You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
Technically there are no "true 1964-1/2 Mustangs." I think they are titled as 65s and referred to as early 65s. But that is beside the point.
Looking at the one engine bay photo I would have to wonder what is under all that shiny paint on the body. He says the carb on the 289 was replaced with a 2bbl. Wonder if it was a 4bbl Hipo.
If it is in good shape, and the miles are true, it's a pretty good price.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members. Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
The underhood shot shows it to be a generator car. That is one of the characteristics of 64 1/2 cars, at least as far as I have ever seen. The hoods of 64 1/2's are slightly different from later 65's, but the pictures aren't at the right angle to tell anything about this car. I would be interested to know what the engine code of this car is. There are other differences for the 64 1/2's, but I can't think of the others right now.
While technically designated a '65, a '64-1/4 Mustang can be identified by the generator, louvers in the radiator support for better airflow to the generator, a non-tethered gas cap, a 260ci V-8 (F code), low compression 289 (D code), 'fold-down' lips on both front corners of the hood and maybe even a different six-banger(?). There may be other differences, but I can't recall.
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company