Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

289/302 300hp build up for $1500.00

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2007, 12:40 PM
  #11  
THUMPIN455
5th Gear Member
 
THUMPIN455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Marquette Mi
Posts: 3,566
Default RE: 289/302 300hp build up for $1500.00

That is a very low budget for a complete rebuild. The problem with running the used pistons and not grinding the crank is longevity. If you are building for power then you want it to last more than a year of beating on it.

Have done them both ways, reuse the stock slugs, and bore hone and new pistons. Seems like the new pistons with a balanced assembly last the longest. If you dont care and you only want an engine to putt around with, then
#1. why bother with any performance change including a cam
#2 why care how much power it makes?

So you just hone the cylinders instead of finding out how much taper they have, on the Fords we did that too ALL of them, every single one was an oil burner after the "overhaul". But of course they were truck engines not some putt around stock mustang engine, they got worked.

If you are going for power, then do it right and do it once. If you want a beater engine, do it cheapest. Blowby is not a performance enhancing quality. I would rather spend my money once than three or four times in the lifetime of the engine that has new and reconditioned parts inside.

Sorry its just the aircraft/CNC machinist in me that knows the difference between .10 and .001...
THUMPIN455 is offline  
Old 01-17-2007, 02:04 PM
  #12  
P Zero
5th Gear Member
 
P Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,986
Default RE: 289/302 300hp build up for $1500.00

ORIGINAL: THUMPIN455

That is a very low budget for a complete rebuild. The problem with running the used pistons and not grinding the crank is longevity. If you are building for power then you want it to last more than a year of beating on it.

Have done them both ways, reuse the stock slugs, and bore hone and new pistons. Seems like the new pistons with a balanced assembly last the longest. If you dont care and you only want an engine to putt around with, then
#1. why bother with any performance change including a cam
#2 why care how much power it makes?

So you just hone the cylinders instead of finding out how much taper they have, on the Fords we did that too ALL of them, every single one was an oil burner after the "overhaul". But of course they were truck engines not some putt around stock mustang engine, they got worked.

If you are going for power, then do it right and do it once. If you want a beater engine, do it cheapest. Blowby is not a performance enhancing quality. I would rather spend my money once than three or four times in the lifetime of the engine that has new and reconditioned parts inside.

Sorry its just the aircraft/CNC machinist in me that knows the difference between .10 and .001...
Im looking at the way racing engines are built. Racing engines have tolerances on the journals that would be considered out of spec on a street vehicle. And depending on the year of the motor, the pistons could very well be forged, so longevity shouldnt be an issue. Also measuring piston clearance and cylinder taper is important, but unless the cylinder walls are scored I wouldnt worry about it too much. Also, most people dont have bore guages, dial indicators or feeler guages, micrometers, etc. So my belief is that they just get it bored because they dont really know if it needs it or not.
From my personal experience, MOST engines do NOT need to be bored out. I put 70,000 hard miles on a 302 that was rebuilt the "cheap" way (re-ring,re-bearing), there was no smoke whatsoever and still doesnt smoke to this day. The only one Ive ever had smoke is when the valve stem seals hardened up, and then it only smoked on startup. Replaced em no more smoke.
Now if I was building an all out bad *** motor, yes Id do it the "right" way, but then again the block, crank, rods and pistons alone would easily cost more than double.
But really it all depends on how you run your motor. If its a drag/street motor you dont need the loose tolerances, but on something that will see sustained higher rpms you want the tolerances loose otherwise itll lock up. Aside from that even if the tolerances are a little looser you can just run a thicker oil and have no problems, and the benefit of good high heat lubrication.
-P.
P Zero is offline  
Old 01-17-2007, 06:54 PM
  #13  
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 8,007
Default RE: 289/302 300hp build up for $1500.00

if you can catch your fingernail on the ridge at the top of the cylinder, it needs to be bored. thats always a good redneck rule of thumb.
my77stang is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
svfetter
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
9
10-05-2015 11:39 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM
the5
2005-2014 Mustangs
3
09-19-2015 06:13 PM
2015Ecoboost
New Member Area
3
09-17-2015 01:48 PM
rksnow1
Motor Swap Section
0
09-14-2015 08:46 PM



Quick Reply: 289/302 300hp build up for $1500.00



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 PM.