flywheel imbalance
#11
RE: flywheel imbalance
If it was originally a 289, then it is definitely 1968 or older. However, the balance is based on the crank, not the block. The block is static; the crank spins. I do not know if a 50 oz balance crank can be used in a block that originally had a crank with a 28 oz balance. There could be slight design changes to the block that would keep the cranks from being interchangeable.
#12
RE: flywheel imbalance
I think which one (28oz or 50oz) you use depends on which harmonic balancer you use, not the crank.
ORIGINAL: highhilleer
If it was originally a 289, then it is definitely 1968 or older. However, the balance is based on the crank, not the block. The block is static; the crank spins. I do not know if a 50 oz balance crank can be used in a block that originally had a crank with a 28 oz balance. There could be slight design changes to the block that would keep the cranks from being interchangeable.
If it was originally a 289, then it is definitely 1968 or older. However, the balance is based on the crank, not the block. The block is static; the crank spins. I do not know if a 50 oz balance crank can be used in a block that originally had a crank with a 28 oz balance. There could be slight design changes to the block that would keep the cranks from being interchangeable.
#13
RE: flywheel imbalance
ORIGINAL: slickman
I think which one (28oz or 50oz) you use depends on which harmonic balancer you use, not the crank.
I think which one (28oz or 50oz) you use depends on which harmonic balancer you use, not the crank.
#14
RE: flywheel imbalance
Yup, you're right. One would hope that who re-built it would stick with the period correct rotating assy.
ORIGINAL: highhilleer
You are right that the harmonic balancer and the flex plate or fly wheel must be the same balance. But selection of 28 or 50 oz is dependent on the crank, or more correctly, the whole rotating assembly, including rods and pistons. If you simply change the harmonic balancer and fly wheel from 28 oz balance units to 50 oz units, you will get a lot of vibration and damage.
ORIGINAL: slickman
I think which one (28oz or 50oz) you use depends on which harmonic balancer you use, not the crank.
I think which one (28oz or 50oz) you use depends on which harmonic balancer you use, not the crank.
#15
RE: flywheel imbalance
ORIGINAL: slickman
I think which one (28oz or 50oz) you use depends on which harmonic balancer you use, not the crank.
I think which one (28oz or 50oz) you use depends on which harmonic balancer you use, not the crank.
in short, yes, you are correct. which one you use (28 or 50) will depend on the harmonic balancer you use. either a 28oz counter balance or a 50oz counter balance depending on your crank.
lets say you have a 302 and stock, it has a 28oz imbalance. you take that 302 and stroke the motor to a 347, now you need a 50oz imbalance, nothing with the motor changed other than the bore. all you did was run different pistons, connecting rods and a crank with a slightly different stroke, requiring a larger counter balance.
all in all, your harmonic balancer's imbalance will all depend on the type of crank you are running.
#17
RE: flywheel imbalance
ORIGINAL: rmodel65
the balance changed around 82!
the balance changed around 82!
i'm not here to start crap with others. i'm here to help and learn and have a few laughs. now, all i said was, depending on the crank you use and the throw it has you may need to use a different balancer.
#19
RE: flywheel imbalance
ORIGINAL: rmodel65
not to be rude i was just didnt want someone to get the wrong one
not to be rude i was just didnt want someone to get the wrong one