Retro Fit Roller Cam - Page 2 - MustangForums.com


Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-06-2010, 11:07 AM   #11
69mach1377
5th Gear Member
 
69mach1377's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ABQ, NM, USA
Posts: 2,530
Default

Yes BD, and JMD. I guess I slept while these came out. Used to be you needed the Crane(?) conversion kit.
$318 for the Howard Cams lifter set seems to be most affordable. Anybody use those ones?
69mach1377 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 11:58 AM   #12
frdnut
2nd Gear Member
 
frdnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 493
Default

I am running a solid roller cam in my 408 but its the same idea..Converted it to a roller using comp cams linked lifters...Perhaps not an issue in a mild build but the reduced base circle cams can flex in a high performance app with strong spring pressures...I also like the fact that I have much more camshaft options this way...
frdnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 12:27 PM   #13
mpa5008
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6
Default

thanks for all the input, looks like i'm leaning towards the Comp Cams Magnum 260 HR.
mpa5008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2010, 07:03 PM   #14
.boB
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location:
Posts: 939
Default

The only differance between a roller and no-roller block is the height of the lifter bores. The roller lifters are esswentially the same thing as a non-roller, but with a wheel on the bottom. WHich makes them longer. To get proper oiling, Ford made the lifter bores taller.

To make the conversion, you have two options:

1. Use stock ford lifters, spider and dog bones. That's where the reduced base circle cam comes in. The smaller base allows the lifters to sit lower in the bores, and get oiled properly.
As said above, you need to drill and tap two small holes in the lifter valley. That's easy. The other issue is getting the dog bones to sit flat on the top of the bores. Most blocks will need to be clearanced a little bit for the dog bones. Again, an easy operation that can be done with a hand grinder.
But, some blocks have as cast or irregular areas at the top of the lifter bores. These will have to be carefully machined flat.

2. The second option is to use any roller cam, and link bar lifters.

Option is usually cheaper, if you don't need machining of the lifter bore tops. But option 2 is easier.

Don't forget to measure for proper push rod length.
.boB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 01:06 PM   #15
69mach1377
5th Gear Member
 
69mach1377's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ABQ, NM, USA
Posts: 2,530
Default

So for option 2, does the rod length basically decrease based on the difference in height of the std vs. roller lifters?
Option 1 seems better for a new or rebuild with the engine on a stand whereas option 2 may be better for an in-car swap.
69mach1377 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 02:07 PM   #16
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,465
Default

Pushrod length always has to be checked on a per application basis.
67mustang302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 03:59 PM   #17
69mach1377
5th Gear Member
 
69mach1377's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ABQ, NM, USA
Posts: 2,530
Default

Yeah, but you gotta be in the ballpark to begin with.
I thought it was a simple question.
69mach1377 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 10:52 AM   #18
.boB
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location:
Posts: 939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69mach1377 View Post
So for option 2, does the rod length basically decrease based on the difference in height of the std vs. roller lifters?
Option 1 seems better for a new or rebuild with the engine on a stand whereas option 2 may be better for an in-car swap.
With link bar lifters the push rod length is usually decreased. The lifters are considerably taller than stock.

With a reduced base circle cam and stock lifters (option 1), the push rod length is pretty close to stock.
.boB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 11:07 AM   #19
69mach1377
5th Gear Member
 
69mach1377's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ABQ, NM, USA
Posts: 2,530
Default

That's what I was thinking, the pushrod length decreases as much as the lifter height increases, as a starting point.
69mach1377 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 07:28 PM   #20
super64
1st Gear Member
 
super64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 55
Default

I went with a Trick Flow Stage One roller cam with Howard's link bar lifters. Couldn't be happier!
super64 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Snow performance stage 2 MAF boos cooler install jwog666 Pipes, Boost & Juice 5 04-04-2016 05:23 PM
Any tuner available 95 3.8 ?? patchshaffer Tuner Central 3 10-05-2015 03:24 PM
So who wins uedlose The Racers Bench 4 10-01-2015 09:31 PM
4 Valve Head questions GimpyHSHS 4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang 6 10-01-2015 10:01 AM
Colgan Custom Bra for 2014 Mustang mdg Parts For Sale 0 10-01-2015 08:04 AM


Tags
1968, 289, 2v, 351c, 46, cam, cams, comp, fit, ford, howard, hydraulic, mustang, options, retro, retrofit, roller

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 PM.