The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-24-2007, 01:48 PM   #21
70fastback
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 16
Default RE: Explorer rear end

Do we have to do anything with the MC or the proportioning valve when going form rear drums to disk?

I have a 70 fastback, I just changed thefront from drums to disk, so I have a new MC & valve. Do I have to use the MC or/and valve from the explorer or is mine sufficient?

This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
70fastback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 04:39 PM   #22
ozarks06
1st Gear Member
 
ozarks06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 122
Default RE: Explorer rear end

I think you probably need an MC for disc/disc and a proportioning valve. Disc brakes take a different amount of fluid than drums (I don't remember if it's more or less). I used an Explorer MC with a Fox power booster. The reason I used the Explorer MC is that the lines come out on the left (driver's side) to clear the valve cover onthe 4.6 engine(about 1/4" clearance). I think I remember reading that some guys use a 2000 V6 Mustang MC (search on VMF or contact Mustang Steve www.mustangsteve.com. He has all kinds of parts and knowledge about this stuff.). I don't know if your proportioning valve will work. I bought a Speedway adjustable valve (same as Wilwood for about 2/3 the cost - about $35).
__________________
Plain Jane 65 Mustang
ozarks06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 05:08 PM   #23
Decurion
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Vehicle: 65 Mercury Comet
Location: The unemployment epicenter, Detroit, MI
Posts: 430
Send a message via AIM to Decurion
Default RE: Explorer rear end

The explorer rear end is great because it has 31 spline axles and heavy duty disk brakes, but the drawbacks (besides the fact that it wont fit in my Falcon) are the already mentioned pinion flange, and the fact that its HEAVY! I can lift an average 9" by myself, but the explorer 8.8 is heavier. I never weighed the one I had, but it was really heavy. Probably a little better suited to a fullsize car, or stationwagon, especially if you plan to do a lot of towing.
__________________
-Eric
65 Comet wagon
Decurion is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
68, 88, diff, end, explorer, ford, gear, mustang, offset, pinion, py, ratio, rear, swap, widths, yoke

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company