The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-19-2009, 09:07 AM   #11
urban_cowboy
4th Gear Member
1969 Ford Mustang
 
urban_cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: '69 Mustang Mach1
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,691
Default

+1 on the 9". If you are swapping out the rearend, get a good one. The 9" has more pinion teeth in contact with the ring gear than other rearends, the parts are very available, they are easier to setup IMO, and they are period correct for your car.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________

"Yeah, were runnin a little bit hot tonight. I can barely see the road from the heat comin' off of it." Van Halen
urban_cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 12:34 PM   #12
Starfury
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 4,467
Default

But they're heavy and expensive:P
__________________
Tad H.
'67 Fastback
331 stroker
Starfury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 10:14 PM   #13
countryboy116
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 202
Default

while the 9" may be a little stronger, you can find 8.8s out of fox bodies all over the place and theyre easy to make work and alot cheaper to get one usually than a 9", imo id just look for a 8.8 out of a fox and convert it to 5 lug
countryboy116 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 10:20 PM   #14
92ponyranger
 
92ponyranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Vehicle: 92 Ford Ranger 5.0
Location: Texas, duh!?
Posts: 43
Default

http://dazed.home.bresnan.net/JaguarIRS1.html
__________________
92ponyranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 12:28 AM   #15
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 5,537
Default

A 9 inch will take more power then any 8.8 and laugh about it.If you get a alum 3rd member it cuts some weight off it.The best thing is a lot of drag racers and off road types use a 9 inch so good used gear sets are cheap.Only rear end id use over a 9 inch is a dana 60.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 02:08 AM   #16
mustangracer91
 
mustangracer91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Vehicle: 1968 Ford Mustang
Location: Oklahoma, denial
Posts: 5
Default

just my 2cents, but the 8.8 if you can weld/have someone do it, 9inch if you don't...depends on what motor you're running too. If you're a Honduh racer and do crazy clutch dumps from every stop light, I'd say the 9 is cheap insurance...or if you're running a 400 hp+ small block or a big block...I've RACED 8.8's with 400hp + nitrous on 150k+ mile stock rear 8.8's and never blew one despite me actually trying to (so I'd have an excuse to change my gears). 8.8's aren't bullet proof, but they're pretty good. Also, your t-bird rears pre '89 will work, however they are WIDER, but most of them do come with rear disks as well...just 4lug, so you'd have to swap rotors...simple axle swap and you're done if you want 5lug...
__________________

"coming home smelling like transmission fluid is bad,
but not like crack and hookers bad." -Jay Leno
All Mine: 1968 Ford Mustang project, 1997 Ford Taurus SHO, 1987 Merkur XR4Ti
mustangracer91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 02:16 AM   #17
Starfury
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 4,467
Default

Andrew, more power capacity isn't always what everyone needs I'm going with an 8.8 because it's lighter than a 9" but will handle all the power I'll ever throw at it. I'm building a small block road racer, so something light but strong will suit me well. Mustangs are tail-happy enough as-is, I don't need more weight back there.
__________________
Tad H.
'67 Fastback
331 stroker
Starfury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 06:59 AM   #18
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 5,537
Default

After i snapped a 8.8 in a ranger with a small block and slicks i'd never use one again.The truck still drag races tell this day but with a 9 inch in it.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 10:55 AM   #19
68dustin
1st Gear Member
1971 Oldsmobile Cutlass
My Garage
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: 68 stang,67coug,70cutty
Location: cali
Posts: 77
Default

well my buddy is just going to give me a mustang 8.8 rear end with 3.55 gears with the stock posi unit.. I figure if i have it i might as well try to make it work. I think Im going to just set it aside for a while until i figure out what i want to do. In a few months when the time comes i will look around for a 9" but if i cant find one for a decent price the 8.8 it is... so how much wider is the 8.8 mustang rear end compare to the 68 mustang 8"?
68dustin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 12:42 PM   #20
Starfury
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 4,467
Default

Less than 1/4" It really is the perfect width for the car.

For axles, you need to go to a junkyard and find two 83-92 Rangers or Bronco II's with a 4cyl or 3.0, or a couple 86-97 Aerostars, or any combination as long as you have two vehicles. You need the driver side axle from a Ranger/Bronco II, or the passenger side axle from an Aerostar. Grab the brakes from these vehicles as well. You'll likely need to rebuild them, but scavenge what you can.
__________________
Tad H.
'67 Fastback
331 stroker
Starfury is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1968, 67, 88, axle, body, brakes, conversion, dimensions, disc, early, explorer, fox, irs, lincoln, mk, mustang, rear, swap, width

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company