The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > General Mustang Forums > Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2009, 10:30 AM   #21
TorchRed '03
1st Gear Member
2003 Ford Mustang
 
TorchRed '03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Vehicle: 2003 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Missouri
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ke^in View Post
Well I am not the original owner. He bought it new in 2002. From 2002 to 2009 he put 8,997 miles on it. It was mostly in the garage with a cover over it most of her life. Since I've gotten it, I almost have 10k on it now. Been about a month. It was like buying an almost brand new NewEdge in 2009.
Sounds like a great deal. I got a good deal on mine, but it was super high mileage. Still runs like a champ though.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________


'03 GT
Strut Tower Brace
K&N drop-in
tint
shorty antenna

more to follow....
TorchRed '03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 11:51 PM   #22
Ronny2010GT
1st Gear Member
2010 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Vehicle: 2010 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Georgia
Posts: 55
Send a message via AIM to Ronny2010GT Send a message via MSN to Ronny2010GT
Default

Like I said in another thread, I will bet my month's pay that the 5.0 Mustang will not be a GT. It's going to be a special model like maybe (hopefully) the return of the Mach 1. If Ford does this, they will have to bump the price of the GT. That won't go well with the consumer.
Ronny2010GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 02:14 AM   #23
darwin06
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Vehicle: 06 ford mustang
Location: NY
Posts: 28
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronny2010GT View Post
Like I said in another thread, I will bet my month's pay that the 5.0 Mustang will not be a GT. It's going to be a special model like maybe (hopefully) the return of the Mach 1. If Ford does this, they will have to bump the price of the GT. That won't go well with the consumer.
If it does go to a Mach 1 I might be in the market for one. I doubt you will see 400 hp stock, They are not in to win the race, they are in to sell the cars and make a profit. Special models are a small portion of the Market. The v6 and GT need to be cheap and simple. I still love this aftermarket for the mustang, going strong.

Hell, I might want an engine swap for the fun of it.
__________________
Racing done, no more fun.
darwin06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 10:37 AM   #24
sponkey21
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Vehicle: 1988 Toyota Corolla
Location: California
Posts: 65
Default

There have been multiple posts, and even a full thread on how the 4.6 will be cease production, and, therefore, the 4.6 will not exist in 2011. he also reported that the 5.4 would cease to exist, but we see now that it is just the iron block 5.4, the aluminum 5.4 that the Ford GT used will be the engine in the 2011 GT500. Oh, and there will be 6 speed transmissions all around. 5.0 is the new GT motor. Period. 400 horses, 5.0, 6 speeds. A Ford parts guy found the new engine and 5.0 badges in the 2011 mustang parts catalog, and there was no 4.6 anymore, I believe.

Besides, it would cost a lot more to have production lines for 2 completely different engines. This way they just have to pay for one production line. It is more cost efficient, and what the people want. Win win and a no brainer.
sponkey21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 10:57 PM   #25
Ronny2010GT
1st Gear Member
2010 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Vehicle: 2010 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Georgia
Posts: 55
Send a message via AIM to Ronny2010GT Send a message via MSN to Ronny2010GT
Default

Multiple posts and a full thread don't prove a thing. Everything is just speculation. For all we know your source is full of it. Taking the 4.6 away will be a stupid move on Ford's part. They can kiss their GT sales goodbye when people see the price go up and the gas mileage drop. Don't get me wrong, a 5.0 400 HP GT would be amazing. However, darwin06 brings a valid point. Ford doesn't build their models to win races, they build them to sell cars. When they do want to build a car to win the race that is when you see your Terminators or Cobra R's or GT500's. Pretty much the entire history of the Mustang has been a base model, GT model, and a performance model for the horsepower junkies. Affordable muscle, that's what Ford is all about.
Ronny2010GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 02:21 AM   #26
Gene K
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Decatur AL USA
Posts: 1,583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronny2010GT View Post
Multiple posts and a full thread don't prove a thing. Everything is just speculation. For all we know your source is full of it. Taking the 4.6 away will be a stupid move on Ford's part. They can kiss their GT sales goodbye when people see the price go up and the gas mileage drop. Don't get me wrong, a 5.0 400 HP GT would be amazing. However, darwin06 brings a valid point. Ford doesn't build their models to win races, they build them to sell cars. When they do want to build a car to win the race that is when you see your Terminators or Cobra R's or GT500's. Pretty much the entire history of the Mustang has been a base model, GT model, and a performance model for the horsepower junkies. Affordable muscle, that's what Ford is all about.
While Ford has not announced the Coyote officially (discounting the admisson by Ford of Australia Executive that Ford USA would supply it for the next generation Falcon) they have anounced they will discontinue manufacture of the 4.6L at Romeo so exactly where are you planning to get the 4.6L?

The 5.0L Coyote will not be that expensive because it will be the primary V-8 in the F150, SUV's, the next generation Panther (CV, GM, TC) and Falcon (Australia). It will also get better MPG than the current 4.6L and 5.4L engines.
__________________
Gene
2007 GT-D M5 3.55 3700 lb (280 lb Driver)
CAI/Tune and Stock Pirellis
1.909 8.345@84.83 12.957@106.62
http://i253.photobucket.com/albums/h...nePirellis.jpg

Last edited by Gene K; 06-29-2009 at 02:26 AM.
Gene K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 02:52 AM   #27
ThisBlood147
5th Gear Member
2005 Ford Mustang
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 05 Mustang GT
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,067
Send a message via Yahoo to ThisBlood147
Default

Agreed. I think one thing ppl keep forgetting is that the 5.0 is slated (according to latest "rumor") to replace all 4.6 duties within Ford's lineup. Becoming a mainstream, multi-platform motor means the costs will be much lower than if it were a specialty performance-only motor produced in limited quantities. Ford is in no shape to produce two V8's to occupy the same segment duties. The 5.0 will replace the 4.6 and some of the 5.4 applications, and the new 6.2 will replace the remainder of the 5.4 duties.

If the Coyote doesn't end up costing significantly more to produce (which it shouldn't) and turns out to be as capable as we've been hearing.....it WILL be the smartest move Ford has made since they dropped the old 5.0 back in 96.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielleAnne
So technically the power to money ratio is still much better with the Camaro...
I don't think they correct times at the 1320 for that......
ThisBlood147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 09:37 AM   #28
bpark8824
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Vehicle: 1994 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronny2010GT View Post
Multiple posts and a full thread don't prove a thing. Everything is just speculation. For all we know your source is full of it. Taking the 4.6 away will be a stupid move on Ford's part. They can kiss their GT sales goodbye when people see the price go up and the gas mileage drop. Don't get me wrong, a 5.0 400 HP GT would be amazing. However, darwin06 brings a valid point. Ford doesn't build their models to win races, they build them to sell cars. When they do want to build a car to win the race that is when you see your Terminators or Cobra R's or GT500's. Pretty much the entire history of the Mustang has been a base model, GT model, and a performance model for the horsepower junkies. Affordable muscle, that's what Ford is all about.
Like others said, the 4.6 will no longer be produced, so unless Ford has 100k sitting on the shelf to keep putting in the gt, it will no longer be in the gt. The 5.0 will and trust me, I bet you anything it will get better mpg than the 4.6. It would only make sense with the technology and fact that our retard Pres. thinks everything should get 50 mpg by next year.
__________________
1994 5.0L 302ci
bpark8824 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 10:27 AM   #29
Ronny2010GT
1st Gear Member
2010 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Vehicle: 2010 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Georgia
Posts: 55
Send a message via AIM to Ronny2010GT Send a message via MSN to Ronny2010GT
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gene K View Post
While Ford has not announced the Coyote officially (discounting the admisson by Ford of Australia Executive that Ford USA would supply it for the next generation Falcon) they have anounced they will discontinue manufacture of the 4.6L at Romeo so exactly where are you planning to get the 4.6L?
I'd like to see the press release where Ford announces this.
Ronny2010GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 01:02 PM   #30
gburke1
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronny2010GT View Post
I'd like to see the press release where Ford announces this.
Someone's mad they bought a 2010 :P
__________________

13.082 @ 105.05 MPH w/ 1.969 60' on Stock P-Zero 17s

'06 Performance White Auto GT, Kooks LT Headers, Kooks Catted X-Pipe, Pypes Mid Muffler System, C&L Racer CAI, Supertune Performance Dyno Tune, Stock P-Zero 17" Tires
gburke1 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
2011, 50, 6speed, automatic, coyote, discussion, gt, gt500, mustang, powertrain, price, rumours, speed, transmission, v8

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company