The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-02-2009, 08:43 PM   #1
ic237
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 1966 ford mustang
Location: florida
Posts: 29
Default 289 engine rebuild or replace.

Hey Guys,
I need some advice. I bought a 66 mustang with a 289 v8 about two weeks ago. About 10 miles into the trip home from the big buy, I noticed the temp starting to climb. earlier I drove around the town with the seller and it didnt overheat. So I didnt know what was going on. The temp starting climbing slowly and surely. Right when I was getting off the highway the motor started knocking and stalled. I had to tow it home. The next day, I topped her off and ran the motor. I smelled coolant in the exhaust. And the knock was still there. I pulled the heads and sent it to the machine shop the valves were not bent. So I bought new push rods and lifters. The guy said no cracks and shaved .010 inches off the heads. Bought a new tstat, and radiator. Put it all together. And the motor runs and its not burning coolant, But the knock is there and seems to be getting worse. I have never heard of lower end damage from overheating, so I dont know what to think anymore. I am thinking of getting a crate engine. What route would you guys take? I dont know anyone with a 289 motor. Is that worth rebuilding, or swapping it out more logical for the long haul? What your input ? If rebuilding is worth it would you go stock or upgraded cam , pistons, ect?

Thanks guys!
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
ic237 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 10:19 PM   #2
2+2GT
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Vehicle: 66 Mustang 2+2GT
Location: PA
Posts: 1,572
Default

If you have the original engine, the car will always be worth more than with some other engine. Fix it if you can. "upgrade" is up to you. The 289 can be modified to produce enough power to get your wife to tell you to sell it.
2+2GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 05:13 AM   #3
kalli
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicle: 1964, Ford, Mustang
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 4,097
Default

i hardly ever see a car with original engine. so that's probably the first thiong i'd check. chances are good with yours. however i've seen an engine with crack in the bore, we checked heads and rad, put it together and the problem was still there. i gave him my old block (my heads were bad) and he was good to go again. just to say it could be the bottom end. fella drove off and overheated again as he snapped a fan belt. we told him to change it straight away as we didn't have one lying around ... anyway ... 2+2 is right with his 289 statement there ;-)
__________________
1964 1/2
302ci, Edelbrock RPM heads and cam, 650 speed demon, Long Tube headers and Flowmaster 40s
Quick Performance Racing 9" rear, Moser axles, 3.5:1 trac-loc from FRPP and T5 transmission.
CSRP disc brakes front and FRPP discs back.
http://www.gascc.ie

kalli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 08:49 AM   #4
JDraper
1st Gear Member
 
JDraper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 1966 Coupe, 2004 Mach 1
Location: Central PA
Posts: 99
Default

All of this really depends upon what you want out of your car. If you're looking to keep it original or close to original, then you need to consider rebuilding, or at least getting a date correct short block for the car. (Matching #'s don't exist in a regular '66 Mustang, it all has to do with date codes).

If you don't care about originality, then it's up to you. Personally, I'm a huge fan of the 289 motor and would put one back in. As mentioned above, you can make a 289 pretty dang strong if you want. I've worked over our 289 with new heads, new cam, bored .040 over, new internals..etc and it's fairly quick. Almost keeps up with my '04 Mach.

If you're looking for something hot to run and really want a bigger motor, I'd go with a 347 stroker.



Kalli, your mods sound just about like mine, except I've got my motor mods based on a 289 block.
__________________

'66 Coupe, '04 Mach 1, '05 F-150 SCrew, '08 Focus

Last edited by JDraper; 10-03-2009 at 08:52 AM.
JDraper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 12:28 PM   #5
ic237
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 1966 ford mustang
Location: florida
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDraper View Post
All of this really depends upon what you want out of your car. If you're looking to keep it original or close to original, then you need to consider rebuilding, or at least getting a date correct short block for the car. (Matching #'s don't exist in a regular '66 Mustang, it all has to do with date codes).

If you don't care about originality, then it's up to you. Personally, I'm a huge fan of the 289 motor and would put one back in. As mentioned above, you can make a 289 pretty dang strong if you want. I've worked over our 289 with new heads, new cam, bored .040 over, new internals..etc and it's fairly quick. Almost keeps up with my '04 Mach.

If you're looking for something hot to run and really want a bigger motor, I'd go with a 347 stroker.



Kalli, your mods sound just about like mine, except I've got my motor mods based on a 289 block.
What is a date code? I was looking in summit racing's website. I see the have 347 short blocks for a little over 2k. Would the heads , intake from the 289 fall into place?

The cars is actually my wifes. She really doesnt need a 7000 rpm motor or a 5mpg car either. I am actually trying to find the intersecting lines between effeciency , power , and longivity. Originallity is not a real concern for me but it would be nice.

Thanks for the help
ic237 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 01:06 PM   #6
eZ
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,621
Default

Ill sell you the 5.0 thats in my car now
__________________
eZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 01:15 PM   #7
racer_dave
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Vehicle: 1967 Mustang Fastback
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13
Default

You need to find out what's wrong first. If its still knocking then it's bound up on the lower end somewhere. Take it all apart and find the problem. This costs nothing more than the cost of gaskets to rebuild. Then, if the block is cracked do what you want as you can't keep the original block.

If it was burning coolant then its possible the coolant got in the oil, which then broke down and you siezed a rod bearing. Still, its a cheap fix. A new crank is what about $75 for a stock cast one? A full rebuild kit with all the bearings is another $150?? (Not sure, but still way cheaper than a crate replacement)

Why get rid of the whole engine when you don't even know what's wrong?

There isn't any big mystery to working or building your own engine. Anyone can do it with hand tools and a decent machine shop to do the parts you can't.
racer_dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 01:42 PM   #8
2+2GT
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Vehicle: 66 Mustang 2+2GT
Location: PA
Posts: 1,572
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ic237 View Post
What is a date code? I was looking in summit racing's website. I see the have 347 short blocks for a little over 2k. Would the heads , intake from the 289 fall into place?

The cars is actually my wifes. She really doesnt need a 7000 rpm motor or a 5mpg car either. I am actually trying to find the intersecting lines between effeciency , power , and longivity. Originallity is not a real concern for me but it would be nice.
The date code is the small number above the "C8":


You sure don't need a 347 for a snappy driving car. A nice hydraulic cam an 600 cfm carb is all you need. Well, a number of small inexpensive details will help. You could even leave it looking stone stock. This car has a 289:
2+2GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 03:22 PM   #9
JDraper
1st Gear Member
 
JDraper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 1966 Coupe, 2004 Mach 1
Location: Central PA
Posts: 99
Default

Just FYI, you can get a completely remanufactured 289 or 302 engine from CJ Pony parts for about $2300 with a 3 year/75k warranty on it.
__________________

'66 Coupe, '04 Mach 1, '05 F-150 SCrew, '08 Focus
JDraper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 03:29 PM   #10
JDraper
1st Gear Member
 
JDraper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Vehicle: 1966 Coupe, 2004 Mach 1
Location: Central PA
Posts: 99
Default

Oh, and here's what a little mod work to a 289 will do. We have Edelbrock Performer heads, Edelbrock intake, cam, roller rockers, MAC long tubes, Holley 570 Street Avenger carb, Flowmasters with an H pipe, 3.55 gears and a T-5 in this car:

__________________

'66 Coupe, '04 Mach 1, '05 F-150 SCrew, '08 Focus
JDraper is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
289, 66, classic, cost, engine, ford, kit, motor, mustang, pennsylvania, rebuild, rebuilder, rebuilt, sale, york

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company