Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion Did you see that Mustang?! Have you heard Ford's next move? Come inside.

6.L Boss in 2011!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2009, 11:31 AM
  #21  
gburke1
3rd Gear Member
 
gburke1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 536
Default

Originally Posted by socalwrench
6.0L?! No way.

5.0L?! Nope, not in the Mustang.

Blame the government's new MPG requirement- supposedly in effect by 2016. At this time, the Mustang will NOT be getting the new 5.0L. It is currently only slated for the F-150.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30810514/
Actually the 5.0L is official now.

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/18/r...ote-v8-coming/
gburke1 is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 01:45 PM
  #22  
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DTLA, CA
Posts: 4,897
Default

Originally Posted by socalwrench
6.0L?! No way.

5.0L?! Nope, not in the Mustang.

Blame the government's new MPG requirement- supposedly in effect by 2016. At this time, the Mustang will NOT be getting the new 5.0L. It is currently only slated for the F-150.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30810514/
You fail.
83gtragtop is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 03:38 PM
  #23  
maxshuty
4th Gear Member
 
maxshuty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,775
Default

The new 39MPG requirements for 2016 (I dont know if thats even an ACTUAL requirement yet, or if it's still an idea floating around) are for............2016. That means Ford can put a 5.0L, 6.2L engine in any car they want until 2016. That's 7 years away and 7 years from now technology will be a lot more advanced than it is today even. By that time Ford will probably have a big engine that does produce the right emissions and MPG requirements.

I'm almost 100% sure that the "Boss" with that big 'ol engine will be in a Mustang... why wouldn't it be? Ford knows what people want and they know that a Boss would be a big seller amongst enthusiasts.
maxshuty is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 04:06 PM
  #24  
Timspony
SVT Section Moderator
 
Timspony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Burnt Hills, NY
Posts: 15,601
Default

It would be about time if Ford did bring back th Boss!
Timspony is offline  
Old 05-26-2009, 05:06 PM
  #25  
Donnie's GTS
4th Gear Member
 
Donnie's GTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,030
Default

now where in there does it say the 6.2l will be for sure in anything but the raptor.
Donnie's GTS is offline  
Old 05-27-2009, 06:27 PM
  #26  
ThisBlood147
5th Gear Member
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,197
Default

I'll see if I can find it and post the link, but I clearly remember reading an online article about the upcoming Raptor with a Ford engineer saying the 6.2 was not going into the Mustang because it didn't physically fit. So, if there's a shred of truth to this (and I wouldn't be surprised...we're talking about a beefy motor here), the Mustang would have to undergo a redesign in order to accomodate this new "Boss" motor.

Hope this sheds some light on things.
ThisBlood147 is offline  
Old 05-27-2009, 10:42 PM
  #27  
socalwrench
4th Gear Member
 
socalwrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 1,291
Default

Get off your high horse 83ragtop. It's people like you that turn these forums into trash.

Gburke, I don't really trust what a BLOG says. When I left Ford, the 5.0L was ONLY slotted for the F-150. Who the ^&*$ knows- Ford could change their minds... again.

Maxshuty, I did consider this a possibility. Afterall, there was supposed to be a 2009 Mustang BOSS. Ford could use the 5.0L for a few years before Obama and the government tightens their grip with the green cars.
socalwrench is offline  
Old 05-28-2009, 10:45 AM
  #28  
gburke1
3rd Gear Member
 
gburke1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 536
Default

Autoblog really isn't a "blog" at all... it's a full blown automotive news site. It was reported on other sites as well... but it's true that it is all subject to change.
gburke1 is offline  
Old 05-28-2009, 11:35 AM
  #29  
KITT
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
KITT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 136
Default

5.0 is a fact. get over it
KITT is offline  
Old 05-28-2009, 12:17 PM
  #30  
mustangcat
Deputy CatDog - To Purr'tect and Explode
 
mustangcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NM
Posts: 1,900
Default

Originally Posted by maxshuty
The new 39MPG requirements for 2016 (I dont know if thats even an ACTUAL requirement yet, or if it's still an idea floating around) are for............2016. That means Ford can put a 5.0L, 6.2L engine in any car they want until 2016. That's 7 years away and 7 years from now technology will be a lot more advanced than it is today even. By that time Ford will probably have a big engine that does produce the right emissions and MPG requirements.

I'm almost 100% sure that the "Boss" with that big 'ol engine will be in a Mustang... why wouldn't it be? Ford knows what people want and they know that a Boss would be a big seller amongst enthusiasts.
Lesson time kiddos!
The new MPG requirements are NOT per vehicle. They are per fleet. Here's an example:

Ford Mustang GT = 26 mpg
Ford Fusion Hybrid = 50 mpg
= 38 MPG average

And that's all Ford needs 7 years from now. It can still have the Mustang, as long as there's fuel efficient cars to balance the efficiency of their total lineup.
mustangcat is offline  


Quick Reply: 6.L Boss in 2011!!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 AM.