Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

DOHC in 66

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2008, 10:29 AM
  #21  
Angliagasser
2nd Gear Member
 
Angliagasser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 172
Default RE: DOHC in 66

Because the guy does not know what he is talking about when it comes to the Mustang II suspension! It is a great up grade to any early mustang. If it is as big a piece of crap as the guy says it is then Heidt's and all those other companies that make this suspensionwould be out of business from being sued all the time for the cars falling apart!
They call it an up grade for a reason. That old suspension was not all that great. If it was, they would be building kits to put it in other car like they do with the Mustang II.
Angliagasser is offline  
Old 01-25-2008, 03:24 PM
  #22  
ozarks06
2nd Gear Member
 
ozarks06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MO
Posts: 439
Default RE: DOHC in 66

ORIGINAL: andrewmp6

The reason i say that is a ackerman b it puts all weight on the frame rails when ford designed these cars the firewall was where the went went.And most people that use the mustang 2 kit run a support tube from the front of the frame rail to the firewall like this http://www.martzchassis.net/page3.htm or go for something like this http://www.fatmanfab.com/catalogpage.php?page=22
Actually the M2 puts the engine weight (the heaviest part on the front of the car) directly on the crossmember, which, unlike in avintage Mustang suspension, puts that directly on the wheels. Thus, there is probably less weight on the frame rails,aprons and firewallthanwith the stock suspension. You still have the aprons which carry some of the weight (though probablysubstantially less) directly to the firewall,though you are missing the heavy-guage metal in the shock towers (but with less weight on the aprons, is that needed?).

As for handling, here's a post onanother forumfrom a guy who has a real Mustang II - the car - and gets great handling out ofa modifiedfactory suspension - .99G lateral. http://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sho...ight=heidt%27s

As for mod-motor performance, it takes a lot of money and work to get a 289 to perform anywhere near a bone stock 4.6 DOHC (281 ci) motor (even the Mark VIII motors). The Mark VIII motors (285 HP net) make 50% more horsepower than the A-code 289 4V (225 HP gross~ 195 HP net vs 285 HP net for the Mark VIII). With a little tuning and some tweaking, astock01 Cobra N/A motor (maybe with headers)can make 350 HP at the flywheel pretty easily (and a 289 willreally need work and $$$ to see that short of a blower or nitrous.Shelby's modifiedK-codes only made 306 gross~ 260 HP net). It eventakeswork (and $$$)to get 350 HP from a 5.0/302. Sure a 429 will make more power and a 351 can do that too, but neither will get 26 MPG at 70 MPH and idle like a kitten. It's all in the heads (and engine management).But they are expensive to build - I know!
ozarks06 is offline  
Old 01-26-2008, 02:19 AM
  #23  
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
andrewmp6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 8,162
Default RE: DOHC in 66

Yeah thats the specs on a mustang 2 don't mean you'll get those numbers by welding in the suspension on a different car.I could get 26mpg out of a 460 have to be a diesel tho.
andrewmp6 is offline  
Old 01-26-2008, 07:00 AM
  #24  
67 evil eleanor
5th Gear Member
 
67 evil eleanor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,106
Default RE: DOHC in 66

"ozarks06" very well stated, I will follow the link you listed, it seems that the M2's can hang in with best of them. It also seems a little tweaking goes a long way. I was surprised to see them near the 1 G lateral. Thats pretty impressive.
67 evil eleanor is offline  
Old 01-26-2008, 02:08 PM
  #25  
03Maverik
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
03Maverik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 222
Default RE: DOHC in 66

Sounds to me that there isn't a problem with installing a MII front clip. I was talking to a buddy today about finding a wrecked Cobra for the donor. I think I might be on to something. Thanks for the information ozarks66 and 67 evil eleanor. You guys have helped me with some decisions. Now I just gotta figure out if it is affordable for my budget. We'll SEE!!!!
03Maverik is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rdog69t
SVT Forums
0
09-13-2015 06:16 PM
Aixtreme89
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
05-01-2005 02:03 AM
td1989
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
04-19-2005 10:53 PM
DOHC330MustanGT
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
0
09-13-2004 02:54 PM
Jason in LA
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
14
04-27-2004 11:19 AM



Quick Reply: DOHC in 66



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 AM.