Z16

As a GM person that this is about right on for the most part. Just think we have pony cars from both manufactures that are over 400 hp and tq and 6 speed trans....how cool is that. The weight for the Mustang does give it an advantage but those 20" wheels are heavy and will screw up handling, I would stick with the 18's and wish that GM had done that with the Camaro. Mustang doesn't have the handling advantage that C&D gave it in that issue months ago, check out the numbers that the GT, GT500, and the Camaro SS laid down in the lastest article of C&D all the cars at the track (can't remember the track), the Camaro put the hurt to the Mustang GT and was really close to the GT500. Is the S197 chassis a great car, hell yes and I would give the Mustang alot of consideration when in the market for the 2011 model, but the new body in the rear is ugly (IMO no offense), if it was the old car then I would be right there.

Yes the Camaro is hard to see out compared to the Mustang. The 20" wheels, leave them off both cars......too damn heavy. I do disagree about the parking of the Camaro, I have driven a few and it is no harder to park or drive than anything else I have driven.

S281 E

You will notice most of the people on this forum dislike the rear of the 2010+ model. BUT being its a mustang you know there will be an after market rear end that you would like very soon.

Daniel60

thanks for the kind words Z16 and how about this rear end.

72MachOne99GT

if they could develop more of an actual defined rear bumper on that shelby, get rid of the center exhaust they'd be golden

*by making a more defined bumper I also hope to shave off the round things, which I assume are reverse lights*

2K7SilverStang

30-mpg is for the v6, its closer to 28 is what ford is claiming now for the GT... which is still amazing but i cant wrap my head around it.. so much power AND fuel eco??? is there any competition left?