The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-28-2009, 11:32 PM   #1
int1m1d8r
1969 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 69 Mustang Coupe
Location: Virginia
Posts: 9
Default 69 Coupe w/ vibrating 289...

Hello all,

New guy here... both to this forum as well as to Mustangs. Always enjoyed them and have a chance now to work on one for a friend of mine.

It was born with a 250/3-Speed in it and his dad found a 289 to put in it. I know it's not the correct motor for that year, and the motor vibrates. It's a fairly rhythmic vibration and balances out at various RPM levels then returns at others.

I read on one forum that a guy suggested a need to replace his flex plate or he'd have vibration issues. Was wondering if there was a chance this 289 doesn't match up with the flywheel of this 3-Speed so well and possibly causing the vibration issues.

Motor mounts are good... his dad says it ran well when he put it in... The motor seems to run well, just has a pretty bad vibrational issue.

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks!
Int1m1d8r
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
int1m1d8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 11:59 PM   #2
MonsterBilly
2nd Gear Member
1966 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Vehicle: 66 coupe
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 458
Default

Could be, do you mean a 200 I6 that it had?
__________________
66 coupe, 289, T5, Stealth Intake, Holley 670 Street Avenger, Centerforce Clutch, Headman Headers, Pypes Exhaust, Lunati Cam
MonsterBilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 08:21 PM   #3
int1m1d8r
1969 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 69 Mustang Coupe
Location: Virginia
Posts: 9
Default

Thanks for the quick reply. He was sure he had the optional 250. I also double-checked the VIN to confirm it as well. Engine code is "L".

Could be a real long shot (the mismatch of the flywheel w/ the motor)... just was interesting that I read a post about it causing vibrational issues and that we can't pinpoint the issue on this car. We suspect it will turn out to be something odd. While we're not professional mechanics, we can get a few steps beyond the basics.

Meanwhile... the tear-down continues...

Thanks!
Int1m1d8r
int1m1d8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 08:32 PM   #4
Stepman
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Vehicle: 69 coupe
Location: Az
Posts: 845
Default

umm...which flywheel is in the car? Did you use one for the 289? If not, that is most likely the problem.
Stepman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 08:50 PM   #5
int1m1d8r
1969 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 69 Mustang Coupe
Location: Virginia
Posts: 9
Default

Stepman, thanks! I'll ask that question tomorrow. It would be nice to learn that it is something like that. The motor seems to run fine (barring the vibration of course)... no odd sounds or otherwise discouraging behavior.

Thanks!
Int1m1d8r
int1m1d8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 11:02 PM   #6
int1m1d8r
1969 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 69 Mustang Coupe
Location: Virginia
Posts: 9
Default

Turns out the flywheel was indeed bought from a junkyard, so the possibility that it is incorrect is certainly there. Now I'll have to read up on identifying the flywheel type and ensuring it matches the motor...

Thanks to everyone...
Int1m1d8r
int1m1d8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 12:17 PM   #7
urban_cowboy
4th Gear Member
1969 Ford Mustang
 
urban_cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: '69 Mustang Mach1
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,695
Default

There are different balances or rather inbalances to flywheels. 0oz, 28oz, and 50oz are popular on Ford small blocks. Depending on what others before you have done, a 302 based small block may need any of the three. This also goes for the harmonic balancer. The only way to tell what you need for sure is to have the crank checked.

I put a 50oz flywheel on a 351W that needed a 28oz on accident year ago. The engine ran like a big cam motor without the getup and go...just the shaking.

Does the motor vibrate just reving it up standing still or could this shaking be tied to speed or movement?

How do you motor mounts look?

Is the car missing at all or is is running correctly?
__________________

"Yeah, were runnin a little bit hot tonight. I can barely see the road from the heat comin' off of it." Van Halen
urban_cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 01:45 PM   #8
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Vehicle: 77 II, 06 GT
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 7,891
Send a message via AIM to my77stang Send a message via MSN to my77stang Send a message via Yahoo to my77stang
Default

if it's a 289 it needs the 289/early 302 flywheel with the 28oz imbalance.
__________________
my77stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 11:45 PM   #9
Carlos Pineiro
3rd Gear Member
 
Carlos Pineiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Vehicle: 1969 Mustang Grande (modified) Winter Blue Metallic
Location: Santa Monica, Calif.
Posts: 899
Default

Flywheels can be had for $40-$50 if you shop around. Be sure the tooth count matches.

CP
__________________
.
Daily Drivers Rock.
Carlos Pineiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 12:22 AM   #10
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: 67 Mustang Coupe
Location: California
Posts: 7,341
Default

289 needs both the 28oz flywheel AND balancer. Stock 50oz flywheels used a 34oz balancer. Make sure they're both correct for the engine. Keep in mind that the balance is to prevent harmonics from causing the crankshaft to break, so don't drive it.
__________________
Who cares how much horsepower it has, all that matters is how fast it goes!

13.20's with 2.25-2.30 60's, 40+ year old suspension sucks!
Best trap 107.11mph, we'll see what the new intake/carb setup does.
12.80 at 110.5mph NHRA DA corrected
67mustang302 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1969, 289, 69, bad, coupe, exhaust, gears, mustang, original, rhythmic, speed, vibration

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company