1969 - meanest stance?
11-27-2007, 05:01 PM
#41
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,692
RE: 1969 - meanest stance?
Dang Deviousfred, is that yours? Love it, love it, love it.
For the rest, '66 was the only year, they got all the 64.5-65 bugs out and all was well with the world. After that, they spent years trying to recapture the splendor of the '66, but alas, they were never quite able to.
Geeeez, I would have thought a bunch of Mustang fanatics would have know that already ......
For the rest, '66 was the only year, they got all the 64.5-65 bugs out and all was well with the world. After that, they spent years trying to recapture the splendor of the '66, but alas, they were never quite able to.
Geeeez, I would have thought a bunch of Mustang fanatics would have know that already ......
11-27-2007, 06:45 PM
#42
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Detroit; where the weak are killed and eaten.
Posts: 2,553
RE: 1969 - meanest stance?
much like the boobies in texasaxmans avatar, small ones (like 64-66) are ok. a little bigger, a little better (67-68), a good sized handful around a c-d cup is perfect (69-70), but rollin onto DD and up (71-73) just gets to be a little gaudy.
I personally like a nice C-D cup.
But if you like cars made for training bras... thats your call.
I personally like a nice C-D cup.
But if you like cars made for training bras... thats your call.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
