When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
What is the differences between a 67 and a 68? what did the come out with in 68 that werent in 67? which one is more rare? which one is stronger and more reliable? i will buy on in the future and doing my best to do my research on it before i spend to much money for the wrong thing
The 67 and 68 were almost identical. Small trim items were most of it. The only significant things were safety upgrades on the 68, including collapsible steering column, shoulder belts, low-profile door handles and dash *****, breakaway rearview mirror mount, seat back latches, padded seat tops, etc.
I'm a fan of 67's. There are several things I don't like about 68's. The steering wheel, front seats and side markers. I like first years of body styles change and feel they retain more value, unless you buy a rare 68 1/2 428 car.
69 fastbacks seem to be worth quite a bit more then a 65, 66, 67, 68 fastbacks something about the styling.
I would go for a 69, though all years are awesome.
69 fastbacks seem to be worth quite a bit more then a 65, 66, 67, 68 fastbacks something about the styling.
.
I would disagree if we are just talking a bare bones fastback..The eleanor craze has put the 67s into crazy money...If you can't find a 67 the 68 is a very close next best thing for that purpose...
The 69 and 70s do have some very expensive models when you consider the boss and CJ models..The 69s are a little more "muscular" looking in my opinion.