2010 6.2L 400HP
05-05-2008, 09:36 PM
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Outside of Philly PA
Posts: 298
2010 6.2L 400HP
05-05-2008, 09:39 PM
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: California
Posts: 319
RE: 2010 6.2L 400HP
NOOOO...lol
05-05-2008, 09:51 PM
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Posts: 16,182
RE: 2010 6.2L 400HP
<.... counting his pennies.... >
05-06-2008, 12:18 PM
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,246
RE: 2010 6.2L 400HP
not gonna happen. the 6.2L is going to be the "Boss" truck motor, and its a work horse, not a performance engine. way to heavy for a car anyway. car and driver is just trying to sell mags...
05-06-2008, 01:39 PM
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 535
RE: 2010 6.2L 400HP
We need more 6.2 400 hp threads! I think I shall make a new one.
05-06-2008, 01:40 PM
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,246
RE: 2010 6.2L 400HP
lol, me too...Stupid Car and Driver!
05-07-2008, 05:57 AM
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 8
RE: 2010 6.2L 400HP
05-07-2008, 02:44 PM
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 686
RE: 2010 6.2L 400HP
a 5.0 is a way better idea.
05-09-2008, 09:48 PM
Join Date: May 2008
Location:
Posts: 35
RE: 2010 6.2L 400HP
yeah I'd have to agree with fordsbestcar. They should bring the 5.0 back into the spotlight or the boss 302 would be just fine.
05-11-2008, 08:57 PM
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 536
RE: 2010 6.2L 400HP
Why would people want the 5.0 over the 6.2L ??? I mean the 6.2 is capable of more power right...?