The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-22-2009, 08:48 PM   #11
stangtjk
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: 1968 coupe
Location: WV
Posts: 392
Default

Quote:
You added quite a bit of weight between the hood and the underbody reinforcements. I'd guess at maybe 500lbs. That motor will haul it around just fine, it's just going to be a bit of a pig.
You are way overestimating that. I used approximately 2 4x8 sheets of 16ga (~160lbs) and 48ft of 2x3x1/8 tubing (~185lbs), so a total of 345lbs. Now subtract the weight of the the original floor and frame from front to back and I'd bet that I didn't add much more than 100lbs. And with 290 HP from the stock 4.6 vs 190 HP from the stock 289 I don't think the car will be that much of a pig.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
stangtjk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2009, 08:52 PM   #12
stangtjk
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: 1968 coupe
Location: WV
Posts: 392
Default

Quote:
One other concern, though...is that tank galvanized? If not, you could run into some nasty corrosion issues.
I'm going to coat the inside of the tank with a tank sealer from KBS or POR-15 so that wont be a problem.

Quote:
Also, are you going to make that hood scoop functional? Would be kinda nifty.
The hood scoop will be functional. Most of the stock hood under neath of it will be cut away.
stangtjk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2009, 09:26 PM   #13
Nick.Simonds
4th Gear Member
 
Nick.Simonds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Vehicle: 65 Coupe
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,226
Default

Wow man, those are some nice fab skills. It will be interesting the see the hood all finished and painted up.
__________________
Nick.Simonds is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2009, 09:44 PM   #14
Deviousfred
2nd Gear Member
1965 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
Deviousfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Vehicle: 65 Mustang Coupe
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 407
Default

Great progress! You got a whole lot more done during your spring break than I did during mine! So you're going with IRS?
__________________
Fred

65 Mustang Coupe
Blah Blah Blah
Charlene
Deviousfred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2009, 09:48 PM   #15
Tony R
4th Gear Member
 
Tony R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 65 mustang 91 exploder 94 F150
Location: Vancouver Wa
Posts: 1,071
Default

cool hood. Be a head turner for sure.
Tony R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2009, 10:08 PM   #16
stangtjk
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: 1968 coupe
Location: WV
Posts: 392
Default

Quote:
Wow man, those are some nice fab skills. It will be interesting the see the hood all finished and painted up.
Thanks, I wont get a chance to work on it again until May but hopefully I'll have the car mostly finished this summer, at least to the point that I can drive it.

Quote:
You got a whole lot more done during your spring break than I did during mine! So you're going with IRS?
I put in a lot of hours over the past week. Yeah I'm using the IRS from the Mark viii. I had it bolted up already but I tore the car back down to finish up the frame. The good thing about how I built the car is I can have the drive train and suspension dropped out from under it in less than an hour.
stangtjk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009, 12:10 AM   #17
Starfury
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 4,469
Default

Oh...so you removed the stock floor pan entirely? Hm.
__________________
Tad H.
'67 Fastback
331 stroker
Starfury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009, 07:58 AM   #18
67 evil eleanor
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,818
Default

Nice job. You will love the Mod engine. The height will come in handy if you add a Supercharger later. Not sure about the "PIG" comment, I think you will see mileage in the mid to high 20's. "Tit for Tat" I think the weight is going to almost wash out and you will be more like 50 lbs or so within the stock weight (or even closer). This can easily be canceled out by removing like most of the undercoat-seam sealer, stock sound deadener, changing the seats, aluminum rims and so on. Given the increase in power over a 289, well thats not hard to figure out.
__________________
[IMG][/IMG] Eat Rice and be Healthy!!!
67 evil eleanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009, 01:28 PM   #19
Starfury
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 4,469
Default

Well, I was under the impression that he left the stock floorpans in, and the sheet metal was for bracing. My concern now is that the floor doesn't have enough structural rigidity, being a flat piece rather than a contoured and ribbed piece.
__________________
Tad H.
'67 Fastback
331 stroker
Starfury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009, 04:45 PM   #20
stangtjk
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: 1968 coupe
Location: WV
Posts: 392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starfury View Post
Well, I was under the impression that he left the stock floorpans in, and the sheet metal was for bracing. My concern now is that the floor doesn't have enough structural rigidity, being a flat piece rather than a contoured and ribbed piece.
LOL I have four frame rails going through the middle of the car. There are 2 2x3 tubes running through the center and another 2 tucked inside the rocker panels. I don't think there will be a problem with the rigidity on this chassis.

stangtjk is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
2007, 65, auto, classic, custom, customize, efi, fuel, hood, hoods, mustang, mustangs, scoops, steel, tanks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company