400 RWHP N/A VS 400 RWHP FI
#1
400 RWHP N/A VS 400 RWHP FI
Is there a difference between FI power and N/A power? I mean FI is easier to obtain obviously but you hear so much HP is too much when you supercharge but what about N/A what are the advantages to N/A power if there are any? Thanks
#4
RE: 400 RWHP N/A VS 400 RWHP FI
ORIGINAL: nate2953
Is there a difference between FI power and N/A power? I mean FI is easier to obtain obviously but you hear so much HP is too much when you supercharge but what about N/A what are the advantages to N/A power if there are any? Thanks
Is there a difference between FI power and N/A power? I mean FI is easier to obtain obviously but you hear so much HP is too much when you supercharge but what about N/A what are the advantages to N/A power if there are any? Thanks
Realistically there isn't 400 N/A horsepower available (until one dives into stroking & raising compression & redline), so one needs to figure out how much power they want, and that will decide whether they go boosted or not.
Tom
#6
RE: 400 RWHP N/A VS 400 RWHP FI
im thinking with BBR heads, a BBR cam, some JBA long tubes and JBA catted H pipe plus what all i already have and my current numbers safely 375 RWHP isnt out of the picture. Yeah a KB or whipple would put me at 425 RWHP no questions asked but ive already sunk so much money into a C&L, CMCVs, UDPs, etc, that id just like to stay N/A. But anyways, doing all that work just seems like more fun and enjoyable to install than doing one blower and being done with modifying the stang. So part of staying N/A is the enjoyment of putting on new parts. Anyhoo, i was just wondering if there was any advantage to staying N/A over FI thanks guys, you all are the best
#8
RE: 400 RWHP N/A VS 400 RWHP FI
im no expert on this, but i feel like N/A is safer because you dont have that boost blowing into your engine, putting a large amount of strain on the engine (larger than that of N/A)
#10
RE: 400 RWHP N/A VS 400 RWHP FI
You say it like it's 100psi, which could be considered a lot of pressure. Get a small air tank and put 10 psi in it, then let it out, ain't that much pressure is it? It's the pistons moving up and down quicker that breaks things.
KtownGt, I think all the twin screws add atleast 100lbs, whipple is 150 including everything, i think.
KtownGt, I think all the twin screws add atleast 100lbs, whipple is 150 including everything, i think.
ORIGINAL: batmobile2005
im no expert on this, but i feel like N/A is safer because you dont have that boost blowing into your engine, putting a large amount of strain on the engine (larger than that of N/A)
im no expert on this, but i feel like N/A is safer because you dont have that boost blowing into your engine, putting a large amount of strain on the engine (larger than that of N/A)