Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

Impressed with my buddies 944 turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #11  
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
Morbid Intentions
Thread Starter
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,312
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Demon 340
at what track did this porsche run 13.09 at 110, and with what tires?
US-131/Martin

not sure the exact model of tire but I do know they were pretty worn street radials... he can't hook up to save his life
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:42 AM
  #12  
stealth_GT's Avatar
stealth_GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,716
From: North Pole
Default

[QUOTE=Demon 340;6548063]dr, at the expense of sounding like im being over critical...when you took those pictures, did you not see that you were cutting off the front and back in the first pic, and the lf corner in the third?
QUOTE]

that made me LOL

(-:

Not sure why..

*shrugs*
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 11:19 AM
  #13  
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
Morbid Intentions
Thread Starter
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,312
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by okbfd
Interesting result. I ran one back in the day with my first GT....a bone stock 1987. We ran from 65 to 140. I got an initial jump on him and held him off by about two car lengths until the Fox started to run out of oomph and he passed me by at the very top end. My biggest laugh was when I rolled down the window to ask him how fast we were going since my speedo only went to 85 which was just shifting out of third. Of course the fact that there were actually three in the 944 turbo might have had something to do with it. The kid who was jammed in the back quit laughing and pointing when I took and kept the lead.
just read this... you ran a naturally aspirated 944, the turbo would eat a stock 5.0L for breakfast... especially from a roll

unless your buddy felt like giving you a chance and started in 2 gears up

Last edited by Morbid Intentions; Oct 7, 2009 at 11:21 AM.
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #14  
Rubrignitz's Avatar
Rubrignitz
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,897
From: TX
Default

one of my coworkers had an 85' 944 EXACTLY like drhowards. same color and looks like the same car but not as nice . we carpooled to work daily in it. good running little car but it didn't seem that quick.
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 07:45 PM
  #15  
Rubrignitz's Avatar
Rubrignitz
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,897
From: TX
Default

you SOLD this car!!?? ugh...

Originally Posted by Morbid Intentions
might be getting it back, the friend I sold it to never drove it and says it isn't worth having it around... if it's still around I'll probably buy it back in the spring

knowing my friend I would have thought he would have drove it at least a little bit... but he didn't even muster 2K on the damn thing






it would be nice to have her back though.... if everything goes as planned next spring I will have it back sitting next to the Lincoln and a 2010 harley
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 07:59 PM
  #16  
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
Morbid Intentions
Thread Starter
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,312
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Rubrignitz
you SOLD this car!!?? ugh...
more than likely getting it back now lol, so no harm no foul I suppose
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 10:02 AM
  #17  
okbfd's Avatar
okbfd
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,888
From: OK
Default

Originally Posted by Morbid Intentions
just read this... you ran a naturally aspirated 944, the turbo would eat a stock 5.0L for breakfast... especially from a roll

unless your buddy felt like giving you a chance and started in 2 gears up
This was a random race coming out of Sherman TX going towards Dallas on Hwy 75. I think the major difference was the weight factor with three of them in the 944 Turbo and only me in the Fox. Yes, specs say the 944 Turbo is a second faster in the 1/4. Unless they badged it as a turbo, it certainly wasn't a regular 944. My 87 Fox ran strong with another run with an older 928 from a dig to 80 being even.

1987 Ford Mustang GT
0-60 mph: 6.3 sec
Quarter Mile: 15.1 sec

1989 Porsche 944 Turbo
0-60mph: 6.0 seconds, 5.5s (1989 model)
0-1/4 mile: 14.2s, (1989 model)
Top Speed: 155 mph, (1989)

1980 928s
0-60 6.4
1/4 mile 14.7

So.......no......it didn't eat me for breakfast. I kept a car lead until it started slowly gaining at the top.
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 11:06 AM
  #18  
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
Morbid Intentions
Thread Starter
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,312
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by okbfd
This was a random race coming out of Sherman TX going towards Dallas on Hwy 75. I think the major difference was the weight factor with three of them in the 944 Turbo and only me in the Fox. Yes, specs say the 944 Turbo is a second faster in the 1/4. Unless they badged it as a turbo, it certainly wasn't a regular 944. My 87 Fox ran strong with another run with an older 928 from a dig to 80 being even.
I'd say stop running into crappy drivers and people playing with you then....


a stock low-mid 15 second fox isn't going to put a 2 car lead on a high 13-low 14 second car that is geared to obliterate things at highway speeds.... and it's also not going to keep even with a low-mid 14 second car (the 928)

a naturally aspirated 944 would have caught you by 100MPH easily just because the fact the car itself is geared to completely rip at highway speeds... even if it doesn't have a lot of power it's gearing will eventually pass you

you may have beat the drivers sure, but don't think for a second that your fox was faster than either... because your 1/4 mile times prove that point

EDIT: I just realized you copy and pasted magazine times

Last edited by Morbid Intentions; Oct 8, 2009 at 11:12 AM.
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 11:18 AM
  #19  
okbfd's Avatar
okbfd
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,888
From: OK
Default

SSDD in S/S *sigh* Those that want to argue about people "playing" or something not being possible when the reality is much different. I'm not a kid and have nothing to prove. What happened......happened. Those runs weren't anywhere out of the ballpark.....unlike a GTP vs a GT500
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #20  
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
Morbid Intentions
Thread Starter
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,312
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by okbfd
SSDD in S/S *sigh* Those that want to argue about people "playing" or something not being possible when the reality is much different. I'm not a kid and have nothing to prove. What happened......happened. Those runs weren't anywhere out of the ballpark.....unlike a GTP vs a GT500
you still don't understand how a 944 performs on the highway do you?

you beat the drivers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 AM.