The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-10-2009, 04:28 PM   #41
cprstreetmachines
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,035
Default

So this showed up today. Stout piece of AL tell you what. It's lighter overall than the nodular case. The 40 spline axle will be lighter than the 35 spline also because of the gun drilling. Overall I think I'll only have an extra 600 in the rear end going this way. Cheaper than deciding to do it later for sure.Way overkill. BUt you all know how it goes. It'll be 25.5 in no time, but I won't have to upgrade this. lol ! I called one guy about some strange stuff, never called me back. Wonder if he'll be sorry with all the strange parts going on this car. Still have axles, housing, back brace, and probably brakes in the rear. Dunno about those thin little things in the back. We'll have to see.





This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
turbocharged 1967 349 stroker
1/8 mile 6.966 @ 99.704 Rich
1/8 mile 6.47@107.6 Dustin 1.43 best 60ft
cprstreetmachines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2009, 05:54 PM   #42
urban_cowboy
4th Gear Member
1969 Ford Mustang
 
urban_cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: '69 Mustang Mach1
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cprstreetmachines View Post
The "smaller" tire is a 325/50/15 and the larger slick is 29.5x13.5. You can run a 315 without a mini tub. You'll run into the leafs first anyways. Rims for both are 15x12's. As soon as I cut up the car a bit I'm going to measure for the next set of rear rims. Will be the same size, but probably with another inch of backspace or so I'm guessing.
Wow, so you can run 26x12" without rubbing? What backspace are you running on the 15X12 wheels? I have 26X10 MT on 15x8s but I am not sure I could get another two inches in width without rubbing when the suspension flexed.
__________________

"Yeah, were runnin a little bit hot tonight. I can barely see the road from the heat comin' off of it." Van Halen
urban_cowboy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2009, 06:39 PM   #43
cprstreetmachines
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,035
Default

Noooo, nono. I could get it to fit with a mini tub, and the rear suspension I'm making. It'll have tubular lower, and I could offset them if I needed.But probably wouldn't need it. The lowers are going to be much skinnier than leafs. I had a 28x10.5 on the old car. but either car can run a 315 without a mini tub.(urs or mine)
__________________
turbocharged 1967 349 stroker
1/8 mile 6.966 @ 99.704 Rich
1/8 mile 6.47@107.6 Dustin 1.43 best 60ft

Last edited by cprstreetmachines; 08-10-2009 at 07:55 PM. Reason: Whorable spelin
cprstreetmachines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 01:22 AM   #44
boogerschnot
4th Gear Member
1969 Ford Mustang
 
boogerschnot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 69 Grande' Coupe
Location: Originally Iota, Louisiana in San Diego now..
Posts: 1,926
Default

Wow.. Thats pretty. I need one too man.. Ill be over later in the week to pick it up..
__________________
69 Mustang Grande'
351W Holley 670
Edlebrock Performer Cam/Intake
Hooker Competition Headers
Dual Flowmaster 2.5" 40's with a H Pipe
FMX Auto / 9 Inch Rear w/2.75 Gears

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2665602
boogerschnot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 09:24 AM   #45
urban_cowboy
4th Gear Member
1969 Ford Mustang
 
urban_cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: '69 Mustang Mach1
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cprstreetmachines View Post
Noooo, nono. I could get it to fit with a mini tub, and the rear suspension I'm making. It'll have tubular lower, and I could offset them if I needed.But probably wouldn't need it. The lowers are going to be much skinnier than leafs. I had a 28x10.5 on the old car. but either car can run a 315 without a mini tub.(urs or mine)
315 50 R15? That is a 27.40"x12.40" tire. That seams pretty wide and tall without needing a minitub. I am curious because I will not minitub my car, but would love a larger footprint to help plant power.
__________________

"Yeah, were runnin a little bit hot tonight. I can barely see the road from the heat comin' off of it." Van Halen
urban_cowboy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 11:04 AM   #46
cprstreetmachines
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,035
Default

Well I tried to look for ya. Rich has 315/35/17's on his 67 no tub. People didn't believe him so he started a thread a few years back and took pics because he was being asked if he was sure they were 315's. lol The 69 we have here has the same on 18's. The section width was just a little bigger on the different brand 315 for the 69 (probably only 1/8 difference, but counts when going this big). We probably could have just the inner with a hammer also. But with the extra body roll we expect with this car, we didn't want it rubbing while 10k miles away.
__________________
turbocharged 1967 349 stroker
1/8 mile 6.966 @ 99.704 Rich
1/8 mile 6.47@107.6 Dustin 1.43 best 60ft
cprstreetmachines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 11:49 AM   #47
urban_cowboy
4th Gear Member
1969 Ford Mustang
 
urban_cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: '69 Mustang Mach1
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,694
Default

Ok, 315 35 R17 are 25.7" tall and 12.40" wide. That is a little more believable with the right back spacing.
__________________

"Yeah, were runnin a little bit hot tonight. I can barely see the road from the heat comin' off of it." Van Halen
urban_cowboy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 02:06 PM   #48
boogerschnot
4th Gear Member
1969 Ford Mustang
 
boogerschnot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 69 Grande' Coupe
Location: Originally Iota, Louisiana in San Diego now..
Posts: 1,926
Default

I like how you just ripped all of the suspension out and threw it outside. It makes a nice lawn ornament..
__________________
69 Mustang Grande'
351W Holley 670
Edlebrock Performer Cam/Intake
Hooker Competition Headers
Dual Flowmaster 2.5" 40's with a H Pipe
FMX Auto / 9 Inch Rear w/2.75 Gears

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2665602
boogerschnot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 02:28 PM   #49
cprstreetmachines
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by urban_cowboy View Post
Ok, 315 35 R17 are 25.7" tall and 12.40" wide. That is a little more believable with the right back spacing.
Yeah, still both 12.4 wide ? Would imagine both would fit then. You can fit 29.5 in the rear. At least it's a little more believable.

Justin. We usually put the scrap out and people are asking for it before we finish the job. This one took a good 1.5 days before someone asked for it. He was surprised also when I told him how long it had been out there.
__________________
turbocharged 1967 349 stroker
1/8 mile 6.966 @ 99.704 Rich
1/8 mile 6.47@107.6 Dustin 1.43 best 60ft
cprstreetmachines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 09:52 PM   #50
cprstreetmachines
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,035
Default

These are awesome. Instead of just holes for the rear of the control arms to bolt to, I can make smaller adjustments than just .750 or 1in. Loosen, slide 'em up or down a bit. Guess it's a very old NASCAR and circle trick. Some of the circle guys use just sliders. but I wanted these so I knew how much they were moved, and that they were evenly moved.




Ends for the lower control arms. Enough for the arms and the panhard. Same for the toothed pads.
__________________
turbocharged 1967 349 stroker
1/8 mile 6.966 @ 99.704 Rich
1/8 mile 6.47@107.6 Dustin 1.43 best 60ft
cprstreetmachines is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
50, 67, 6th, classics, classifieds, coupe, crooked, engine, ford, heap, motor, mustang, sale, slant8, transmission, ugly

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company