The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-01-2008, 10:34 AM   #11
Starfury
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 4,482
Default

Or I just don't like Flowmaster 40-series:P

PS: I sent you a PM, Jon
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
Tad H.
'67 Fastback
331 stroker
Starfury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 12:45 PM   #12
younginwith66
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Vehicle: 1966 Mustang Coupe
Location: OC, California
Posts: 73
Default

well, i ended up getting flowtech afterburners. they are 3 chambered, VS 2 chambered with the super 40's

i can still return them though...im just wondering if i should, or do you think it would be best?
__________________

don't you just love them classics
younginwith66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 01:07 PM   #13
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: 67 Mustang Coupe
Location: California
Posts: 7,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonward786 View Post
Not everyone is looking to make 400 hp, so take your flowmasters suck speech elsewhere. they sound good, if you dont agree with that, you might be deaf
So why exactly did you cut off the first half of that sentence? You know, that part where I said "As far as flow and performance...." I never said they sounded bad, just that they performed badly.
__________________
Who cares how much horsepower it has, all that matters is how fast it goes!

13.20's with 2.25-2.30 60's, 40+ year old suspension sucks!
Best trap 107.11mph, we'll see what the new intake/carb setup does.
12.80 at 110.5mph NHRA DA corrected
67mustang302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 10:47 PM   #14
fast65
5th Gear Member
1984 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
fast65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 1965 Mustang GT, 1984 Mustang SVO
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,083
Send a message via AIM to fast65 Send a message via Yahoo to fast65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67mustang302 View Post
So why exactly did you cut off the first half of that sentence? You know, that part where I said "As far as flow and performance...." I never said they sounded bad, just that they performed badly.
It must have been easier to make a more compelling argument that way.
__________________


'65 Mustang GT-stroker 347 w/Toploader 4-speed
'84 SVO-2.3T at 17 psi
fast65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 11:20 PM   #15
BA Mustang
ROTM Moderator
1967 Ford Mustang
 
BA Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 1967 Mustang Coupe
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 5,036
Send a message via AIM to BA Mustang Send a message via Yahoo to BA Mustang
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by younginwith66 View Post
well, i ended up getting flowtech afterburners. they are 3 chambered, VS 2 chambered with the super 40's

i can still return them though...im just wondering if i should, or do you think it would be best?
Can you get a video of it. I would like to hear it.
__________________
ROTM November!

Own a red mustang join this group: Red
Own an I6 mustang join this group: I6
BA Mustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 11:39 PM   #16
fast65
5th Gear Member
1984 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
fast65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 1965 Mustang GT, 1984 Mustang SVO
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,083
Send a message via AIM to fast65 Send a message via Yahoo to fast65
Default



That's probably pretty close to what they would sound like, not too bad I guess.
__________________


'65 Mustang GT-stroker 347 w/Toploader 4-speed
'84 SVO-2.3T at 17 psi
fast65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 06:08 AM   #17
mykie
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2
Smile

That youtube clip is on my car, my clip also by the way.
I think the Afterburner sounds great "loud", a little resonans on low rpm.

//Mykie
__________________
Mykie //
Mustang HT-70 302-4V
mykie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 03:54 PM   #18
FasterCat
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 57
Default

YouTube is a great place to shop for mufflers.

Just search for the exhausts you are considering with a similar motor + exhaust setup,
you'll probably find lots of good examples.
( pay close attention to where the recorder is "standing" to get true apples/apples comparisons )


If my wife wasn't going to be driving the car, I was going to go for the Flowmaster 44s.
... But then, in my searches I found Spintech (talk about flow ! )


Spintech's "pro-street" flows WAY more that the Flowmaster 44s, and it is their Quiet Muffler !
(I like the sound & flow .... that's what I'll be putting on my 400 HP Cat)

http://www.spintechmufflers.com/spin...ntechindex.asp
FasterCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 04:16 PM   #19
1jsmith
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 15
Default Dynomax vs Flowmaster

I currently have Dynomax and wish I still had my Flowmasters.
1jsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 05:43 PM   #20
Joe67
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Vehicle: 1967 convertible(power top) Aqua Interior
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,052
Send a message via AIM to Joe67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by r7jbodyshop View Post
I just got my motor rebuilt and was wandering about the 40s or 44s. I want to be able to drive and here the mean sound of the exhaust, but I also want to be able to listen to a little music with my wife. Also I want to be able to turn some heads when I drive by. Any advice would be great thanks.
i have seen set up where the exhaust was run to a quiet muffler but had a exhaust bypass valve to a glasspack, this was on a truck with lots more room, but i think you could fit a valve and another muffler in the tunnel of a stang, i found the valve online once and cant find it now, found one like it though



there are also cable actuated, i will try to find them and post them on here
Joe67 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1984, afterburner, camaro, flowtech, muffler, video

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company