Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Displacement and...math (Sorry)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2013, 06:39 PM
  #1  
JFitz
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
JFitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 417
Default Displacement and...math (Sorry)

Ford reps welcome to shed some light here.

Ok so, in another thread, I found this.

302 cubic inches on the 5.0 V8.

5 liters converts to 305.12 cubic inches. I'm not the best at math but my own ramblings on paper and google confirm this.

I'll chuck in another one - 4.6 liters converts to 280.71 cubic inches. I'm just kinda impressed by this figure because of the old 1 hp per cubic inch rule. Now we have a 280 (1 if we round?) that puts out 300 ft lbs of torque and 300 HP stock?
Ok ok, anyway. Where is Ford getting 302? Is this just one of those things because we like seeing "302" on the side for nostalgic reasons?
JFitz is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 06:48 PM
  #2  
CMcNam
3rd Gear Member
 
CMcNam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 874
Default

Originally Posted by JFitz
Is this just one of those things because we like seeing "302" on the side for nostalgic reasons?
Sure is!
CMcNam is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 06:51 PM
  #3  
jpplaw
3rd Gear Member
 
jpplaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 690
Default

Bore x Bore x Stroke x 8 x .7854

3.63 x 3.63 x 3.65 x 8 x .7854 = 302.19
jpplaw is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 07:15 PM
  #4  
JFitz
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
JFitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 417
Default

AH! More math.
JFitz is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 07:18 PM
  #5  
mapitts
3rd Gear Member
 
mapitts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Decatur AL
Posts: 823
Default

Originally Posted by jpplaw
Bore x Bore x Stroke x 8 x .7854

3.63 x 3.63 x 3.65 x 8 x .7854 = 302.19
We have a winner!
mapitts is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 07:24 PM
  #6  
jpplaw
3rd Gear Member
 
jpplaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 690
Default

Originally Posted by mapitts
We have a winner!
And will soon have 3.7 x 3.7 x 3.8 x 8 x .7854 = 326.86 !!
jpplaw is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 07:43 PM
  #7  
JFitz
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
JFitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 417
Default

I didn't know there was a formula for it.



JFitz is offline  
Old 03-21-2013, 07:44 PM
  #8  
CMcNam
3rd Gear Member
 
CMcNam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 874
Default

I don't do maths good so if what jpplaw says is correct then go with that.
CMcNam is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 05:09 AM
  #9  
jpplaw
3rd Gear Member
 
jpplaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 690
Default

I memorized that formula a longgg time ago when I was building circle track engines
jpplaw is offline  
Old 03-23-2013, 11:51 AM
  #10  
157dB
Cut & Paste Expert
 
157dB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 13,322
Default

Engine Displacement Equation

The equation for any displacement in cubic inches is as follows:

π ÷ 4 (b2) (stroke) (number of cylinders)

That is pi divided by four, 0.7854, multiplied by the cylinder bore squared. Cylinder bore is the diameter (in inches) of each cylinder, times that number again. Multiply that by the stroke in inches of the crankshaft. In other words the distance each piston in the engine travels from bottom to top dead center. And finally multiply that by the number of cylinders that exist in that engine.
157dB is offline  


Quick Reply: Displacement and...math (Sorry)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM.