Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Back from the dyno :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2009, 10:37 PM
  #1  
_Remi
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
_Remi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 322
Default Back from the dyno :)

Hi friends,

I am back from the dyno and here are the results! The two first runs showed 240 and 241 rwhp and indicated that I was running too rich (AF between 10.5 and 11.5 in the 4000 -> 5500 RPM range). Then changed the jets and played with the timing, it went to 256. They were convinced that they could get more and noticed that my air filter was small / bad quality. They changed it to a 3" (as opposed to the 2" I had) and it went to 269 rwhp which is the final score They double checked and go the same result after 5 minutes.

I had a great time and I guess I can admit now that my 289 is really healthy! For those interested, everything is in my signature.

Not bad

Here is a quick video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxJj4TqoxoM

Thanks!
_Remi is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 10:40 PM
  #2  
racin66coupe
5th Gear Member
 
racin66coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 3,485
Default

nice!!!
i hear the whining in the rear though i think, def get it checked out
racin66coupe is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 10:47 PM
  #3  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

7 more rwhp than I figured, haha.

Not bad. What was the tq and what was the AFR at peak power/torque?
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 10:49 PM
  #4  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

That whining is the roller for the dyno, btw. Some of them are freakin LOUD.
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:43 AM
  #5  
_Remi
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
_Remi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 322
Default

Originally Posted by 67mustang302
7 more rwhp than I figured, haha.

Not bad. What was the tq and what was the AFR at peak power/torque?
The torque was 279 at 4050 and above 250 pretty much all the time. AF ratio was around 11.8 I believe at peak hp.
_Remi is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 04:09 AM
  #6  
kalli
6th Gear Member
 
kalli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 6,417
Default

Hi Remi,

that's great news. you are at about 75% of what desktop dyno predicted for engine. Since that is not BHP and you measure rear wheels it seems quite accurate to me.
Although the desktop dyno predicted peak torque at 4250, not 4050. What was the rpm @ peak HP? 5500rpm?
Can you post the resultsheet and I'll upload the desktop dyno for your car so we can compare the difference. I'd be interested to see that on real life example
What I find mad is that everyone had it in the same 20+-HP area :-)

.... and of course congratulations!

Kalli
kalli is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:59 PM
  #7  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

11.8 is way too rich for best power in a n/a engien. If the engine will tolerate it, you need to be at 12.5-13.0:1.
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 07:05 PM
  #8  
kalli
6th Gear Member
 
kalli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 6,417
Default

that 11.8 was probably before the tuning
kalli is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 07:17 PM
  #9  
htwheelz67
3rd Gear Member
 
htwheelz67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 572
Default

yes leaning it to 13.0-13.8 could yield even more, so your making over 1hp per cube fwhp thats a strong but mild mannered 289, you should pull really good mpg's hwy as well.....good job! The combo works well.......get rid of those "slowmasters" and I would bet you could pick up another 15hp with good muffs.

Last edited by htwheelz67; 05-08-2009 at 07:19 PM.
htwheelz67 is offline  
Old 05-09-2009, 04:31 AM
  #10  
kalli
6th Gear Member
 
kalli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 6,417
Default

I'd say that thing is 330flywheel (without power robbers like alt etc) maybe just over 300BHP?
kalli is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OSUTX440
Ohio Regional Chapter
5
10-04-2015 09:39 PM
spamedic
2005-2014 Mustangs
2
09-09-2015 12:15 AM
raleigh05GTO
New Member Area
5
09-04-2015 07:09 AM
cbird1177711
2005-2014 Mustangs
3
09-02-2015 08:51 PM
cbird1177711
2005-2014 Mustangs
0
09-02-2015 04:12 PM



Quick Reply: Back from the dyno :)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 AM.