Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs (Tech) > Classic Mustang General Discussion
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search


Classic Mustang General Discussion Make your non-Technical threads/posts in here.

Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-16-2012, 07:52 PM   #1
69FB
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Vehicle: 1969 Fastback
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 1,394
https://www.facebook.com/brad.duckworth.773
Default Looking for opinions

My mechanic has several older mustangs that are really shells.

Since I am doing a modern suspension and drivetrain on my 69 I was thinking of buying one of the shells to put the current drivetrain in. I have a 302 (modified), a automatic overdrive transmission and a 8" rearend with posi.

There are two choices I am contemplating.

1. is a 1969 Mustang convertible that was originally Blackjade with a white top.

2. is a 1965 Fastback. The original color is Dynasty Green. Never seen a fastback in this color. I am leaning towards the fastback.

Like I stated both are rolling shells but I thought I'd ask your opinions.

Fire away on what you guys and gals would do if you had the chance.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
69FB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2012, 08:23 PM   #2
ThetaTau87
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Vehicle: 66 Ford Mustang
Location: MI
Posts: 55
Default

I've always preferred the original 65/66 Mustangs. Go for the fastback.
__________________
1966 Mustang GT coupe
ThetaTau87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2012, 09:52 PM   #3
1slow67
ROTM Moderator
 
1slow67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 2003 GT
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 7,924
jake03gt
Default

I would get the convertible
__________________
1slow67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012, 06:59 AM   #4
GT350R Klone
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: 1966 Ford Mustang Fastback
Location: ca
Posts: 461
Default

I would pencil it out if you could make more (or lose less) by just selling the motor/trans, than building up a car. Unless he sells you the shells cheap and doesnt charge much per hour, you might find you will be upside down on the project. For the equivalent in fit and finish, the fastback would sell for more.
__________________
GT350R Klone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012, 10:35 PM   #5
69FB
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Vehicle: 1969 Fastback
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 1,394
https://www.facebook.com/brad.duckworth.773
Default

Will definitely pencil out the project. I wish I could get a Marti Report on the 65. Found out last night that the tag shows two tone deluxe decor pony interior. I will definitely go with the fastback if the numbers work out.
69FB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2012, 01:09 PM   #6
smitten
 
smitten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Vehicle: 1964 1/2 D Code Coupe
Location: FL
Posts: 37
Default

Why make a choice? Do both! Oh... yeah...the time and money...
__________________
Steve

'65 Guardsman Blue 289 Coupe 5 Speed
'04 Black V-6 Coupe 5 speed
Plus 8 more that are sadly long gone!
smitten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2012, 02:27 PM   #7
JMD
6th Gear Member
 
JMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 39 Ford
Location: AR
Posts: 5,468
Default

Verts that have sat outside for a long time often have awful rust issues, I would let this help to make my decision.
__________________
Building cars is EASY, building cars right is a mite bit harder.

JMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2012, 03:28 AM   #8
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 8,162
Default

Just depends how much work both need and what body style you like more.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2012, 10:02 AM   #9
69FB
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Vehicle: 1969 Fastback
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 1,394
https://www.facebook.com/brad.duckworth.773
Default

They both are shells. The fastback has all the metal to replace what little rust there was on it. The convertible needs floors and the rest is there and just surface rust on both. I decided if the numbers work out I will do the fastback since my wife does not like convertibles and I already have a 69 sportroof.

Also my father had a 65 fastback 2+2 with factory air when my twin and I were growing up and I have fond memories of that car.

The rearend on my 69 is an 8" and my current drivetrain will bolt right in. I plan on changing everything in the 69 at some point with modern stuff anyways.
69FB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2012, 10:58 AM   #10
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 8,162
Default

The 8 inch from your 69 is a little wider then you need it will fit but the back wheels will stick out more then the front.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2012, 10:58 AM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
dynasty, green

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup