Search



Go Back   MustangForums.com > General Mustang Forums > Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion Did you see that Mustang?! Have you heard Ford's next move? Come inside.
Sponsored by CJ Pony Parts


Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-12-2009, 06:18 AM   #1
inyadreems
2nd Gear Member
 
inyadreems's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Vehicle: 2010 GT500
Location: Stang Island, NY
Posts: 224
Default 2010 Ford Mustang GT vs. 2009 Nissan 370z

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=143666

Two Legends Face Off

By Jason Kavanagh, Engineering Editor Email | Blog
Date posted: 03-10-2009
STORY TOOLS
Digg this storyDigg this!
del.icio.usdel.icio.us

When we last left the 2009 Nissan 370Z, it had just laid a drubbing on BMW's little 135i. We then proclaimed, "The 2009 Nissan 370Z raises the standard for the sport coupe segment to a new level of affordable excellence."

Time to get more serious. It's V8 time. Who's in? Let's see, no Camaro, and a Challenger is not available (don't ask), so that leaves the freshly updated 2010 Ford Mustang GT, a car whose very existence is predicated upon wallet-friendly performance.

Perhaps a reinvigorated veteran can take down the newly crowned king. The particulars might differ — four seats versus two, V8 versus V6 — but the mission is the same. And the 2009 Nissan 370Z and 2010 Ford Mustang GT are priced closer than you might think.

Line 'Em Up
We tested a 2010 Ford Mustang GT Premium Coupe outfitted with the Track Pack, which includes revised dampers, a shorter 3.73:1 axle ratio, a limited-slip differential, better brakes, 19-inch wheels, wider summer performance tires and a few suspension underpinnings pilfered from the Shelby GT500. Add in comfort items and other non-performance options and our tester rings up to $34,775.

As before, our 2009 Nissan 370Z Touring stands in the opposite corner, fresh from our long-term test fleet. It wears the Sport package, which adds bigger brakes, a manual transmission with rev-matching shifting capability, a limited-slip diff, and 19-inch wheels and wider rubber. Our 370Z is also equipped with a $1,850 navigation system that Ford offers but our test car lacks, and its MSRP just crests $40 large at $40,320.

Bottom line, we've essentially gathered the most expensive versions of both cars. Not by choice, it just worked out that way. But they can both be bought for less, much less, and with all their good go-fast parts. In other words, there are cheaper versions of these cars that will perform the same as these loaded examples, only without a few comfort extras. The base price on a Mustang GT Premium is $30,995, while a 370Z starts at $29,930. Add the Track Package to the Mustang and your MSRP is $32,494. Add the Sport Package to the Z and you're looking at $33,625.

But is the new 370Z really worth more than the new Mustang in an economy as brutal as this one? We aimed to find out.

The Light Goes Green
Go ahead; pick a car, any car. Both of them will reach 60 mph in 5.2 seconds (4.9 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip). Similarly, the Z runs the quarter in 13.5 seconds at 103.7 mph and the Mustang a nearly identical 13.5 at 102.9 mph. If their straight-line performance was any closer we'd have to start splitting atoms to measure the difference. And before you ask, we filled the Mustang with premium (91 octane) fuel, which Ford says fattens up the torque curve without affecting the peak.

The difference between the two lies in the power delivery. With better gearing and less weight, the 3,374-pound 370Z's speed sneaks up on you. The 7,500-rpm reach of its 3.7-liter V6 is far around the tachometer dial, and there are no flat spots in the power delivery all the way up to the 332-horsepower peak at 7,000 rpm.

However, the coarse sounds and vibration of this V6 mean you have to grit your teeth and force yourself to keep the throttle floored past 6,000 rpm. Like other Nissans equipped with this powertrain, the din is accompanied by a gearlever that sizzles frantically with high-frequency vibration. We're fans of earlier iterations of Nissan's VQ-Series V6, but the 370Z's VQ37HR could use some finishing school.

If you're cynical, the 2010 Ford Mustang's three-valve 4.6-liter V8 can be thought of as a weaponized version of an engine that dates back nearly a decade and a half (though not that much further than the VQ-Series V6, really). Yet this mill doesn't betray its age willingly. The benefits of continuous improvement are evident in its tractability and willingness to run happily on regular-grade 87 octane fuel.

The 315-hp Mustang's V8 doesn't two-by-four you in the chest when you mat the throttle off idle and then fall on its face, wheezing like some pony car of old. Instead, the torque is soft down low, stacking up progressively as the revs pile on. It needs to be above 3,000 rpm before the V8 starts cashing the checks written by its intake note.

And it is some intake note — Ford has done a stupendous job of replicating the gloriously guttural bark of 1960s-era Mustangs, and it renders the Z's grating high-rpm warble that much more intolerable. The urge to scale and descend the Mustang's rev range just to savor it is irresistible.

A Bend in the Road
Despite the Track Pack's shorter 3.73:1 rear end, the 3,572-pound Mustang is still geared too tall. This dulls the V8's snappiness, an impression exacerbated by the Mustang's overly soft engine mounts. As a result, driveline lash is a companion at low speeds. Pay close attention and you can also feel the powertrain lurching about during quick transient handling maneuvers, such as rapid lane changes.

With that said, the Mustang's initial turn into a corner is immediate, almost disconcertingly so since the steering is lifeless and doesn't build effort commensurate with the movements of the chassis. The new car is an improvement over previous Mustangs, but it doesn't hold a candle to the way the 2009 Nissan 370Z responds to steering inputs.

No review involving the 2010 Ford Mustang would be complete without addressing the live axle. It has its benefits for launching and on billiard-table-smooth road-racing tracks, yet makes its compromises known to you in the real world far too often. Years of development still haven't reversed physics, and you're reminded of this every time the Mustang's rear end encounters a bump and pitches you vertically like a toddler on a parent's knee.

Find a blemish-free stretch of tarmac and the Mustang is an engaging companion, though we expected the Track Pack to be a bit sharper in controlling roll and pitch. The balance is there, though, as long as you let the chassis take a set. Then you can easily transition between steady-state understeer and easily controllable throttle steer. It's fun in the hooligan way that Mustangs have always been, just with a bit more control than before.

Hard braking with the Mustang results in a lot of nose dive and some seriously rapid deceleration — it comes to a halt from 60 mph in just 107 feet, which betters the performance turned in by the Z by just a foot. It's the Z's binders we lust after, though — unlike the Mustang, the 370's pedal feel is consistently solid whether you're strafing the canyons or crawling in gridlock.

Stretching the Gap
If the 2010 Mustang proves a surprisingly capable handler, then the Z is nevertheless in another galaxy. You can see this in the way the 370Z grips harder on the skid pad at 0.94g to the Mustang's 0.91g, but the differences in capability are more prominently evidenced in the slalom. Here, the Z changes direction with more immediacy, returning a 72-mph slalom speed to the Mustang's 68.4 mph.

Putting aside the numbers, you get the first clue of the Z's sporting intent before you're even moving. The steering wheel's sculpted grips hint at what's to come when you bend the car through a chicane. The 370Z's helm is a revelation, quicker and far more precise than the Mustang, with a sporting heft and a chatty nature. Cornering loads build in direct proportion to the steering wheel input angle in a way that's intuitive and confidence-inspiring. You'd be hard-pressed to find better steering anywhere. Jump into the 370Z after wheeling the Mustang and you'll wonder why the Mustang is so sloppy.

The Z's responses are devoid of slack, yet this focus doesn't have the usual tradeoff of a jolting ride. This is a chassis that never needs to take a set — the Z is always poised.

Then there's SynchroRev Match, a feature that every automaker ought to be scrambling to try to replicate. Not only does it let you focus on your braking points when you're driving with full commitment, it also aids in providing engine braking in the crush of traffic. Simply put, it's the most brilliant enhancement to doing it manually since the blow-up doll.

That's not to say that the 370Z's transmission does everything perfectly. Upshifts suffer from a slightly sticky gearchange and the clutch takeup could be more progressive. These aren't showstoppers, but nailing details like these would propel the Z to the sports car elite.

Living in Style
Noticeable improvements in materials quality and NVH were part of the 2010 Ford Mustang's design brief, and you can see it in the soft-touch dashboard materials and hear it in the lack of road and wind noise.

Yet certain aspects of the Mustang's cabin frustrate us — its retro-style gauges belong back in the 1960s, as they're not only illegible but also are prone to being obscured by stray reflections. The cruise control interface was crummy a decade ago. Plus, the steering wheel is too large and its clunky spokes discourage optimum nine-and-three hand placement. But, hey, you can choose from hundreds of different interior lighting color schemes. Really, when it comes to design nuances in a performance car, this isn't what we had in mind.

On the plus side, there's a sense of spaciousness in the Mustang that the Z-car can't match, and the Ford's seats are more comfortable than the Z's, if not quite as supportive. And practicality is a no-brainer — the Mustang has rear seats, and small as they are, this fact alone goes a long way toward daily-driver viability.

If you shied away from the plasticky 350Z, fear not the 370Z. The 2009 Nissan 370Z's cabin is finished to a much higher standard, with synthetic suede and high-quality trimmings. There are lots of gauges and they're all legible, the centerpiece being a huge tachometer that dominates the instrument cluster like the eye of Cyclops.

At the same time, the Z-car is a much more intimate place than the Mustang's cabin, so make sure you shower before picking up your date (don't ask how we know this). You'll also want to be careful when backing out of your beau's driveway, too — that monolithic C-pillar could blot out a Brinks truck.

Wrap Up
Large, gregarious and sporting a fan base of Americans millions strong despite its flaws, the 2010 Ford Mustang is the Rush Limbaugh of cars. It might be outclassed by the 2009 Nissan 370Z, but for many the charms of the Mustang cannot be replaced. At $35 grand, though, the Mustang GT is a tough sell. If you're willing to forgo some amenities, you could have a Mustang GT that performs similarly to our tester for a bit less money. That's the Mustang we'd prefer.

When it comes to delivering the best things about performance cars, the Z-car is a decathlete that leaps higher, throws farther and swims harder than the rest. If you can make the financial stretch for it, the 2009 Nissan 370Z will provide all the stimulus you need.

The manufacturers provided Edmunds these vehicles for the purposes of evaluation.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
inyadreems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 10:52 AM   #2
steele901
4th Gear Member
 
steele901's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Vehicle: Beater
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,246
Default

I wouldn't exactly call the "Z" a legend... but a nice 2 seater sports car non the less.

Z vs mustang reviews have always bothered me. they're really 2 totally different types of cars.

If mags and putting the mustang up against the Z, why not the corvette or the s2000. that makes sense right?.....
__________________
'95 GT 5-Speed - 276rwhp & 321rwtq(Gone but not forgotten)
steele901 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 03:58 PM   #3
redass02gt
EXTREME Moderation
 
redass02gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Vehicle: 92 Geo Metro
Location: BLAM-O
Posts: 7,646
Default

$35k for a mustang seems pretty ridiculous.

hell, $35k for any ford sounds ridiculous.
__________________

GO BEERS!
Quote:
Originally Posted by drhoward View Post
Or anus
redass02gt is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 04:14 PM   #4
ThisBlood147
5th Gear Member

 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 05 Mustang GT
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,197
Send a message via Yahoo to ThisBlood147
Default

That 35K pricetag was a pretty loaded specimen. The author of that article was trying to slant the facts to make the Mustang seem overpriced.......nevermind that an equally optioned Z was over 40K. He also mistated that the GT started at 30k base......when it actually starts off at 27.9K for an unoptioned model....cheaper than the Z's 29K starting base.

I say, if you're gonna compare two cars pricewise....ESPECIALLY if they aren't even in the same class.......you compare them by their base price and their fully optioned price (if you're so inclined to bring options into the mix). Truly though, the whole GT vs 370Z is already getting old and every mag and their mama just jumped onto that bandwagon not long ago. Why not bring in the G8 GT or Charger RT into the equation? Because they have 4 doors? Well the Z only has 2 seats (as in.....sportscar) while the Mustang seats 4 and a practical trunk. Hell, they could have drug in the STI, Evo, or G37 while they were at it. Erg.....I dunno, just dumb if you ask me. Why has no one done a Challenger R/T vs Mustang GT comparo yet? Both are available........AND in the same class.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielleAnne
So technically the power to money ratio is still much better with the Camaro...
I don't think they correct times at the 1320 for that......
ThisBlood147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 04:19 PM   #5
Joolander
Lord High Protector

 
Joolander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: 2007 Mustang GT/CS
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,740
Joolander
Default

because

Quote:
Originally Posted by inyadreems View Post
Time to get more serious. It's V8 time. Who's in? Let's see, no Camaro, and a Challenger is not available (don't ask), so that leaves the freshly updated 2010 Ford Mustang GT, a car whose very existence is predicated upon wallet-friendly performance.



also, they have pages to fill
__________________

Joolander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 05:10 PM   #6
2011Black5.0
4th Gear Member
 
2011Black5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Vehicle: 2011 5.0
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,685
Default

Lol just read this article. I sent an email to edmunds saying that in this economy the only way things will get better for us Americans is for them to stop talking crap about American car companies and stop trying to make American cars look bad in their bad comparisons. maybe then Americans will give American car companies a chance
__________________
2011 Silver 5.0 Manual, Brembo Package, 3.73s, and spoiler delete

Mods: Vortech black kit, Axis Reverbs 18x9.5, Magnaflow competition cat-backs, Trufiber SH-GT hood, hood pins, Street Scenes ducktail spoiler, Eibach Pro-kit, Hurst shifter. Many more to come.

Past cars:
2005 Mustang V6
2005 Mustang GT Edmunds Insideline http://www.insideline.com/ford/shelb...00-part-2.html
2007 Roush Nitemare #58
2011Black5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 07:49 PM   #7
mustangcat
Deputy CatDog - To Purr'tect and Explode
 
mustangcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: Ford F150
Location: NM
Posts: 1,900
Default

You really have to take everything Edmunds says with a grain of salt.
I do love how they claim the new GT with 15 more horsepower, 3.73 gears, and wider tires pulls the exact same 1/4 mile time and trap of a stock S197 GT. Not odd at all.
__________________
mustangcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 08:09 PM   #8
2011Black5.0
4th Gear Member
 
2011Black5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Vehicle: 2011 5.0
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,685
Default

lol ya seriously i think nissan just said edmunds can be the first to write a 370Z unveiling article and unveil it with them but they have to be one sided and make it look better than all its competition in exchange
__________________
2011 Silver 5.0 Manual, Brembo Package, 3.73s, and spoiler delete

Mods: Vortech black kit, Axis Reverbs 18x9.5, Magnaflow competition cat-backs, Trufiber SH-GT hood, hood pins, Street Scenes ducktail spoiler, Eibach Pro-kit, Hurst shifter. Many more to come.

Past cars:
2005 Mustang V6
2005 Mustang GT Edmunds Insideline http://www.insideline.com/ford/shelb...00-part-2.html
2007 Roush Nitemare #58
2011Black5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 01:29 AM   #9
_Slowbra_
2nd Gear Member

 
_Slowbra_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Vehicle: 2003 Mach 1
Location: Florida
Posts: 240
Default

stupid comparo like everyone else said. the Z is a nice car, but the interior is cramped (not so much "intimate")...its all about adjectives and thats what pisses me off.

the mustang was just as fast, had a better overall interior (just not the gauges), was less expensive, and has the more "refined" engine.

the Z handled better.

its been the same for as long as i can remember.
_Slowbra_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 02:59 AM   #10
GTRACER88
5th Gear Member
 
GTRACER88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Vehicle: 2012 Mustang 5.0L
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
Default

Nobody else noticed the LOW MPH trap on the mustang? Seems quite odd.
__________________
2011 Grabber Blue V6 -- SuperSlow...
GTRACER88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 02:59 AM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
2005, 2009, 2010, 370z, changing, cluster, color, dash, gt, instrument, kit, mustang, mustangz, nissan, power, sti, vq37hr

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mustang GT vs Nissan 370z Bill101 2005 - 2014 Mustangs 16 03-15-2009 01:43 PM

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.

ฉ Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Fordฎ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup