Underpowered or not :/
#31
it's a naturally aspirated engine, with the mods you did you aren't going to pick up that much power. as it is, you're getting more hp at the wheels than the stock engine is rated for at the flywheel, so you got something. Sad thing is even the 3V heads don't flow all that well so unless you go with forced induction you're not going to see any huge gains.
Last edited by nola504boy; 06-13-2014 at 11:07 PM.
#32
The funny thing is my car put down 302rwhp/324tq with just pypes mid muffler system and cai/dyno tune. I really think different cars come off the assembly some faster than others. Can't wait to see what I pick up with my hot rod cams in two weeks. If I pick up any more at that.
#34
2.3 60 foot is killing your ET. 108 is pretty good trap speed. What track? time of day? You can look up the DA for your area here. http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...calculator.php
The Air conditions affect everything.
The Air conditions affect everything.
#35
2.3 60 foot is killing your ET. 108 is pretty good trap speed. What track? time of day? You can look up the DA for your area here. http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...calculator.php
The Air conditions affect everything.
The Air conditions affect everything.
#36
Just remember this, the more miles per hour you're gaining, the more horsepower your car is producing. E.T. is traction. If your car originally ran 100 mph in the 1/4, and now it's pulling 106 mph, then you've made quite a gain with just minor mods.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MCR
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
31
12-20-2014 10:03 AM
Mryoung
Speed Density/Carb/SSP section
1
03-27-2014 01:15 PM