newbie mistake VIN problems
#1
newbie mistake VIN problems
Well I made a newbie mistake when I purchased my Mustang a month ago. I took the owners word that it was originally a 66 C code coupe. The interior was a 66, the door plate said it was a 66, the door plate said it was a C-code, and the title said it was a 66 C-code and matched the VIN in the door.
I didn't know at the time I purchased the car that there was also a VIN on the drivers side engine compartment. It was really covered up deep with paint of whiched looked 20-30yrs old.
I finally got around to getting the paint off of the engine compartment VIN with a wire brush and sure enough it says the car is a 65 T-code.
It really threw me for a loop, because all of the suspension was for a V8 along with the fenders having the holes in the front of them for a 289 emblem. Plus the interior gauges are from a 66.
Are there any other places to look for the VIN, besides the door plate and drivers side engine compartment? Are there any more tale-tale signs that I can look for to confirm if this was really a t-code or c-code?
Also, legally, when I get ready to sale this in several years, what can I sale it as?
It ticks me off to think that I probably have an orginal t-code car, but I'm not really that discouraged. I will continue to push on in my efforts to restore the vehicle!
Thanks,
Kris
I didn't know at the time I purchased the car that there was also a VIN on the drivers side engine compartment. It was really covered up deep with paint of whiched looked 20-30yrs old.
I finally got around to getting the paint off of the engine compartment VIN with a wire brush and sure enough it says the car is a 65 T-code.
It really threw me for a loop, because all of the suspension was for a V8 along with the fenders having the holes in the front of them for a 289 emblem. Plus the interior gauges are from a 66.
Are there any other places to look for the VIN, besides the door plate and drivers side engine compartment? Are there any more tale-tale signs that I can look for to confirm if this was really a t-code or c-code?
Also, legally, when I get ready to sale this in several years, what can I sale it as?
It ticks me off to think that I probably have an orginal t-code car, but I'm not really that discouraged. I will continue to push on in my efforts to restore the vehicle!
Thanks,
Kris
#3
RE: newbie mistake VIN problems
you'd have to get the oppinions of the other members but i do know you can have another buck tag made up by someone. but the vin is the vin. you can check the engine for casting numbers and decipher them using the links in the FAQ's page maybe that would help but you still run the chance of the motor being replaced. good luck with everything, hope all works out for you!
#5
RE: newbie mistake VIN problems
Shoot. By the sounds of it....... The car is a 66 C code. it's possible that the apron was replaced with another one. I remember hearing that Ford even made mistakes with the Apron vin numbers....if i remember correctly.
#6
RE: newbie mistake VIN problems
Well, I knew when I purchased the car that the engine was not original, because it was a 302 and not a 289.
Should I even be worried about this since the engine is now a 302 and not even original any way?
Basically, I'm just wondering if I fully restore the car with the existing 302, are people going to frown upon it because it was originally a t-code car and not an original V8?
t-code = 6 cylinder
c-code = 8 cylinder
Should I even be worried about this since the engine is now a 302 and not even original any way?
Basically, I'm just wondering if I fully restore the car with the existing 302, are people going to frown upon it because it was originally a t-code car and not an original V8?
t-code = 6 cylinder
c-code = 8 cylinder
#8
RE: newbie mistake VIN problems
I hope that is the case. Is the VIN on the front apron part of the fender or is it more of the inner-structure of the engine compartment?
ORIGINAL: 6mustang6
Shoot. By the sounds of it....... The car is a 66 C code. it's possible that the apron was replaced with another one. I remember hearing that Ford even made mistakes with the Apron vin numbers....if i remember correctly.
Shoot. By the sounds of it....... The car is a 66 C code. it's possible that the apron was replaced with another one. I remember hearing that Ford even made mistakes with the Apron vin numbers....if i remember correctly.
#9
RE: newbie mistake VIN problems
ORIGINAL: wil33562
Well, I knew when I purchased the car that the engine was not original, because it was a 302 and not a 289.
Should I even be worried about this since the engine is now a 302 and not even original any way?
Basically, I'm just wondering if I fully restore the car with the existing 302, are people going to frown upon it because it was originally a t-code car and not an original V8?
t-code = 6 cylinder
c-code = 8 cylinder
Well, I knew when I purchased the car that the engine was not original, because it was a 302 and not a 289.
Should I even be worried about this since the engine is now a 302 and not even original any way?
Basically, I'm just wondering if I fully restore the car with the existing 302, are people going to frown upon it because it was originally a t-code car and not an original V8?
t-code = 6 cylinder
c-code = 8 cylinder
#10
RE: newbie mistake VIN problems
Well, you see where it is right? That is the apron. They have to be cut off... i believe to be changed. It's very possible, that the car was in a wreck, and the apron was replaced with a junkyard apron. I know my car was wrecked, because my driver side apron looks screwed up, but thank god, they didn't replace it, just fixed it alittle bit. I really wouldn't worry. I dont think somebody would go through so much trouble replacing everything to make it a 66. It doesn't make sense.