Question about cam
#21
I have a c4 with stock gears, think 2.73 or close to that. What rpm range they consider "low" when they say the cam should make good low end torque.
Yea before the light total timing was really high but now that it's correct there is no performance difference.
Grind number is fs xe 256h-10
Comp cam part number is 31-234-3.
Thanks
Tim
Yea before the light total timing was really high but now that it's correct there is no performance difference.
Grind number is fs xe 256h-10
Comp cam part number is 31-234-3.
Thanks
Tim
okay hold on...what transmission do you have and what rear end gear are you running?
I would expect that with that amount of duration that a cam like that would not make good power until 3000 rpm
Was your total timing above 50 or 60 before you got a light on it?
if you are running a t5 with 2.75 gears that would be an issue
-Gun
PS do you have the actual grind number for that cam so i can look at the cam card?
I would expect that with that amount of duration that a cam like that would not make good power until 3000 rpm
Was your total timing above 50 or 60 before you got a light on it?
if you are running a t5 with 2.75 gears that would be an issue
-Gun
PS do you have the actual grind number for that cam so i can look at the cam card?
#22
according to the card it should be timed more towards torque than peak Hp. I expected to see a range closer to 2000 to 6500.
It could be a gear combo that is giving issue....what was the grind number on the previous cam?
It could be a gear combo that is giving issue....what was the grind number on the previous cam?
#23
#24
I don't know anything about the old cam. The guy I bought the car from said he thought aprevious owner has done some engines work but not sure what. I could not decipher any numbers on it.
I might need to do rear gears, thinking about 3.25 so the revs aren't too high on the freeway.
Tim
I might need to do rear gears, thinking about 3.25 so the revs aren't too high on the freeway.
Tim
#25
Yeah thats what the card seems to indicate so it should be making good low end performance...or its low end performance should be where it preforms best and thats what the general description claims.
But if we dont know much about the original cam then I suppose that makes comparing the two quite tough.
-Gun
#26
Yeah thats what the card seems to indicate so it should be making good low end performance...or its low end performance should be where it preforms best and thats what the general description claims.
But if we dont know much about the original cam then I suppose that makes comparing the two quite tough.
-Gun
But if we dont know much about the original cam then I suppose that makes comparing the two quite tough.
-Gun
an original cam would have this marking
.
Last edited by barnett468; 01-17-2016 at 08:23 PM.
#27
#28
ok, that is a stock cam, if you want more bottom end and only rev it to 3500, you need the xe250h as i previously mentioned if you keep the same gears.
the duration @ .050" on the stock cam s less than the ex256 cam
the duration @ .050" on the stock cam s less than the ex256 cam
#29
But should the xe256 give me less get up and go than the stock one? I'm trying to figure out if there is a problem with the install or tune or just I'd the cam I installed is a step back. All the research I did said that with stock head and valves the 256 should of improved my performance and that's why I'm confused.
Thanks,
Tim
Thanks,
Tim
#30
But should the xe256 give me less get up and go than the stock one? I'm trying to figure out if there is a problem with the install or tune or just I'd the cam I installed is a step back. All the research I did said that with stock head and valves the 256 should of improved my performance and that's why I'm confused.
Thanks,
Tim
Thanks,
Tim
if you installed it 1 tooth off in the retard direction, it would be a total pig off the line and might have a big flat spot when you hit the gas.