Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

stance questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2007, 04:57 PM
  #1  
LastStarfighter
Thread Starter
 
LastStarfighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 8
Default stance questions

I see alot of stangs on the road with the nose looking like its slightly higher then the rear and some that have the big tires on the back and look like their doing a nose dive. What's the difference and why???
LastStarfighter is offline  
Old 12-19-2007, 04:59 PM
  #2  
dodgestang
5th Gear Member
 
dodgestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Insanity
Posts: 2,176
Default RE: stance questions

ORIGINAL: LastStarfighter

I see alot of stangs on the road with the nose looking like its slightly higher then the rear and some that have the big tires on the back and look like their doing a nose dive. What's the difference and why???
Front end higher is stock look
Rear end mucho higher and big tires with nose way down is 80s

Low and level or low and slight rake to front is modern hotness
dodgestang is offline  
Old 12-19-2007, 05:13 PM
  #3  
baddog671
6th Gear Member
 
baddog671's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MD/WV
Posts: 5,736
Default RE: stance questions

Yup, nose high is the "saggy butt" look that most people want to get rid of, nose low is "raked"...i think both can be cool if set up right
baddog671 is offline  
Old 12-19-2007, 05:26 PM
  #4  
Mustangdemon67
4th Gear Member
 
Mustangdemon67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,115
Default RE: stance questions

alot of the sagging rears i see is due to old leaf springs, that was my problem. but i guess it all depends on what the driver wants. alot of people like to lower their mustang by an inch or so, but id rather raise it a bit seeing as how ill mess up my fenders if i turn into a driveway too hard [&:]

they are low enough already as they are in my opinion, i still scrape on speed bumps sometimes even if im just rolling in neutral.
Mustangdemon67 is offline  
Old 12-19-2007, 05:26 PM
  #5  
LastStarfighter
Thread Starter
 
LastStarfighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 8
Default RE: stance questions

hmm I always like the "saggy butt" look better it looks more retro, but as far as handling and performance is there any difference. Is there a reason its higher stock?
LastStarfighter is offline  
Old 12-19-2007, 05:34 PM
  #6  
Mustangdemon67
4th Gear Member
 
Mustangdemon67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,115
Default RE: stance questions

well i didnt replace my suspension, when i bought the car the previous owner had done it already so im not sure how it handled beforehand. but i did do the leaf springs myself, i went from old 5 leaf to new 4 leaf and it raised it about 1/2 inch and it handles much better on turns (seems like it doesnt fish tail much anymore). also the ride is stiffer, i dont bounce anymore and hit my head on the roof when i go over railroad tracks.

but if your talkin about a track car, people have told me they get rear suspension from the 4 banger mustangs because they compress easier therefore providing more weight/traction to the rear wheels on a hard launch. just what ive heard, no experience with that though.
Mustangdemon67 is offline  
Old 12-19-2007, 05:34 PM
  #7  
baddog671
6th Gear Member
 
baddog671's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MD/WV
Posts: 5,736
Default RE: stance questions

ORIGINAL: LastStarfighter

hmm I always like the "saggy butt" look better it looks more retro, but as far as handling and performance is there any difference. Is there a reason its higher stock?
I bet you its easier to pull a wheelie on the "saggy butt" hahah..jk
baddog671 is offline  
Old 12-19-2007, 05:49 PM
  #8  
JamesW
Moderator
 
JamesW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northernish Eastish Central Texas
Posts: 3,302
Default RE: stance questions

Nose high means you need new rear springs...

JamesW is offline  
Old 12-19-2007, 06:23 PM
  #9  
ninteen66mustang
3rd Gear Member
 
ninteen66mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 923
Default RE: stance questions

Look at the first picture in my signature. It looks sweet, but its just cuz there are 6 people crammed in it. My tire was rubbing on the fender on every bump. It looks sweet tho!
ninteen66mustang is offline  
Old 12-19-2007, 06:36 PM
  #10  
dirtydave289
3rd Gear Member
 
dirtydave289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 586
Default RE: stance questions

Yeah my headers scrape on everything

it's annoying as hell!
even my driveway (really long and gravel)
it seems to be 99.9% level but my headers find places to scrape
dirtydave289 is offline  


Quick Reply: stance questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 PM.