The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-17-2009, 11:21 AM   #1
rdambros
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9
Default What Octane Gas for '66 Mustang

I have a 1966 Mustang coupe, 2 barrel 289, and was wondering if there would be any benefit in using the higher, and more costly, octane gas. Currently, I am putting the highest grade gas into the car, mostly because I think that it will keep the valves and cylinders cleaner. But, recently I began to think that these higher octane gas didn't exist in 1966 and maybe I might be doing more HARM then GOOD.

What is the opinion of the experts here on the forum. Thanks.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
1966 Mustang Coupe
rdambros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 11:46 AM   #2
TexasAxMan
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 1966 Mustang Coupe
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,094
Default

You're not doing any harm, you may or may not be doing any good. Use the lowest grade of gasoline that does NOT cause your engine to ping, or pre-detonate.

If under moderate to high load there is no pinging, you're all good.

BTW, octane ratings were different when these cars were new, I'm not sure if there is a direct correlation. Also, lead was added in the old days.
__________________
1966 Mustang Coupe
302 w/ T-5
TexasAxMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 11:53 AM   #3
blue66mustang
2nd Gear Member
 
blue66mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 1966 Coupe
Location: Illinois
Posts: 310
Default

The rating today is much different today versus then.
The 1966 owner’s manual states that a 2V 289 requires 94 minimum octane back then. The 4V and HIPO required 100 or better.
Like Axeman says use what works best in your car.

BTW higher octane doesn’t necessarily mean the "best" gas. Depends on the additives the maker adds when refining.
__________________
FORD..Free Of Republicans and Democrats.

Nightmist Blue 1966 Coupe.
289 A code. Holley 600. Edelbrock dual-plane Intake. TRI-Y headers & Glass packs. C-4 B&M Shift Kit, Kevlar Bands. Billet Servo. PowerTraX Auto Locker. 1 1/8" front 1" rear ADCO sway bars. KYB Gas-Adjust Shocks. Export brace and M/C bar. CSRP KH Disc Brake Conversion. Torq Thrust D's w/ B.F.G TA Radials.
blue66mustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2009, 12:47 PM   #4
2+2GT
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Vehicle: 66 Mustang 2+2GT
Location: PA
Posts: 1,575
Default

Your 2V should run perfectly on pump regular. My 289HP is just fine on pump premium, and I could probably get away with less in needed.
2+2GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 07:59 AM   #5
rdambros
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 9
Default

Okay thanks. So, then what manufacturer and grade does everyone use?

I live in Canada, so I have to choose from Shell, Esso, Sunoco, Petro Canada, etc...

Recently, Shell started advertising Nitrogen enriched gasoline. Does anyone believe this would be a benefit to this old engine?

Thanks.
__________________
1966 Mustang Coupe
rdambros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 12:13 PM   #6
xswoopr
1st Gear Member
1966 Ford Mustang
 
xswoopr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 1966 Fastback GT
Location: Kitchener Ontario Canada
Posts: 76
Default

Don't know about the nitrogen enriched gas, but a friend of mine who drag races once dyno tested different makes of pump gas in his 1000hp car, He found that Pioneer was giving him the best and most consistent response, but all the others were close behind. Unless hundredths of a second matter to you, it doesn't really matter which brand.
xswoopr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 12:24 PM   #7
2+2GT
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Vehicle: 66 Mustang 2+2GT
Location: PA
Posts: 1,575
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdambros View Post
Recently, Shell started advertising Nitrogen enriched gasoline. Does anyone believe this would be a benefit to this old engine?
Now that's funny. Nitrogen is an inert gas. 78% of what you're breathing in right now is nitrogen.
2+2GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 12:37 PM   #8
Carlos Pineiro
3rd Gear Member
 
Carlos Pineiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Vehicle: 1969 Mustang Grande (modified) Winter Blue Metallic
Location: Santa Monica, Calif.
Posts: 901
Default

The correct answer:

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasAxMan View Post
...Use the lowest grade of gasoline that does NOT cause your engine to ping, or pre-detonate.
I run 87 in my 302 and it's really smooth. Gasoline is different from state to state with some states like CA requiring "cleaning" additives. Some discount gas vendors like Pioneer and Arco might not offer the same quality as the big boys like Exxon and Unocal. There's no one answer for all cars.

CP
__________________
.
Daily Drivers Rock.
Carlos Pineiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 01:36 PM   #9
HGC
4th Gear Member
 
HGC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Vehicle: 1965 Coupe
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,659
Default

My 65 289 2 barrel runs best on Shell Premium. Without ethanol when I can find it, which is basically never these days.
__________________
HGC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 01:48 PM   #10
jay67fast
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Vehicle: 1967 Mustang Fastback
Location: Florida
Posts: 36
Default

I've had 4 Vintage Mustangs over the years, 2- 200 C.I.6 cylinder cars, and 2- 289 V8 (1 2bbl, 1 4bbl). All of them ran just fine using regular unleaded gas. Never had any problems using regular.
Hope thet helps.
Jay
jay67fast is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1966, 289, 66, fuel, gas, gasoline, grade, hipo, mustang, nitrogen, octane, proper, requirements, shell, v8

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company