Is Independent Rear Suspension Good for Next Generation Ford Mustang?
#11
Overall, I think IRS is a good move. Especially for daily driving. Sure there are a lot of people drag racing but if you compare that to the number of daily driven Mustangs and nothing else its small. Plus I'm sure those true drag racing guys will be able to do a swap to the live axle.
#12
I'm with the "more options" crowd. IRS or solid, no matter, just give us the options.
There are a ton of 6 cylinder Mustangs on the road, and the overwhelming majority of those are not taken to your local drag strip. In terms of real world figures, Ford is selling a car to "average" folks who don't do foolish things with their cars. Those of us who really do push our cars (be it at the strip or road course) are the minority. That's why you're seeing more luxury appointments in the car. Ford needs to do whatever it can to sell the car at a profit. So if an IRS will attract more "average" drivers, it'll get one.
Of course, it's not like Ford doesn't care about the real enthusiast crowd (those I referred to as doing foolish things =)...). After all, our interests and our activities help establish an image for the Mustang. And the "normal" driver is a consumer who often buys based on image. So my sense is that Ford will have to juggle two marketing ploys: BOTH aimed at the "average" driver. There's a real-world comfort advantage in the IRS on one hand, and a marketing ploy that makes one feel like they're driving "American muscle" even though they're driving it like Mrs. Daisy on the other.
Personally, power figures and body styling get the "American muscle" thing done (and done well), so I'm guessing they'll up the ante of the car with an IRS to give it greater comfort on the road. I'm a road-racer enthusiast, so this could be wishful thinking. But even so, I'd be really excited to see a solid-axle option for those true enthusiasts who are definitely intent on taking their cars to the strip. I just don't see why that would be so hard to swing...
Ford needs to rethink the bundles in their option-packaging. I can see how they may have some packaging motivation, but they can bundle things together after a more thoughtful review of consumer camps.
Best,
-j
There are a ton of 6 cylinder Mustangs on the road, and the overwhelming majority of those are not taken to your local drag strip. In terms of real world figures, Ford is selling a car to "average" folks who don't do foolish things with their cars. Those of us who really do push our cars (be it at the strip or road course) are the minority. That's why you're seeing more luxury appointments in the car. Ford needs to do whatever it can to sell the car at a profit. So if an IRS will attract more "average" drivers, it'll get one.
Of course, it's not like Ford doesn't care about the real enthusiast crowd (those I referred to as doing foolish things =)...). After all, our interests and our activities help establish an image for the Mustang. And the "normal" driver is a consumer who often buys based on image. So my sense is that Ford will have to juggle two marketing ploys: BOTH aimed at the "average" driver. There's a real-world comfort advantage in the IRS on one hand, and a marketing ploy that makes one feel like they're driving "American muscle" even though they're driving it like Mrs. Daisy on the other.
Personally, power figures and body styling get the "American muscle" thing done (and done well), so I'm guessing they'll up the ante of the car with an IRS to give it greater comfort on the road. I'm a road-racer enthusiast, so this could be wishful thinking. But even so, I'd be really excited to see a solid-axle option for those true enthusiasts who are definitely intent on taking their cars to the strip. I just don't see why that would be so hard to swing...
Ford needs to rethink the bundles in their option-packaging. I can see how they may have some packaging motivation, but they can bundle things together after a more thoughtful review of consumer camps.
Best,
-j
#15
I learned performance driving in a 911 Porsche. To a certain extent the old mantra I learned about "don't lift" in a corner probably helps me keep the rear axle planted in the Stang. I any event I find there needs to be a really bad bump to upset the rear axle.
I wouldn't mind seeing IRS as an option. However, IRS could be a step backward if it is not as well sorted as the current solid axle.
#17
#18
I'm sure the Ford engineers could built a great if not world class IRS for the Mustang. The question is whether the bean counters in accounting will give them the budget. I'm concerned that the orders will be to put in an inferior IRS simply so Ford can state that the Mustang now has IRS.
#19
I'm cool with an IRS as long as the price doesn't skyrocket again. The price of a Mustang from only 5 years ago has already gone up quite a bit and if the price keeps going up....who's going to be able to afford a new Mustang anymore? Certainly no one on a "secretary's" wage.