Classic Mustang General DiscussionMake your non-Technical threads/posts in here.
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
just curious as to how much you guys are getting out of a 289. i realize some of you diehards/mechanics are prolly getting a lot and some others are just keeping it more stock. just trying to get some type of average for that engine. and if you have a stroker 289 just mention it.
i have a 289 A code. after it comes back from the shop next week the guy said i should have somewhere in the neighborhood of 300hp.
i have added :
tri Y headers
flowmaster 40 exhaust
new carb---not exactly sure what it is
new air intake manifold
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members. Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
200 hp after all that work??? they came with 225 stock......i dont see how that is possible. i have never dynoed the car. i have raced many cars and have beat 350z , 98 style mustangs, and other sports cars that have more than 250 hp.....
I suspect that different measures of "horsepower" are being spoken here. SAE gross (225, crank), probably SAE net (190-ish), possibly a measurement at the wheels. Comparing just the numbers doesn't help until everybody is speaking the same language.
That said, I'd guess you might be up around where the K-code engine was, assuming a good rebuild and a little fine tuning of the carb and ignition. Call it 275 SAE gross/235 SAE net.
Somebody with better knowledge of what Shelby did to get a claimed 306 might be able to justify another number for you if that sort of work was also done to your engine.
Don't forget that a '65 Mustang is a relative lightweight compared to almost anything recently sold with either a V8 or 250+ horsepower. And while the 289's torque was clearly on the weak side back in the mid-60's (compared to, say, the 327 SBC), it's still going to be higher than what anybody's normally aspirated 2.7- to 3-liter V6 puts out.
'08 GT/5MT (mine)
'10 Subaru Legacy 2.5GT/6MT (hers)
'01 Maxima 20AE/5MT (spare, my occasional winter driver)
'95 626/V6/5MT (still in the family but not at this address)
ford's claimed 225 hp stock was more like 190, if that.
HP is a subject often exaggerated, sorta like the concept of why women are so bad with measurements, they've been told 5 inches in 9 inches for years.
-1994 Cobra: H/C/I, up's, smog del, fluidine cooling, carbon fiber clutch, short throw shifter, 3.55's, racing pan, 04 cobra interior, UPR front end, tubular k and a arms, coilovers, strut tower brace, full length subframe connectors, MAC control arms in the back, fr500's, drag radials, chipped and tuned by Horsepower Ranch. 327rwhp
-1966 Mustang: stripped.....ill get to it when i get some $$$
-2001 chevy pos
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware
corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford
Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor