New Features: Ford Mustang Knowledge Base
The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-16-2009, 10:59 AM   #11
Randys66gt
2nd Gear Member
 
Randys66gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Vehicle: 1966 Ford Mustang GT Coupe
Location: California
Posts: 205
Default

1969 had the highest HP of 290. If you run the 84, it has a 28 oz balancer which means you can use your flywheel. Summit sells #88650 Hedman for $153.95. Didn't see it in MU. I haven't seen the higher mounts but I'm interested too. You can use the same starter and it depends on the header for the mini. I had the regular starter for a while and clearance was great with the shortys.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
66"GT coupe
351W
T-5 Trans
3.89 9"
Ground up and just needs paint and the easy stuff.
Randys66gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 10:36 PM   #12
66 tang
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 1966, Ford, Mustang coupe
Location: Alaska
Posts: 14
Default

http://www.mustangsunlimited.com/key...ords=351w+swap here is the link for the mustang swap headers, if clearance is good with the stock starter and shorty headers than i just might go that route to save a little $$.

now how much clearance do you have between your shock towers and headers? and are you using stock 302/289 engine mounts?

and can i reuse the timing chain cover, water pump, crank pullys and harmonic balancer on a 1969 351w from my 302?
66 tang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 11:29 PM   #13
Randys66gt
2nd Gear Member
 
Randys66gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Vehicle: 1966 Ford Mustang GT Coupe
Location: California
Posts: 205
Default

Nothing against MU cuz I love that place and they like me for the money I've spent, but those are the Hedman headers I got from Summit. Save 30 bucks. I bought new stock mounts and they worked perfect. I also used the 289 (new) front cover, water pump, pulleys but got a SFI balancer. The clearance between our towers is about 3/4" on each side. Look at the picture, number 7 goes up and back and that is what makes the bolts dificult. The 67-68 have more clearance than we do because their car is wider.
__________________
66"GT coupe
351W
T-5 Trans
3.89 9"
Ground up and just needs paint and the easy stuff.
Randys66gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 03:19 AM   #14
66 tang
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 1966, Ford, Mustang coupe
Location: Alaska
Posts: 14
Default

ok, i was thinking about beating the shock towers in a little to gain some clearance, and another thing i was thinking about doing was buying longer engine mount bolts and shimming the engine upwards with grade 8 washers to gain a little more clearance, same concept as the "raised engine mounts" and of course using a very small air cleaner.

what is an sfi balancer? and what are the advantages of using a sfi balancer?

and is there any differences in power between shorty and full length headers? or is that a dumb question
66 tang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 12:21 PM   #15
Randys66gt
2nd Gear Member
 
Randys66gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Vehicle: 1966 Ford Mustang GT Coupe
Location: California
Posts: 205
Default

If you have a metal yard around, get some steel tubing and cut it to spec. Use a thick wall tubing too. Good idea, I might try that. My balancer was shot, rubber coming out so the different between them, I went SFI. SFI balancers are guaranteed NOT to come apart at 6K and above. No real advantage except they do have both 3 and 4 bolts. The long tubes produce more horsepower. I used short because its going lower!
__________________
66"GT coupe
351W
T-5 Trans
3.89 9"
Ground up and just needs paint and the easy stuff.
Randys66gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 08:49 PM   #16
Randys66gt
2nd Gear Member
 
Randys66gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Vehicle: 1966 Ford Mustang GT Coupe
Location: California
Posts: 205
Default

You know, I have really been thinking about what you said about the mounts. If you go too high, that WILL change the angle of the trans WHICH in turn changes the u-joint angles! Not good if it's too much. Raising the engine 1/2" and the trans 1/2" should be ok. There really isn't room in the tunnel to go much more.
__________________
66"GT coupe
351W
T-5 Trans
3.89 9"
Ground up and just needs paint and the easy stuff.
Randys66gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 10:21 PM   #17
66 tang
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 1966, Ford, Mustang coupe
Location: Alaska
Posts: 14
Default

well thanks for the advice randy, i really appreciated it, as of now im waiting for my new gas tank and heater junction box, and for my next pay check haha, i figure two more pay checks will cover my build up expenses for now.

oh, i was wandering, my donor 351w has a stock harmonic balancer off of an 1989 351w and it appears to be in good shape, is there any reason i couldnt reuse it on a 1969 351w?
66 tang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 11:02 PM   #18
Randys66gt
2nd Gear Member
 
Randys66gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Vehicle: 1966 Ford Mustang GT Coupe
Location: California
Posts: 205
Default

Look at the back of each balancers and MAKE SURE the balance weight is the same size. I don't remember what the 89 is. If they appear to be the same, no problems. The 50 in oz is almost double the size. Need anything else, let me know.
__________________
66"GT coupe
351W
T-5 Trans
3.89 9"
Ground up and just needs paint and the easy stuff.
Randys66gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 10:20 PM   #19
66 tang
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 1966, Ford, Mustang coupe
Location: Alaska
Posts: 14
Default

ok, update, motor came in today, i had motor works in seattle build it, it is a 69 351w. they put a cam and springs in it and its supposed to be putting out 300 horse power, so im pretty excited about that.

im curious, can i reuse the flywheel that is on the 302 that was in the car?
66 tang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 10:48 PM   #20
rmodel65
2nd Amendment Gear Member
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Vehicle: 1965, ford, mustang fastback
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 9,318
Send a message via AIM to rmodel65 Send a message via MSN to rmodel65 Send a message via Yahoo to rmodel65
Default

if the the 302 is from 1981 or earlier
__________________



“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”
~Samuel Adams
rmodel65 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1966, 1967, 351, 351w, 66, alternator, bracket, conversion, coupe, engine, morris, mustang, puting, ron, swap

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company