thinking about aluminum heads...need some input
#61
You can't pick a cam based on how you want it to sound. That's counter-productive, especially in your case. You've been asking from the get-go for a package that gets you good fuel efficiency, which means good low-end torque and throttle response. A cam that lopes does so because of valve overlap, which is a byproduct of a cam that makes power at high rpm's, which is exactly the opposite of what you're trying to achieve.
If you wanted a package that would be an awesome street driver with good mid-range torque and a lot of top-end power, I would've started with the TFS heads and a much more aggressive cam in the first place.
If you wanted a package that would be an awesome street driver with good mid-range torque and a lot of top-end power, I would've started with the TFS heads and a much more aggressive cam in the first place.
#62
This is the cam that lunati recommended
http://www.lunatipower.com/Product.aspx?id=1669
Mr. Velocity
what cam are those specs for?
thanks again guys
-Gun
http://www.lunatipower.com/Product.aspx?id=1669
Mr. Velocity
what cam are those specs for?
thanks again guys
-Gun
#63
You can't pick a cam based on how you want it to sound. That's counter-productive, especially in your case. You've been asking from the get-go for a package that gets you good fuel efficiency, which means good low-end torque and throttle response. A cam that lopes does so because of valve overlap, which is a byproduct of a cam that makes power at high rpm's, which is exactly the opposite of what you're trying to achieve.
If you wanted a package that would be an awesome street driver with good mid-range torque and a lot of top-end power, I would've started with the TFS heads and a much more aggressive cam in the first place.
If you wanted a package that would be an awesome street driver with good mid-range torque and a lot of top-end power, I would've started with the TFS heads and a much more aggressive cam in the first place.
#64
I agree...although you may have power goals I think the sound and feel is more important unless you are racing. I changed my carb and mufflers recently and now I miss my old sound even though the car runs better and gets 3-4mpg more. I am sure you will love your new power gains regardless of what the exact numbers on a dyno turn out to be.
#66
Starfury
agreed the rpm range seems too high. I think I would be better suited with the trickflow cam vs that particular voodoo cam.
the advertised lift seemed a bit on the high side as well
agreed the rpm range seems too high. I think I would be better suited with the trickflow cam vs that particular voodoo cam.
the advertised lift seemed a bit on the high side as well
#67
This is the cam that lunati recommended
http://www.lunatipower.com/Product.aspx?id=1669
Mr. Velocity
what cam are those specs for?
thanks again guys
-Gun
http://www.lunatipower.com/Product.aspx?id=1669
Mr. Velocity
what cam are those specs for?
thanks again guys
-Gun
#68
think I would be better off by switching plans? What if rather than trying to find a roller cam to fit the trick flow 61 cc heads I went with the 58cc heads that starfury recommended http://www.trickflow.com/partdetail....8&autoview=sku
but had comp custom grind me a roller cam that would work with stock pistons? Im not sure if that would work because of the limited available valve lift. I also dont know what the maximum lift is that one could use with stock pistons and those heads.
any ideas about that? or should I just have comp custom grind me a roller cam for the 61 cc heads like I have been considering...either way a custom ground cam sounds cool...
-Gun
but had comp custom grind me a roller cam that would work with stock pistons? Im not sure if that would work because of the limited available valve lift. I also dont know what the maximum lift is that one could use with stock pistons and those heads.
any ideas about that? or should I just have comp custom grind me a roller cam for the 61 cc heads like I have been considering...either way a custom ground cam sounds cool...
-Gun
#69
okay so after looking all this over and talking again with a comp tech....
right now I want to run the xtreme energy xr270rf-hr (PN: 35-421-8) cam and the trick flow heads with 61cc combustion chambers (as listed before)
I think this is a pretty dang close match to what I'm looking for
compared to the trick flow cam I think this maybe more aligned with my goals for adding HP but not hurting fuel mileage and still sounding like it has a cam in it...
I also plan to run the comp link bar lifters.
Any other suggestions?
-Gun
right now I want to run the xtreme energy xr270rf-hr (PN: 35-421-8) cam and the trick flow heads with 61cc combustion chambers (as listed before)
I think this is a pretty dang close match to what I'm looking for
compared to the trick flow cam I think this maybe more aligned with my goals for adding HP but not hurting fuel mileage and still sounding like it has a cam in it...
I also plan to run the comp link bar lifters.
Any other suggestions?
-Gun
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Luke9222
4.6L General Discussion
19
10-22-2015 11:55 PM