4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Compression test results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2013, 11:10 PM
  #1  
mrz2207
Thread Starter
 
mrz2207's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 24
Default Compression test results

hi guys i have these compression results and are replacing the heads soon and want to make sure i don't need to rebuild the engine so what do you guys think.

Cylinder# dry/wet cylinders 1&3 didn't get WOT so im assuming that it
would be somewhere around 185/200
1- 170/175
2- 150/175
3- 175/195
4- 185/205
5- 185/205
6- 185/210
7- 185/200
8- 185/200
mrz2207 is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 06:17 PM
  #2  
Bman2000
4th Gear Member
 
Bman2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,501
Default

personally id be worried about number 2. id check it again make sure you got the right readings? your right on the edge of 10 percent difference between highest and lowest. i was 160-165 across the motor. so good solid numbers there, this a pi swapped motor?
Bman2000 is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 07:10 PM
  #3  
mrz2207
Thread Starter
 
mrz2207's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 24
Default

no its not, im doing a i swap soon. I really don't wanna rebuild the motor so i would hate for that to be a problem. but the wet test didn't seal like the others so i think it might be a leaking valve or maybe even a head gasket problem. Also the main reason im doing a pi swap is to fix the valve seal leakage.
mrz2207 is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 08:35 PM
  #4  
mrz2207
Thread Starter
 
mrz2207's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 24
Default

ok i re ran the test and i was right about cylinders 1&3. They are both at 185 and i re-ran #2 and got 185 dry 195 wet. so i guess there all fine. thanks for the input bman2000
mrz2207 is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 09:47 PM
  #5  
Bman2000
4th Gear Member
 
Bman2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,501
Default

that sounds much better. and honestly for the future, the wet test is really only necessary if you have lower compression on one of the cylinders. the idea behind it would be if you were 50 psi low and you wet test that one and it comes up to match then your rings are toast. if it doesn't come up then it means you need to do a leak down test because you may have a valve issue or head gasket and what not. But sounds good id say the bottom end sounds healthy. Although 180-185 seems high, so my only question would be how much is that going to go up when you pi swap, just because there is a point where the quality of fuel is just going to need to be higher to prevent issues? but maybe that's normal for non pi motor? youd have to ask someone else who knows more about normal cylinder pressures for our motors.

edit: by ok i just mean the numbers are much closer and by the rule of thumb your safe on the compression front, at least for now. im not sure why you had such a drastic increase on most of the wet tests but not all...but meh. maybe someone else will chime in.

Last edited by Bman2000; 10-08-2013 at 09:49 PM.
Bman2000 is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 10:02 PM
  #6  
mrz2207
Thread Starter
 
mrz2207's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 24
Default

The reason i did the wet test was to make sure i wasn't burning oil from the rings(because i am burning oil). i have symptoms of bad valve seals. Also my intake is leaking coolant like their known to do, so a pi swap would be best now. The compression tester could be off on the psi scale because its a cheap 40 dollar one from auto zone. Anyway thanks again for the input and help.

Last edited by mrz2207; 10-08-2013 at 11:02 PM.
mrz2207 is offline  
Old 10-09-2013, 08:36 PM
  #7  
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,621
Default

Those numbers on a cold or warm engine
uberstang1 is offline  
Old 10-09-2013, 11:05 PM
  #8  
mrz2207
Thread Starter
 
mrz2207's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 24
Default

Originally Posted by uberstang1
Those numbers on a cold or warm engine
it was warm
mrz2207 is offline  
Old 10-12-2013, 12:01 PM
  #9  
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,621
Default

Originally Posted by mrz2207
it was warm
Gotcha, was gonna say those are nice numbers cold. I just recently comp checked mine cold cause and put down 160 exact on all 8.
uberstang1 is offline  
Old 10-14-2013, 10:06 PM
  #10  
Bman2000
4th Gear Member
 
Bman2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,501
Default

thats what i had, haha didnt think about warm vs cold, good catch.
Bman2000 is offline  


Quick Reply: Compression test results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.