Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs (Tech) > Classic Mustang General Discussion
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search


Classic Mustang General Discussion Make your non-Technical threads/posts in here.

Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-23-2011, 05:04 PM   #1
remicks
4th Gear Member
 
remicks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 2011 Mustang GT w/Brembo brakes
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,108
Default Falcon Question

I've been inactive in the world of classics lately and now I'm looking for a new project to get back in with. I spotted this Falcon that caught my eye and I was looking for some opinions and info on them because I don't know much other than they were the basis for the original Mustang.

The project is a '61 Falcon with a new C4 plus radiatior and what I'm going to assume is either a 144 or 170ci I6. Now I imagine it will have the same 4 lug wheels and 7.5in rear like a sixxer Mustang. Would anyone happen to know if its 3 on the tree or a floor shifter?

I've already looked up the general basis of a V8/T5 swap and it seems relatively the same as a 65/66 Mustang as well.

Anybody with experience or more knowledge on them fill me in please, wondering if this car would be a good project if I can pick it up on the cheap, opinions for price too. I was thinking of making it into something along the same vien of the Hotrod cheap paint job car down the road, http://image.automotive.com/f/techar...front_view.jpg
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg falcon1.jpg (7.2 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg falcon2.jpg (6.8 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg falcon3.jpg (7.2 KB, 9 views)
__________________
Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you. -Jeremy Clarkson
remicks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 07:57 PM   #2
hightower2011
4th Gear Member
 
hightower2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Vehicle: 1968 Ford Mustang Coupe
Location: Madison, Georgia
Posts: 1,643
Default

If it has a bench seat it's probably on the tree. Not many cars back then had the floor shifter and bench seat together. I've seen it a few times on various cars, but not many.
Looks like a cool project, I think it was JMD's son (apologies if I'm incorrect) that did a falcon recently and it looked amazing. I think they're cool cars, especially if you want a sleeper kind of look.
That hot rod paint job looks fairly good and simple too.
hightower2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 08:30 PM   #3
remicks
4th Gear Member
 
remicks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 2011 Mustang GT w/Brembo brakes
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,108
Default

Yeah, I finally got a hold of the seller and its on the tree. Set up to go see it on Tuesday. It'll be nice to have another project after selling my '67 a little over a year ago, something different for a change but still familiar.
__________________
Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you. -Jeremy Clarkson
remicks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 08:40 PM   #4
JMD
6th Gear Member
 
JMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 39 Ford
Location: AR
Posts: 5,468
Default

I dig Falcons, my son did a 64, and I have a 60 waiting in the wings.

The 6 to 8 was easy on the 64, he kept the 4 lug, and the rear will last for as long as he kind of keeps his foot out of it, so far so good though. The car rides, drives, and stops great, and in reality, the 302 with aluminum intake and heads is not going to weigh that much more than the 6 that came out.

Stock, a three speed Falcon would have had a "three on the tree".

A 61 would not have come stock with a C-4, but with a Ford-O-Matic two speed. This can be verified if there are no tranny cooler lines (or an aftermarket cooler), as the Ford-o-matic was air cooled.

I see no issues with installing a 5 speed with regard to tunnel clearance etc, and a cable clutch or hydraulic clutch ala Mustang would be easy.

I think I might have read somewhere that the first generation Falcons (60-63) might have had a slightly more narrow engine compartment than their later brethren, but I am not positive about this, and even if this is true, I don't think it would be a big issue.

My son's 64
Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.

My 60
Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.
__________________
Building cars is EASY, building cars right is a mite bit harder.


Last edited by JMD; 01-23-2011 at 08:45 PM.
JMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 08:45 PM   #5
hightower2011
4th Gear Member
 
hightower2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Vehicle: 1968 Ford Mustang Coupe
Location: Madison, Georgia
Posts: 1,643
Default

I was right^^^

Haha, I still love your son's falcon JMD, it's an phenomenal looking car!
hightower2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 09:02 PM   #6
remicks
4th Gear Member
 
remicks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 2011 Mustang GT w/Brembo brakes
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,108
Default

Wow, that is an amazing looking Falcon, I love how the body lines can be used for some nice two tone paint schemes.

Sounds like the route I'm planning, swap the engine but keep the 4 lug and play nice until an 8in swap. When reading up about the swap I think it was the 60-62 that had the narrower engine bay, the solution people came up with was to run hedman shorty headers on the 302, the stock ones were just too wide to fit.

I guess then she must have swapped the C4 in place of the two speed. Would I be wrong to assume that they would have the same bellhousing bolt pattern and input shaft because wasn't the 144, 170 and 200 basically the same engine and the 250 the same but with just a taller deck?
__________________
Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you. -Jeremy Clarkson
remicks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 09:03 PM   #7
JMD
6th Gear Member
 
JMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 39 Ford
Location: AR
Posts: 5,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hightower2011 View Post
I was right^^^

Haha, I still love your son's falcon JMD, it's an phenomenal looking car!

Thanks, I like it a lot too, Mitch did virtually all of that car on his own, styling and the build, he is going to be way better with this kind of stuff than I am...
__________________
Building cars is EASY, building cars right is a mite bit harder.

JMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 09:09 PM   #8
JMD
6th Gear Member
 
JMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 39 Ford
Location: AR
Posts: 5,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by remicks View Post
Wow, that is an amazing looking Falcon, I love how the body lines can be used for some nice two tone paint schemes.

Sounds like the route I'm planning, swap the engine but keep the 4 lug and play nice until an 8in swap. When reading up about the swap I think it was the 60-62 that had the narrower engine bay, the solution people came up with was to run hedman shorty headers on the 302, the stock ones were just too wide to fit.

I guess then she must have swapped the C4 in place of the two speed. Would I be wrong to assume that they would have the same bellhousing bolt pattern and input shaft because wasn't the 144, 170 and 200 basically the same engine and the 250 the same but with just a taller deck?
I imagine that the shorty headers would work fine, Mitch used regular old Hedman mid length headers on his 64, they fit with room to spare. Maybe some 351 swap headers would fit the bill also...

When Mitch swapped out the 2 speed he was going from 6 to 8 so he got an entire unit including the bell, flexplate, and TQ, so I am not sure about their interchangeability, but I want to thik that the bells just look different than a c-4 bell, either 6 or 8.

Mitch's plan is to go with a V-8 fox Mustang rear (4 lug) once he shatters his.
__________________
Building cars is EASY, building cars right is a mite bit harder.


Last edited by JMD; 01-23-2011 at 09:13 PM.
JMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 09:19 PM   #9
remicks
4th Gear Member
 
remicks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 2011 Mustang GT w/Brembo brakes
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMD View Post
I imagine that the shorty headers would work fine, Mitch used regular old Hedman mid length headers on his 64, they fit with room to spare. Maybe some 351 swap headers would fit the bill also...

When Mitch swapped out the 2 speed he was going from 6 to 8 so he got an entire unit including the bell, flexplate, and TQ, so I am not sure about their interchangeability, but I want to thik that the bells just look different than a c-4 bell, either 6 or 8.

Mitch's plan is to go with a V-8 fox Mustang rear (4 lug) once he shatters his.
Ah, oh well, I wouldn't be concerned with the interchangeability either, I would go straight to the 302/T5 setup more than likely.

That's a good idea with the Fox rear, didn't occur to me, be much easier to find than the old 8in by me.
__________________
Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you. -Jeremy Clarkson
remicks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2011, 08:36 AM   #10
tx65coupe
5th Gear Member
 
tx65coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: 1965 Ford Mustang
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,416
Default

Falcon's are very cool. I think you will enjoy having one.

Won't the fox body rear end be too wide?
__________________
1997 Cobra Convertible (stock)
1965 Mustang 302, T5, Versailles 9 Inch


tx65coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2011, 08:36 AM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
car, cars, custom, falcon, fit, headers, hot, job, jobs, late, model, mustang, paint, rod, shorty

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup