based EPA city/highway driving, no performance driving involved. City driving, stop and go traffic....Highway driving...Cruising at 70. No WOT turns, etc. No performance.
Take a look at the weight of the new Taurus. It's a 4000lb car, and it gets comparable mileage to the 500 pound lighter Mustang GT, while making more power.

The same engine in the Mustang would return 2-3mpg better in the city and highway and it would be a faster car. Yeah, it'll take the slightly more expensive gasoline.

But just wait...once people start doing bolt-ons to that turbo-6...it's going to be an absolutely killer engine. Turbo applications respond VERY well to a simple intake/exhaust + tune. For example, you can take a new non-STi WRX, at 265hp, and get it up to 320hp doing nothing but intake, exhaust, and a tune, making it significantly faster than the STi....or our beloved Mustang GT.

A 365hp Turbo-6 would likely be able to reach ~430hp with just those simple modifications, plus it would have better torque characteristics than even the coyote. Of course, it won't sound the same, but interesting things can be done with the V6 noise.

Last edited by ring3r; Aug 27, 2009 at 08:51 PM.
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 08:53 PM
  #10  
blk05srt4's Avatar
blk05srt4
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 91
From: Fl
Default

Since it will be the "new age" of the next generation of cars, either way is good with for them. I would drive both the v8 and the ecoboost v6. . .



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 PM.