Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

SUPERCHARGED GT vs SHELBY 500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2007, 04:22 PM
  #31  
06Saleen3V
6th Gear Member
 
06Saleen3V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 6,414
Default RE: SUPERCHARGED GT vs SHELBY 500

ORIGINAL: mattblasi


ORIGINAL: Bmr4life

ORIGINAL: mattblasi

OK so this question opens multiple debates as to who would or would not win and no one figures out everything but her is my 2 cents.

First I have a 409rwhp/410rwtrq turbocharged (turbonetics kit) 07 Mustang GT with stock block and stock automatic transmission. I have in the last 2 weeks beaten a srt10 viper, a viper gts coupe, a 04 cobra, 2 gt500s and my neighbors pretty yellow z06.

There are certain things to consider, who will hook first who weights what and who has not only the most power but the ability to use it.

Yes GT500s are front end heavy, this is a disadvantage to them stock and in road courses, however with alot less than what I spent on my turbokit I could have an extra 200+ rwhp in a gt500.

Vipers are great, I have driven every model ever made, but the one constant (and viper owners will admit this too) is that they suck for getting traction. This also hold true to the new Z06 vettes. While yes from a roll they would do better.

Now lets consider the idea of my car which mind you dose not loose boost while shifting and is quiet up until the last min when the wastegate opens, most people do not expect me to be as fast as I am on the road. Those who claim an automatic hurts them in a drag race should probably have the tune checked because it has done nothing but help me, although I will admit a manual is more fun on the road to bang through the gears.

Now to be perfectly clear the SRT and the z06 I raced were both froma dig, had it been a roll it would have been a bit closer, I raced 1 gt500 from a dig and one from a roll, the GTS coupe and 04 cobra were also from a roll.

Now beyond the car consider the driver, in a manual transmission he has to be at least decent at shifting and launching to be as good as the magazines all make out, so there is a possible advantage as well.

The who would win question just has too many variables, take it to a track and find out what could it hurt to loose.
I have to say you beat all those car because you are an automatic. No other way to explain it.

And yet i still get **** for being an automatic soo often
Funny the guy who tells youthat you are winningbecause you arean auto has an auto....
06Saleen3V is offline  
Old 10-28-2007, 07:29 PM
  #32  
Dante@HCM
 
Dante@HCM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 9
Default RE: SUPERCHARGED GT vs SHELBY 500

ORIGINAL: Skunkworks

http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co...ons/index.html

Dont get me started on blower swaps.
agreed, stick a whipple with a right tune on a GT500 and you have 700hp to the wheels easy.
Dante@HCM is offline  
Old 10-28-2007, 07:32 PM
  #33  
blueherd02gt
5th Gear Member
 
blueherd02gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,182
Default RE: SUPERCHARGED GT vs SHELBY 500

And and intercooler....
blueherd02gt is offline  
Old 10-28-2007, 07:47 PM
  #34  
22kart22
4th Gear Member
 
22kart22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,885
Default RE: SUPERCHARGED GT vs SHELBY 500

yeppers
22kart22 is offline  
Old 10-28-2007, 10:44 PM
  #35  
viking396
5th Gear Member
 
viking396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,235
Default RE: SUPERCHARGED GT vs SHELBY 500

ORIGINAL: Mellowdien

No way a stock GT500 can run low 12's with street tires.
Full stock they run about 13 flat, www.modernracer.com

They get about the same times as stock 03/04 Termi's but have much more potential.
As some mentioned before you can get lots of power from minor bolt-ons, and if you'd have the budget, take off the eaton s/c and slap on a kb and dust those vipers!
ORIGINAL: ohsixgt1217

GT500 is about 420 rwhp stock. Stock they are low 12 sec cars.

A simple pulley and a tune they are around 475-480 rwhp and will wipe the floor with a s/c GT, easily. They will be low 11's without a problem, maybe high 10's.

Pulley and tune will run less then $1,000. They are just very conservative from the factory. Ford doesnt want people breaking ****.
Strange, a couple friends of mine got low 12's in bone stock trim in their GT500's... Why is it people say "no way" all the time. Back a few years ago people said no way a 2003 Cobra could run mid 12's stock, yet most did.

The GT500 is very easily a mid 12 second car and with the right driver a low 12 second car.
viking396 is offline  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:03 PM
  #36  
Burke0011
2nd Gear Member
 
Burke0011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 361
Default RE: SUPERCHARGED GT vs SHELBY 500

http://www.vmptuning.com/forum/showthread.php?t=621

Justin from VMP Tuning did a 12.3 @ 116 in his GT 500 soon after he got it

Street tires, stock pulley - just one of his tunes loaded, that's it
Burke0011 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bokeo
Street/Strip
6
10-10-2015 08:28 PM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM
MustangForums Editor
GT350 S550 Tech
1
09-29-2015 03:29 PM



Quick Reply: SUPERCHARGED GT vs SHELBY 500



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 PM.