The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-20-2009, 07:12 PM   #11
matt_lamb_160
 
matt_lamb_160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1967, Ford, Fairlane
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by THUMPIN455 View Post
Ive fully ported a few sets of both early 289/302 heads and a couple sets of 5.0 heads from roller engines. One thing you REALY dont want to do is mess with the short turn in the port floor. If you want to kill flow and make them run like crap, grind that puppy down so it looks straighter. Smooth it but dont change the shape, the rest you can hog out pretty big.

Still you wont get the same power you will from a decent set of aluminum heads. For a stock looking build you can do ok on power if you are smart about where you remove metal.
Yeah, that seems to be a very common statement. Thanks mate. I don't really intend on making any part of the port bigger, just plan on making it how it would be had the casting been better. I will not lower the floor.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
matt_lamb_160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 04:12 PM   #12
2+2GT
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Vehicle: 66 Mustang 2+2GT
Location: PA
Posts: 1,547
Default

The original design was not bad, but rough foundry work and addition of smog bumps usually made a mess of the ports. If you smooth off the smog bumps and open the gasket surface to the original contour of the port they work pretty well.

2+2GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 07:14 PM   #13
matt_lamb_160
 
matt_lamb_160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1967, Ford, Fairlane
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 36
Default

I had no idea there were two types of smog bump. Which years had which?
matt_lamb_160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 07:42 PM   #14
2+2GT
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Vehicle: 66 Mustang 2+2GT
Location: PA
Posts: 1,547
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matt_lamb_160 View Post
I had no idea there were two types of smog bump. Which years had which?
Wasn't a year thing, so much as which foundry/engine plant.
2+2GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 09:48 PM   #15
htwheelz67
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 497
Default

bowl work, blending into ports and under the valve really help sbf heads, it takes some majojor work to get them to flow good though, id look into aftermarket heads even gt-40's unless you are experienced at porting heads, otherwise grind the bumps off and do a gasket match about 1" into the head, you might see 10hp if your lucky.

Frankly a cam (especially a custom one) will give much more improvement than a gasket match, a dual pattern cam with 10-15 degs more exhaust duration and 108-110 lca with a higher lift rocker on the exhaust will wake up a poor flowing head.
__________________
67 vert, 408 stroker 205cc TW heads, CI cust hyd roller,Dougs 1 3/4 try y's, global west neg roll,lentech aod...etc etc etc

Last edited by htwheelz67; 10-21-2009 at 09:52 PM.
htwheelz67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 10:13 PM   #16
Starfury
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 4,467
Default

But a poor flowing head won't take full advantage of a better cam.
__________________
Tad H.
'67 Fastback
331 stroker
Starfury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 11:16 PM   #17
matt_lamb_160
 
matt_lamb_160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1967, Ford, Fairlane
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by htwheelz67 View Post
bowl work, blending into ports and under the valve really help sbf heads, it takes some majojor work to get them to flow good though, id look into aftermarket heads even gt-40's unless you are experienced at porting heads, otherwise grind the bumps off and do a gasket match about 1" into the head, you might see 10hp if your lucky.

Frankly a cam (especially a custom one) will give much more improvement than a gasket match, a dual pattern cam with 10-15 degs more exhaust duration and 108-110 lca with a higher lift rocker on the exhaust will wake up a poor flowing head.
Yeah mate I am doing bowl work as well. My question was whether or not the hole for the gas recirculation would effect flow. But thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starfury View Post
But a poor flowing head won't take full advantage of a better cam.
That's right!
matt_lamb_160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 12:04 AM   #18
matt_lamb_160
 
matt_lamb_160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Vehicle: 1967, Ford, Fairlane
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 36
Default

Was it only Californian heads which actually had a hole for the gas recirculation? Did the others just have a provision for it?
matt_lamb_160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 12:56 PM   #19
2+2GT
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Vehicle: 66 Mustang 2+2GT
Location: PA
Posts: 1,547
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matt_lamb_160 View Post
Was it only Californian heads which actually had a hole for the gas recirculation? Did the others just have a provision for it?
Yeah, there were a lot of heads that had the bumps, but were not drilled for the injectors. Whether they were drilled or not, the exhaust flow was pretty bad. I'd estimate the improvement at more than 10hp on smog heads, I believe I got more than that on my non-smog 65 heads.
2+2GT is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1966, 351, 50l, 66, emission, exhaust, head, home, hump, mustang, porting, ports, removal, smog, system, thermactor, valves

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company