Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

66 mustang project

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-11-2012, 08:31 PM
  #1  
98mustangkidd
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
98mustangkidd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 147
Default 66 mustang project

Just thought id drop in and tell everyone about what i am building, its a father and son project. i got the car for graduation and I am really big into mustangs. Most of the time I am on the other section of this forum for my 98 mustang. But anyway the car is a 66 mustang coupe 289.

I am actually at a dilemma right now about the motor, it has a 289 torn out of it at the moment with the upgraded 289 4 barrel intake. It is not the k-code motor. i have been debating on rebuilding this motor or just buying a 302 to build up.. I am looking for around 330-340hp. A few people i have talked to said if it was not the k-code 289, to just get rid of it and go with a 302. They have said that i will spend lots of money trying to get the 289 to that amount of power. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!!

The car is actually away for a little bit getting soda blasted to start the body work, it does not need that much. Ill post pictures soon enough! Thank you in advance!
98mustangkidd is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 06:54 AM
  #2  
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
2+2GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 5,232
Default

I don't understand what "they" mean about the 289. The only difference inside or out between the 289 and 302 is the 302 had a 1/8" longer stroke.

Considering you can get upwards of 350 hp from a 289 without even going with exotic modern parts, using OEM iron heads, etc., you might want to consider listening to "them" less.

A guy near here did a budget build of a 67 289 2V:

• Edelbrock Performer RPM intake
• 600 cfm carb
• Stock distributor recurved to BOSS 302 specs
• C9OZ-6250-C hydraulic cam
• Port-matching of the exhaust ports to headers (his first time, done in the garage)

Nothing else. No exotic valve train, no roller cam, no fancy ignition system.

Results? 323.5 hp @ 5300.

Yeah, those 289's, real dogs.


Last edited by 2+2GT; 08-12-2012 at 07:00 AM.
2+2GT is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 12:20 PM
  #3  
Zimbo
 
Zimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 30
Default

Zimbo is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 11:40 PM
  #4  
98mustangkidd
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
98mustangkidd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 147
Default

Could you send me a link to that please? If you can find it easily, if not I'll try to find it myself. But thanks a lot for the quick reply and for the information. My dad and I were thrown around big time on random inputs from bunches of people and were wagering our options.. But I think I will keep the 289 and build it up, seeing what you have said and hopefully the thread too. Thanks again!
98mustangkidd is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 11:44 PM
  #5  
98mustangkidd
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
98mustangkidd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 147
Default

So the block wasn't bored at all either? Because we were planning on .30 over on the block. Like I said, I'd be happy with 330-340hp range.
98mustangkidd is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 11:50 PM
  #6  
TomKat
3rd Gear Member
 
TomKat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ca
Posts: 849
Default

Originally Posted by 2+2GT
I don't understand what "they" mean about the 289. The only difference inside or out between the 289 and 302 is the 302 had a 1/8" longer stroke.

Considering you can get upwards of 350 hp from a 289 without even going with exotic modern parts, using OEM iron heads, etc., you might want to consider listening to "them" less.

A guy near here did a budget build of a 67 289 2V:

• Edelbrock Performer RPM intake
• 600 cfm carb
• Stock distributor recurved to BOSS 302 specs
• C9OZ-6250-C hydraulic cam
• Port-matching of the exhaust ports to headers (his first time, done in the garage)

Nothing else. No exotic valve train, no roller cam, no fancy ignition system.

Results? 323.5 hp @ 5300.

Yeah, those 289's, real dogs.

Need we say anything else?
TomKat is offline  
Old 08-13-2012, 01:23 AM
  #7  
Zimbo
 
Zimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 30
Default

use this if you want. just add a 302 crankshaft and rods..
http://www.airflowresearch.com/artic...le087/A-P1.htm
Should get you 340ish HP to the wheels.. If you're not happy with that just use forged parts and a 75 - 100 shot of NOS should be safe to use whenever. I have a 289 for my mustang I'm working on and thats the build I'm going to use.. Not sure what transmission you're going to use but I reccomend an AOD / Gear vendors.. (if automatic) may aswell do it now rather than after the car is done
Zimbo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NorthAmericanTuning
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
5
11-09-2016 11:45 AM
NorthAmericanTuning
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
3
03-18-2016 11:21 AM
kiwi4100
New Member Area
3
08-18-2015 10:45 AM
kiwi4100
2005-2014 Mustangs
0
08-16-2015 08:39 PM
daytooday
Motor Swap Section
2
08-11-2015 09:22 AM



Quick Reply: 66 mustang project



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM.