The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-24-2009, 09:12 AM   #11
urban_cowboy
4th Gear Member
1969 Ford Mustang
 
urban_cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: '69 Mustang Mach1
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,696
Default

Those accelerometer things use vehicle weight and forces to calculate horsepower. I see you put 2600lbs as your vehicle weight. Have you weighed the car with you in it as tested? That seams light. If you do not put enough weight for the car, your horsepower estimate will be off (low). The mileage times should be accurate though.

Look at my post in the general section about the G-Tech vs the iPhone Dynolicious. The iPhone was MUCH more accurate.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________

"Yeah, were runnin a little bit hot tonight. I can barely see the road from the heat comin' off of it." Van Halen
urban_cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 09:31 AM   #12
kalli
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 1964, Ford, Mustang
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 4,097
Default

not too concerned about the HP readings from G-Tech, and yes, 2600 is probably too light. As you say the times 0-60 and 1/8 should be about correct. even if it's half second off, it shows me the ballpark.
I heard about the iPhone application before and have seen that video with the Mini. have to fgind some1 with an iphone :-)
__________________
1964 1/2
302ci, Edelbrock RPM heads and cam, 650 speed demon, Long Tube headers and Flowmaster 40s
Quick Performance Racing 9" rear, Moser axles, 3.5:1 trac-loc from FRPP and T5 transmission.
CSRP disc brakes front and FRPP discs back.
http://www.gascc.ie


Last edited by kalli; 08-24-2009 at 09:35 AM.
kalli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 10:09 AM   #13
kalli
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 1964, Ford, Mustang
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 4,097
Default

here's exactly what I'm concerned about:
http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keat...e-app-ever.asp

2500lbs carwith this data:
1/8 mile 11.7@76mph
1/4 mile 16.73@100.9mph
result: 220HP

i just have to stop trusting those calculators. with his ET he should be at 100HP and his MPH on 1/4mile tends to show 200HP ... that's huge difference
__________________
1964 1/2
302ci, Edelbrock RPM heads and cam, 650 speed demon, Long Tube headers and Flowmaster 40s
Quick Performance Racing 9" rear, Moser axles, 3.5:1 trac-loc from FRPP and T5 transmission.
CSRP disc brakes front and FRPP discs back.
http://www.gascc.ie

kalli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 12:48 PM   #14
kalli
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 1964, Ford, Mustang
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 4,097
Default

Results:

with 14 degrees initial I measured the following total (without vacuum at crank)
1000-14
1900-14
2000-22
2500-27
3000-32
3500-34
4000-38
4200-39

this gives me the following distributor curve compared with 2+2GTs version (based on the fact that crank=2xcam):

rpm | 2+2GT | my car
350 | 0-1.5 | 0
500 | 0-1.5 | 0
750 | 0-1.75 | 0
1000 | 2.5-4.75 | 4
1500 | 7.75-10 | 9
2000 | 8.5-11 | 12
2100 | 11 | 13

rest unknown as I couldn't rev higher

unfortunately I couldn't rev higher as I felt sorry for my neighbours already. The curve looks good, but I have to disconnect vac advance. I think it's way to agressive. 16 degrees added by vac advance at idle :-(

what I still need to test is what happens if I rev higher than 4200. does it stop advancing? if not, this will be my problem with lack of power up top (too far advanced). i can't find those bloody stoppers that came with distributor anymore ... *cry*

Kalli
__________________
1964 1/2
302ci, Edelbrock RPM heads and cam, 650 speed demon, Long Tube headers and Flowmaster 40s
Quick Performance Racing 9" rear, Moser axles, 3.5:1 trac-loc from FRPP and T5 transmission.
CSRP disc brakes front and FRPP discs back.
http://www.gascc.ie


Last edited by kalli; 08-24-2009 at 12:51 PM.
kalli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 01:20 PM   #15
scootchu
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1966 Ford Mustang Coupe
Location: NJ
Posts: 195
Default

I feel like I am in the same boat as you with forever tuning and chasing my tail. It's an Edlebrock carb? I just switched rods in mine to richen it up at cruise mode, where I heard the pinging under light throttle.
If it's the Holley, then I have no idea, because I had that pinging when I just touched the throttle.

My initial is 12 degrees and total is 36. I welded the 15L slot on my plate to what was supposed to match the 10L, but I think its a bit bigger, hence the 36.

I just dialed my vacuum all the way out. I also went back to Ported, since using manifold it wanted to hold the vacuum to the dist and stay advanced. I am going to pick my daughter up in a few minutes. I will report back.

I read a thread in here where someone said "don't dial out your timing, richen up your AFR"
__________________

1966 Coupe with a 302
scootchu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 02:31 PM   #16
kalli
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 1964, Ford, Mustang
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 4,097
Default

i'm back to the holley 570 street avenger. and yes that pinging i hear is just under very light6 throttle, especially uphill. i disabled vacuum advance now as I can't adjust it. see how that goes. and I'm missing tohose 15L etc thingies to actually have a max centrifugal.
i believe I have to fix that first.
with the edelbrocjk the A/F was good in cruise (13.5:1) from stock, but on WOT it was pig rich (near 10:1), i took smaller secondary jet and a rod with a bigger small diameter and that helped a lot. i brought it up to 13:1, but then I swapped carbs.
I have to make sure my ignition is bang on, before I want to tackle the carb again. otherwise I'll never get it right ... i'll go again to search for the parts for distributor
__________________
1964 1/2
302ci, Edelbrock RPM heads and cam, 650 speed demon, Long Tube headers and Flowmaster 40s
Quick Performance Racing 9" rear, Moser axles, 3.5:1 trac-loc from FRPP and T5 transmission.
CSRP disc brakes front and FRPP discs back.
http://www.gascc.ie

kalli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 04:51 PM   #17
wrenchturner75
2nd Gear Member
1988 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
wrenchturner75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Vehicle: 88lx
Location: pa
Posts: 311
Default

ok kalli, heres what i would do at this point, set your initial where the engine likes it, advance it till you get max vacumn or rpm reading and tighten it down, let it sit for 2 or 3 min then try to restart it, if it starts hard retard it till it starts normal and check your timing and note what degrees you have, now you have your initial, now you want your max timing to be all in by 2500-3000 rpm, no later. try a lighter set of springs to get it to come in sooner. ive gotten lucky already by glueing small pieces of vacumn tubing over the advance pins to limit total advance, some guys as mentioned above actually weld the slots, a lot of work but its guranteed to work! try to limit the total timing to 36-38 degrees no more or you will have a ping, this should work well enough that you may not even need the vacumn advance. and im sure you already know to have the vacum hose off the vacumn advance and plugged while doing all of this. good luck it takes patience but the results are well worth it, by the way i feel your carb is too small for your app, if you can try a 750 i think itll put a **** eatin grin on your face!
__________________
http://www.supermotors.net/20622 351 cleveland powered, nuff said!
wrenchturner75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 05:01 PM   #18
kalli
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 1964, Ford, Mustang
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 4,097
Default

thanks for the ideas. next thing i'll do will definetly be to restrict the advance, so they won't go past 36
i'll try the lighter spring as well to have it kick in earlier, but will check on the centrifugal advance and ho i can limit it first
__________________
1964 1/2
302ci, Edelbrock RPM heads and cam, 650 speed demon, Long Tube headers and Flowmaster 40s
Quick Performance Racing 9" rear, Moser axles, 3.5:1 trac-loc from FRPP and T5 transmission.
CSRP disc brakes front and FRPP discs back.
http://www.gascc.ie

kalli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 05:13 PM   #19
kalli
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 1964, Ford, Mustang
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 4,097
Default

I FOUND THEM !!!! those bloody spring and lock set. 3 hours searching, well worth it. i'm excited to try them tomorrow, just download the manual to see what each of them does. the great thing is I can limit it to 36, no matter what springs I have and then fool around with the springs to curve it with a fixed max at 36 :-) happy days




__________________
1964 1/2
302ci, Edelbrock RPM heads and cam, 650 speed demon, Long Tube headers and Flowmaster 40s
Quick Performance Racing 9" rear, Moser axles, 3.5:1 trac-loc from FRPP and T5 transmission.
CSRP disc brakes front and FRPP discs back.
http://www.gascc.ie


Last edited by kalli; 08-24-2009 at 06:07 PM.
kalli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 02:05 AM   #20
Starfury
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 4,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrenchturner75 View Post
by the way i feel your carb is too small for your app...
750 is way too big for a 302. It's too big for my 331, even. Even at 100% VE, which the engine will never see, that's 524CFM @ 6k. There's nothing wrong wih the 570 he has on it right now. Overcarbing is only going to result in decreased throttle response and fuel efficiency.

Glad you found the set, Kalli Good luck!
__________________
Tad H.
'67 Fastback
331 stroker
Starfury is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company