Search



Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs (Tech)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-06-2011, 04:01 PM   #1
gearbanger
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Vehicle: 1990 5.0
Location: CA
Posts: 1,836
Default New to the old school scene. build help?

Hey hows it going guys. Havent been on this site for a long time. Use to have a 90 lx with a 347 stroker. long story short its no longer around. I picked up this 1968 Mustang try and do something different. I have never worked with carbed cars and want to know some fact and opinions on the build i want to do. If i posted in the wrong area I apologize it has been awhile.

this is what the car has right now.

351w
hooker long tubes
ededbrock intake and carb
erson 1.6 rockers
9 inch rear with locker
and a c6 tranny
got car dynoed to get a baseline. it made 186rwhp and 255tq (i guess its ok?) peak power between 2300-3500 then starts to drop. max rpm 4700

my goal is a 600+ hp motor
408 stroker with a T trim or ysi trim backed by a t56
questions are will a special carb be needed? what fuel systems will you recommend? Like i said im completely new to this. Car has leaf springs can those still be used for drag? if not what can I use? I have owned nothing but fox bodies my whole life so excuse me if the questions are noobish lol. also suspension whats good and what isnt?

here is a pick of the new project
Click the image to open in full size.

thx for any input guys.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________


Mods: 347, Port Matched afr 185's, rpm2 intake, custom cam, bbk 1 3/4 Lt's, and all supporting mods
gearbanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 04:27 PM   #2
MustangFTW
Anime Club President

 
MustangFTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Vehicle: your mother
Location: MFOT
Posts: 1,381
Default

Looks clean, might want dual quads. Although one big quad should work fine. If you go for the single quad I would do 6~700 cfm.

As for suspension I would stay away from the gas adjustable ones, seems a lot of guys around here don't care for them.by quad I mean 4 barrel Carb. Some guys run multiple carburetors if they plan in spinning the engine to 8 grand.
MustangFTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 04:57 PM   #3
gearbanger
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Vehicle: 1990 5.0
Location: CA
Posts: 1,836
Default

I dont plan on spinning the engine pass 65-6800.
__________________


Mods: 347, Port Matched afr 185's, rpm2 intake, custom cam, bbk 1 3/4 Lt's, and all supporting mods
gearbanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 06:12 PM   #4
MustangFTW
Anime Club President

 
MustangFTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Vehicle: your mother
Location: MFOT
Posts: 1,381
Default

single 4 barrel carburetor should work nicely. Sorry about the state of my first post, i was on my phone.....

i would definitely not go below 600 cfm, not sure if 600 is too little considering you want to spin it at 6500. might want to wait till a couple more guys give their opinion, in the mean time you can drool over these beauties:
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_.../thunder.shtml
__________________
MustangFTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 08:07 PM   #5
gearbanger
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Vehicle: 1990 5.0
Location: CA
Posts: 1,836
Default

Thanks for the link! i got a lot to learn about these carbs. it has a edelbrock carb now but no idea what size. i doubt it will be enough for a supercharged 408 stroker. Does anyone still use leaf springs for drag racing? lol. These are the heads i decided on getting. pricy but worth it imo.. http://www.trickflow.com/partdetail....1&autoview=sku
__________________


Mods: 347, Port Matched afr 185's, rpm2 intake, custom cam, bbk 1 3/4 Lt's, and all supporting mods
gearbanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 08:20 PM   #6
MustangFTW
Anime Club President

 
MustangFTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Vehicle: your mother
Location: MFOT
Posts: 1,381
Default

Could you get a part number or id off of it? Most carbs have some sort of tag. Missed the supercharged part lol, definitely want bigger then 600, i'm thinking 800 would be better.
MustangFTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 11:24 PM   #7
JMD
6th Gear Member
 
JMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 39 Ford
Location: AR
Posts: 5,468
Default

I think 600 HP is going to want at least a 750 cfm carb, without actually researching, I imagine a bit more than that.

If you get some super stiff springs like the Grab-A-Track 5s, the leafs will do ok, but if you are talking some serious racing, you will want something better.

I have a 408W in my 39, all forged, H-beans, Vic Jr Heads, mild cam (E303) and an Edelbrock ProFlo2 fuel injection, it ain't 600 horses, probably more like 425, but it will spin the **** out of my 15" wide M/T drag radials and do do-nuts at will..

My son has a similar 408 in his 65, bigger cam (a lot bigger) and carbed though. I imagine he was pulling 500 HP = or + a little before he de-tuned by moving to a smaller carb.

HP is easy for these motors with good heads. For a 600 HP Windsor, I highly recommend Edelbrock Vic Jr. Heads, I run em and I like em.

A few weeks ago my son put a FAST "Retro" fuel injection computer and harness on "stock" 80's-90's 5.0 ford fuel injection hardware. I will have to admit to being impressed. For the money it is an effective, easy, and relatively cheap route to fuel injection. It runs really well, and makes more power than the carb it replaced.
__________________
Building cars is EASY, building cars right is a mite bit harder.


Last edited by JMD; 12-06-2011 at 11:30 PM.
JMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011, 12:02 AM   #8
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 8,162
Default

I would pass on the c6 for a c4 they can be beefed up just as good or you got the money lentech makes a nice aod thats rated to like 800hp.And that much power sub frame connectors are a must and think about a 6 point cage also.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011, 01:00 AM   #9
rtintwo
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Vehicle: 1970 Mach 1
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 475
Default

The car looks clean in the pic and your in CA so hopefully rust is minimal but with the classics and the power you are talking you should give the underside a very close look. With the power levels you are talking about you need to make sure you have a solid base to start with.

Once you know the underside is solid i would look at subframe connectors, export brace and other ways to stiffen the body. In the 600+ range you are going to be losing rear wheel power to body twist. The 400 range i wouldnt worry about it but 600+ it can start to happen.

Rear leafs are ok for strip but take the slapper traction bars off and look at some of the other set ups that are available. There are some that bolt to the body and some that are welded. Both set ups will do good for you and alot better than the slappers that are on it now. Also stay away from the air adjustable shocks. They take the weight of the car off the springs and put it on the shocks. The transition pan (where the top of the shocks bolt) isnt strong enough to take the weight of the body and will crack.

Front suspension. My opinion is that fresh rubber on everything(not poly) and shelby drop(easy mod) and roller perches will give some great steet handling with out breaking the bank. There are coil over setups and the mustang II suspension kits available but they arent cheap and in my opinion are more for a road race car rather than the strip car you are talking about.

As far as working on a carb it is pretty simple to do and once you get some experience with them you will love them. Go ahead and buy a vacuum gauge, timing light and a tach now(need to be able to see it from the eng bay), these will be your primary tools for tuning at home. Any problems you need help with then post them up and somebody will be able to help. 600+ i would be thinking 750cfm to start with.
rtintwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011, 08:12 AM   #10
JMD
6th Gear Member
 
JMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 39 Ford
Location: AR
Posts: 5,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewmp6 View Post
I would pass on the c6 for a c4 they can be beefed up just as good or you got the money lentech makes a nice aod thats rated to like 800hp.And that much power sub frame connectors are a must and think about a 6 point cage also.

+1 on the C-4, smaller, lighter, easier, and they can be made very strong....
__________________
Building cars is EASY, building cars right is a mite bit harder.

JMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011, 08:12 AM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
1990, 408w, 50, 600, bars, cheap, edelbrock, find, ford, fuel, hp, injection, jr, mustang, school, slapper, vic

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup