Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

300hp 289?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2012, 10:41 PM
  #1  
Bullitt117
Thread Starter
 
Bullitt117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kansas
Posts: 12
Default 300hp 289?

is it possible to squeeze 300 reliable horsies out a 289 naturally aspirated? I will not be stroking it, but I will be boring the cylinders. and please please don't tell me to swap in a 302.. cuz its not happening. i am keeping the 289 and thats that. I will be doing a complete rebuild on the motor. do you think I could get close to 300hp (flywheel) out of it? and how?

Last edited by Bullitt117; 02-27-2012 at 09:10 AM. Reason: type-o
Bullitt117 is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 11:05 PM
  #2  
MonsterBilly
4th Gear Member
 
MonsterBilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 1,674
Default

Dude, FYI the 289 and the 302 are identical in every way other than the crank. It is the very same block, no difference at all. All ford did was put a crank in the 289 engine with a 1/4" longer stroke and BAM! the 302 was created.

Actually my friend you can easily get 300 Hp out of a 289. infact its not too hard to get close to 400hp out of it. All you need is ARP bolts and studs so the internals can handle the RPMs , a great set of good flowing heads (IE Trick Flow, AFR, Dart, Edelbrock RPM) and a good intake manifold and a good tuned carb.. There you have it. wind it up and let it rip.....
MonsterBilly is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 01:54 AM
  #3  
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
andrewmp6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 8,162
Default

Shelby got a little bit over 300hp out of the 289 it can be done.
andrewmp6 is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 05:39 AM
  #4  
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
2+2GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 5,232
Default

Dead easy. A guy near here followed my advice, put a C9OZ-6250-C cam in his 67 289. His iron heads sucked even worse than usual, so he port-matched the exhaust (his first engine job!) used a 600 cfm carb on a Performer RPM intake, and stock distributor tuned to BOSS 302 specs. Engine turned 323.5 hp @ 5300 rpm.

289/302 Cylinder Head Port Matching
2+2GT is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 07:14 AM
  #5  
Bullitt117
Thread Starter
 
Bullitt117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kansas
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by MonsterBilly
Dude, FYI the 289 and the 302 are identical in every way other than the crank. It is the very same block, no difference at all. All ford did was put a crank in the 289 engine with a 1/4" longer stroke and BAM! the 302 was created.

Actually my friend you can easily get 300 Hp out of a 289. infact its not too hard to get close to 400hp out of it. All you need is ARP bolts and studs so the internals can handle the RPMs , a great set of good flowing heads (IE Trick Flow, AFR, Dart, Edelbrock RPM) and a good intake manifold and a good tuned carb.. There you have it. wind it up and let it rip.....
haha yea sorry I should have said no 5.0 HO's. I've had so many people to tell me to swap to one its not funny. it may be cheaper and more powerful, but I'm keeping my 289.

and awesome, most of that stuff is already on my list. the things I'm limited on are cam and heads. I won't be able to get a really radical cam because of my granny gears that are currently in the car. and most aluminum heads are out of my immediate budget. in a few years I will be swapping the gears and putting in a t5, so I won't be limited on the cam anymore after that.

basically, my goals for the car are simply to be able to put down a 99-04 mustang gt (mostly stock) if one happens to want to play. I won't be racing it all the time.

I found a set a of 351w heads for $150 but it looks like they need work.

Last edited by Bullitt117; 02-27-2012 at 09:38 AM.
Bullitt117 is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 09:53 AM
  #6  
oldrock
2nd Gear Member
 
oldrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: texas
Posts: 190
Default

300hp on a 289 is very achievable. My buddy did a rebuild on his 66 with a 289 and got just over 300hp. All it took is a new cam, port and polish job, new pistons bored 20 over, new intake, long tube headers with dual exhaust. Car ran great... not rubber shredding torque but great acceleration and spirited performance.
oldrock is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 10:43 AM
  #7  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default

pick up a set of 1996-97 GT40 heads from an explorer and port match them they flow better than the 1969-70 351w heads people run....add a nice cam intake etc and youll be in business
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 01:12 PM
  #8  
jojobanks
2nd Gear Member
 
jojobanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: AL
Posts: 446
Default

Originally Posted by 2+2GT
Dead easy. A guy near here followed my advice, put a C9OZ-6250-C cam in his 67 289. His iron heads sucked even worse than usual, so he port-matched the exhaust (his first engine job!) used a 600 cfm carb on a Performer RPM intake, and stock distributor tuned to BOSS 302 specs. Engine turned 323.5 hp @ 5300 rpm.

289/302 Cylinder Head Port Matching
did he have to machine his stock heads for screw-in studs to accommodate the Hi-Po cam? i assume so considering the Hi-po heads come stock with screw in studs.
jojobanks is offline  
Old 02-28-2012, 12:27 AM
  #9  
musnicki
3rd Gear Member
 
musnicki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 959
Default

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-2091/

Is what I bought for my 289 ala stroked out 306...hehe, anyways, it's suppose to be about 375hp and will probably net you 300 to the wheels. $1800 is what I paid for four years ago, kinda weird that the price hasn't budged.

James
musnicki is offline  
Old 02-28-2012, 08:45 AM
  #10  
MonsterBilly
4th Gear Member
 
MonsterBilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 1,674
Default

JOJO

if you install a aftermarket cam with higher lift and more duration on the valves into a engine with stock heads you will also need to install heavier springs that are matched to the cam. When you install these springs they have a lot more strength to them. The stock for press in rocker studs DO NOT have the strength to hold under this tension and they will pull out.

SEARCH MY THREADS AND YOU WILL SEE A BIG WRITE UP ON STOCK HEADS AND WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO TO GET THEM WHERE THEY NEED TO BE TO FLOW BETTER AND HOLD UP TO TOUGHER SPRINGS. You will see that it takes almost as much as buying a set of aluminum heads.

-port matching
-removing studs
-mill heads at stud mounting areas
-thread and install screw in studs
-install guide plates
-drill out holes for push rods
-install hardened push rods

If you look at the cost of the machine work (although the port matching can be done at home with the right tools) you are looking at about $800. YOu can get a really nice set of trick flow heads or Edelbrock RPM heads for about $1100.
You will still be nowhere close to the perfomance with the iron heads as you will be with the aluminum.
351 heads will get you a lot of performance with a straight bolt on.


Also, why is the term HiPo being used so much in this thread. Are you all referring to the Ford HiPo products or just throwing it around?

And Bullit , You stated in another post that oyu have GRanny Gears in your rearend. Low gears are great in these high RPM engines. Before you say you are going to throw in a T5 and switch to a "higher Gear" please post what gears you currently have. It should be on a small tab located on one of the rear end housing bolts.

I switched to a "LOWER" gear, i went with 3.73 gears and in fact i wish they were a little lower.

And FYI i will line up against any newer mustang in a minute. My car hauls butt from 0-80mph after that i am fine with the T5 overdrive.
MonsterBilly is offline  


Quick Reply: 300hp 289?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 AM.