Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

motor feedback

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2014, 10:14 PM
  #11  
kenash
2nd Gear Member
 
kenash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 356
Default

Originally Posted by barnett468
yes, good info. you can also sneak in another .5 compression using aluminum heads.
Yep! Ditto brother Barnette468....
My ride (s)....
Attached Thumbnails motor feedback-my-therapy-room.jpg  
kenash is offline  
Old 04-16-2014, 10:24 AM
  #12  
groho
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
groho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,195
Default

thanks for the feedback, measured specs, and put data into the summit compression calculator and come up with a 9.7CR which is right in line with my objectives. This is not changing anything the rotating assembly, cuz its not necessary since this is a recent rebuild by the PO, bearing/rod and bearing/cap clearances check at .012, and cam bearings look nearly unused. I need to use a hipo head gasket to achieve this CR. Unless I can find better the thinnest I can find is .039 using a 351W head gasket from felpro. I'd like to see a .035-037 if possible, can anyone suggest something? The rearend will remain a 3:25 tracloc, but intend to change to a 3:73 if I can locate a gearvendor O/D. It's much cheaper to drop in a G/V than upgrading the entire tranmission assembly to a built AOD or 5-speed.

Last edited by groho; 04-16-2014 at 10:27 AM.
groho is offline  
Old 04-16-2014, 02:36 PM
  #13  
kenash
2nd Gear Member
 
kenash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 356
Default

Originally Posted by groho
thanks for the feedback, measured specs, and put data into the summit compression calculator and come up with a 9.7CR which is right in line with my objectives. This is not changing anything the rotating assembly, cuz its not necessary since this is a recent rebuild by the PO, bearing/rod and bearing/cap clearances check at .012, and cam bearings look nearly unused. I need to use a hipo head gasket to achieve this CR. Unless I can find better the thinnest I can find is .039 using a 351W head gasket from felpro. I'd like to see a .035-037 if possible, can anyone suggest something? The rearend will remain a 3:25 tracloc, but intend to change to a 3:73 if I can locate a gearvendor O/D. It's much cheaper to drop in a G/V than upgrading the entire tranmission assembly to a built AOD or 5-speed.
Hi,
Why would you want to tighten the quench that much? Running iron heads together with a tighter quench is going to increase your detonation factor.
Can I ask what are the numbers you used and how did you determine them in arriving at the 9.7 CR?
kenash is offline  
Old 04-16-2014, 04:37 PM
  #14  
groho
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
groho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,195
Default

I won't be running iron heads, I'll be running AFR165, 58CC. the specs were, 3.5" stroke, 4.030 bore, .047 piston to deck clearance, +8cc valve relief pistons, 58cc heads, .039 heads gasket = 9.71:1 CR
groho is offline  
Old 04-16-2014, 05:33 PM
  #15  
kenash
2nd Gear Member
 
kenash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 356
Default

Originally Posted by groho
I won't be running iron heads, I'll be running AFR165, 58CC. the specs were, 3.5" stroke, 4.030 bore, .047 piston to deck clearance, +8cc valve relief pistons, 58cc heads, .039 heads gasket = 9.71:1 CR
OK, looks like you got the right numbers going on. The reason I thought your were running iron heads was your reference to 351 head gaskets. But, your choice in heads is a good one. I run a similar setup, but, am running a 10.6 CR static. Did you CC the piston reliefs or take what the mfg. stated? The reason I asked, I run Probes and they were not what was listed by them. So, I CC'd all of them. Also know the area between the top of 1st ring and the top of the piston is a couple of CCs. I believe it was 2 CCs in my case. There is a CR calculator that will provide your dynamic CR through the input of the opening and closing events of your cam.
I've since forgotten this, but, there is a minimum "quench" that you will want to maintain. I might have it somewhere in original assembly sheets.
Good Luck....
kenash is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
firehorse02
Archive - Parts For Sale
1
11-16-2015 11:28 AM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
10
10-03-2015 06:23 AM
Explosive
Street/Strip
17
10-02-2015 07:45 AM
logan409
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
10
09-26-2015 07:43 PM



Quick Reply: motor feedback



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 PM.