The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-29-2009, 07:46 PM   #21
OCHOHILL
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Vehicle: 66 coupe
Location: az
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67t5ponycoupe View Post
I have been putting 67 strutrods on 65/66' for years. They bolt right on and do everything those high dollar ones do without the high cost. As far as ford being cheap on not putting them on the 65/66 I don't think that is the case. The front end adjustment on the 65/66 is completely different with all adjustments being made with shims on the upper A arms. It didn't really make sense to use adjustable strut rods until they went with the camber adjustment on the lower A arm and that didn't happen until 67
The idea of the aftermarket strut rods is to limit fore and aft movement of the lower control arm during braking/suspension movement.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
OCHOHILL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 09:22 PM   #22
JamesW
Moderator
1965 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northernish Eastish Central Texas
Posts: 2,984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OCHOHILL View Post
The idea of the aftermarket strut rods is to limit fore and aft movement of the lower control arm during braking/suspension movement.
But the original point is well taken. 65-66 LCAs do not pivot or adjust. If you dial anything but an ever so minor adjustment, it will bind the LCA. If you're just correcting the bad bushing situation, and are trying to limit the travel fore/aft, then adjustable arms are a good approach. If you're trying to make a front end alignment adjustment, they aren't a good idea.
__________________

If you're reading this, thank a Teacher.
If you're reading this in English, thank an American Soldier.

JamesW's Website
JamesW is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1965, 1967, 65, 66, adjustable, arms, forums, global, mustang, rod, rods, strut, struts, tcp, west

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company