Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

NA 3V Stroker dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2014, 10:03 AM
  #11  
2005Redfire6
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
2005Redfire6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 12,260
Default

Originally Posted by Ricardo
Your car is making nice numbers. And you are setup for boost later on. Are you going to go with boost later or try to bump up compression?
Gonna leave the compression as-is and probably run nitrous.

Originally Posted by breathegood
Yeah, that torque curve is more broad and flat than a stock 3V. You have no reason to be disappointed in the peak numbers if you are planning F/I. No go pull some stumps!
It does feel like it runs pretty hard!
2005Redfire6 is offline  
Old 06-01-2014, 05:20 PM
  #12  
JCON
5th Gear Member
 
JCON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,215
Default

The car has potential with that build. My car made 330 rwhp and 336 rwtq on stock block-heads-cams, with intake, UDP, CMDP's, LT, O/R ProChamber, and 4.10's (*and I may have a compression leak).

Do you have the dyno run file you can email me? I have been thinking about stroking (or cams) but want to see a dyno sheet I can compare to mine in the dyno program.
JCON is offline  
Old 06-02-2014, 06:10 AM
  #13  
2005Redfire6
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
2005Redfire6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 12,260
Default

Originally Posted by JCON
The car has potential with that build. My car made 330 rwhp and 336 rwtq on stock block-heads-cams, with intake, UDP, CMDP's, LT, O/R ProChamber, and 4.10's (*and I may have a compression leak).

Do you have the dyno run file you can email me? I have been thinking about stroking (or cams) but want to see a dyno sheet I can compare to mine in the dyno program.
That is a lot of power with just those mods.

I need to scan the dyno sheet in and I can do that. If you're talking about the actual file, I don't have that.
2005Redfire6 is offline  
Old 06-02-2014, 04:40 PM
  #14  
JCON
5th Gear Member
 
JCON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,215
Default

Yeah I was talking about the .drf. The tuner, a mustang specialist, was surprised as well. He said that was about 10-15 more than he expected. He cut the dyno and said it was done making power but at 6k the line was still climbing, not falling (although should have fallen shortly after 6k). Have to do some compression testing but when all is confirmed, I plan to hit a different dyno and see how the results compare.
JCON is offline  
Old 06-02-2014, 05:35 PM
  #15  
gmoran1469
3rd Gear Member
 
gmoran1469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 738
Default

Originally Posted by JCON
My car made 330 rwhp and 336 rwtq on stock block-heads-cams, with intake, UDP, CMDP's, LT, O/R ProChamber, and 4.10's (*and I may have a compression leak).


Can you post the sheet because if so I am buying some new mods.
gmoran1469 is offline  
Old 06-03-2014, 05:49 AM
  #16  
JCON
5th Gear Member
 
JCON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,215
Default

https://mustangforums.com/forum/4-6l...3v-dynoed.html

I had this thread after the tune day but I'll repost the sheet:



The car feels solid and pulls great despite burning oil.

Last edited by JCON; 06-03-2014 at 05:53 AM.
JCON is offline  
Old 06-06-2014, 12:35 PM
  #17  
2005Redfire6
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
2005Redfire6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 12,260
Default

Originally Posted by JCON
https://mustangforums.com/forum/4-6l...3v-dynoed.html

I had this thread after the tune day but I'll repost the sheet:



The car feels solid and pulls great despite burning oil.

Interesting......
2005Redfire6 is offline  
Old 06-06-2014, 12:40 PM
  #18  
gmoran1469
3rd Gear Member
 
gmoran1469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 738
Default

Originally Posted by 2005Redfire6
Interesting......
Yeah, that's what I'm saying. 50 RWHP is a hell of a gain. I've been looking at the mods and I'm wondering how much the CMDP and UP combo would net with the stock exhaust.
gmoran1469 is offline  
Old 06-06-2014, 05:49 PM
  #19  
moosestang
6th Gear Member
 
moosestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 11,278
Default

Who did the tune? It's a built motor, throw some more timing at it!
moosestang is offline  
Old 06-06-2014, 10:45 PM
  #20  
JCON
5th Gear Member
 
JCON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,215
Default

Originally Posted by gmoran1469
Yeah, that's what I'm saying. 50 RWHP is a hell of a gain. I've been looking at the mods and I'm wondering how much the CMDP and UP combo would net with the stock exhaust.
The guy who tuned it was surprised. I can only guess that the intake really is a cut above the rest of them and some how my slightly ported and polish stock TB helped. After I figure out this compression issue, I plan to hit a different dyno than it was tuned on and see how consistent the numbers are.

Would really like to hit a track this summer.
JCON is offline  


Quick Reply: NA 3V Stroker dyno



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.