The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Classic Mustangs
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-05-2009, 06:03 PM   #1
indystang66
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Vehicle: 1966, ford, mustang
Location: indiana
Posts: 15
Default Headers vs. Manifolds

66 hi-po 289

The manifold I have on now are pretty rusted.

So..Should I Get repro Manifold, Some Hooker Headers, or so repro headers.


Option 1: 65-67 MUSTANG HI-PO CAST IRON MANIFOLDS - PR. THIS QUALITY REPRODUCTION COMES WITH CORRECT OEM CASTING NUMBERS. ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT SET FEATURED ON COBRAS AND MUSTANGS WITH HI-PO "K" MOTOR

Option 2: Mustang Hedman Hedders
Increase performance and fuel mileage with a pair of Hedman Hedders.

Option 3: Newer high performance Flowmaster (or other brand)

Whats the difference In power and sound?


Also Exhaust: should get repro stock duals, or should I go with a flowmasters. Or stock with flowmaster muffler

Again difference in power/sound?

Option 1: 65-66 MUSTANG 2" DUAL EXHAUST KIT WITH FLOWMASTER MUFFLER. USE WITH ORIGINAL STYLE HANGERS.

Option 2: 65-66 MUSTANG ALUMINIZED EXHAUST KIT, 289 K CODE HI-PO DUAL 2".THIS KIT IS COMPLETE MINUS HANGERS AND CLAMPS. DESIGNED TO FIT AND FUNCTION JUST LIKE THE ORIGINALS AND INSTALL WITH ORIGINAL HANGERS AND CLAMPS.

Option 3: Newer high performance Flowmaster (or other brand)

Thanks for your time.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
indystang66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 06:12 PM   #2
Starfury
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 4,467
Default

Is this an actual K code car? If so, I'd stick with the manifolds you have. Just because they're rusty doesn't mean they can't be fixed up. If you pull them off and have them cleaned and bead blasted, they'll be as good as new. They'll also be quieter under the hood than a set of headers, and you won't have to deal with leaky header gaskets all the time.

As far as exhaust, unless it's a show car, I'd recommend 2-1/4" dual exhaust with your choice of mufflers. I hate Flowmaster 40's. They're obnoxiously loud, blatty, tend to drone, and they have terrible flow characteristics. I much prefer Magnaflow or Dynomax. I run Hushpower mufflers and absolutely love them, but they're quite a bit more expensive than most performance mufflers.
__________________
Tad H.
'67 Fastback
331 stroker
Starfury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:39 PM   #3
LynnBob Mustang
4th Gear Member
 
LynnBob Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 1999 GT
Location: PA
Posts: 1,467
Default

I'd go with a set of Tri -y's and a Shelby exhaust.

Lynn
__________________

'99 GT automatic
CDC Shaker scoop, K&N Filter
MAC cat back
Max Speed 1 ˝” Lowering springs
KYB GR2 shocks and struts
Cobra front brakes

'65 Mustang coupe in progress
LynnBob Mustang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:58 PM   #4
indystang66
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Vehicle: 1966, ford, mustang
Location: indiana
Posts: 15
Default

whats good about the tri-y's?
indystang66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 08:16 PM   #5
LynnBob Mustang
4th Gear Member
 
LynnBob Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 1999 GT
Location: PA
Posts: 1,467
Default

They flow good and I love the Shelby sound that goes with them. I have road in and drove several Shelby's when I was in my late teens and they sound better then anything any of these header makers make IMO.

Not too much to be obnoxious, but enough to let you know they are there when you open it up.

Lynn
__________________

'99 GT automatic
CDC Shaker scoop, K&N Filter
MAC cat back
Max Speed 1 ˝” Lowering springs
KYB GR2 shocks and struts
Cobra front brakes

'65 Mustang coupe in progress
LynnBob Mustang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 08:21 PM   #6
rmodel65
2nd Amendment Gear Member
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Vehicle: 1965, ford, mustang fastback
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 9,371
Send a message via AIM to rmodel65 Send a message via MSN to rmodel65 Send a message via Yahoo to rmodel65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by indystang66 View Post
whats good about the tri-y's?


well for one they are period correct and have great low and mid range torque which is what you need for coming out of the twisties etc....

but modern header tech far exceeds their design... i have tri-ys on my car though
__________________


Founder Rmodel's Mustang Militia



“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”
~Samuel Adams
rmodel65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 08:37 PM   #7
indystang66
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Vehicle: 1966, ford, mustang
Location: indiana
Posts: 15
Default

Thanks for all the help so far.

Can anyone tell me the differences between the original manifold and the tri-y's..

Power and sound differences??

Thanks
indystang66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 08:43 PM   #8
Starfury
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 4,467
Default

Well, we've yet to establish if you have an actual K code car/motor. Answer depends on that.
__________________
Tad H.
'67 Fastback
331 stroker
Starfury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:06 PM   #9
indystang66
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Vehicle: 1966, ford, mustang
Location: indiana
Posts: 15
Default

Yes, it is a K code. But Why does that matter? Didnt all the 289's come with manifold options anyways?

But yes its a K code.. So whats better the manifolds or headers? and what is the difference in power/sound?
indystang66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:40 PM   #10
rmodel65
2nd Amendment Gear Member
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Vehicle: 1965, ford, mustang fastback
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 9,371
Send a message via AIM to rmodel65 Send a message via MSN to rmodel65 Send a message via Yahoo to rmodel65
Default

if its a K code you want to keep it stock imho.....
__________________


Founder Rmodel's Mustang Militia



“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”
~Samuel Adams
rmodel65 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1965, cast, code, forum, header, headers, hedders, hedmen, hooker, iron, manifold, manifolds, mustang

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company